 |
07-07-2008, 01:43 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
left this forum longback
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
|
What happens after TV's mainframe era ends next February?
Quote:
Remember television? For most of its history, TV wasn't cable, satellite or YouTube. It was radio with low-res moving pictures. On the transmitting side it was an extension of radio, with transmitters on towers, mountains and high buildings, serving viewers with signals within a range limited by frequency and terrain. Like FM radio, TV was on VHF bands. In the U.S., channels 2-6 were spread from 54 to 88MHz (ending just below the FM band) and channels 7-13 ran from 174-216Mhz.
Not all TV signals are the same. For a signal with a given power and antenna height, range varies with frequency. Higher frequencies have less bending properties than lower ones. Energy is also more quickly absorbed by atmosphere and reduced or halted by buildings and terrain. This is why (again in the U.S.) visual signals for channels 2-6 had maximum powers of 100,000 watts, while those from 7-13 had "equivalent" maximum powers of 316,000 watts.
Range for a given power became more critical when TV expanded to the UHF band in the 1950s. UHF was problematic from the beginning. Receiving it required a new or expanded tuner, plus a new kind of antenna specially designed for the very short UHF waves. This is why TVs from the 50s to the 90s came with little "loop" or "bowtie" antennas, in addition to rabbit ears. The latter were for UHF while the former were for VHF.
For TV stations and networks, VHF channels were much more desirable than UHF ones — not just because VHF channel numbers were lower and more easily remembered, but because UHF signals had much less range than VHF ones. To compete with VHF signals, UHF stations could operate with a maximum power of 5,000,000 watts. And even those signals were never equivalent. If you're looking to push signals out past the horizon, VHF is much better than UHF.
In recent years the UHF band has also become more cramped. UHF TV originally ran from channels 14-80 (470-894Mhz). Since then everything upwards of channel 51 (698-869MHz) has been lopped off for a variety of other uses. Pagers use the 806-824MHz band (formerly TV channels 70-72). Analog mobile phones got 824–849 MHz (formerly TV channels 73-77). Public safety got the 849-869MHz band (formerly TV channels 77-80). And the "700MHz" band (formerly TV channels 52-69) was auctioned off in March of this year.
Yet UHF is winning, by federal mandate. On February 17, 2009, all U.S. television stations will be required to switch off their analog transmitters and use digital transmission exclusively. Nearly all of that will happen on what's left of the UHF band. Most stations will maintain their old channel branding, and still be known as "Channel 2" or "Channel 12", but their signals will in nearly all cases be coming in on a new UHF channel. For example, WNBC-TV in New York will move from Channel 4 to Channel 28. WABC-TV will move from Channel 7 to Channel 45. Both are already broadcasting on those channels in digital form. Come next February, all of them will, even if all they're doing is putting out low-def pictures over a high-def signal. In the Boston area, where I live most of the year, only one of the four major commercial networks broadcast their evening news in HD. The rest put SD (standard def) pictures on an HD signal.
|
Read Complete article here:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/...-next-february
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
07-07-2008, 11:33 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Manchester United
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Kolkata, India
Posts: 1,380
|
Re: What happens after TV's mainframe era ends next February?
Indians are not concerned for this.  Most of us are satisfied with the analog signals of cable. US channels will be digitized in Feb 2009. Our channels will be digitized in 2020.  . First we should switch to HD and then think about all this. My LG 32" LCD (32LC7R) is not using it's full potential.
__________________
PS3-Ipod Touch 4G-Samsung Galaxy Ace-Sapphire HD 6870 Twin Frozer-Creative Zen:cloud9:
|
|
|
07-07-2008, 12:34 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Cool as a CUCUMBAR ! ! !
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,052
|
Re: What happens after TV's mainframe era ends next February?
it wont bother me much ..... coz 2 many reality shows have brought down my TV viewing ......
__________________
... W H O T ...
|
|
|
07-07-2008, 02:20 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 441
|
Re: What happens after TV's mainframe era ends next February?
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitized
US channels will be digitized in Feb 2009. Our channels will be digitized in 2020.(
|
well said mate...agree with you
|
|
|
07-07-2008, 04:11 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
IronMan; Ready to Roll...
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Metal City
Posts: 1,273
|
Re: What happens after TV's mainframe era ends next February?
Yeah, Indian TV shows are getting crmped up with Reality shows.. Too many of them and that has brought down the curiousity and the discovery element one would have had 2-3 years ago.
__________________
Aluminum MacBook 2.0GHz Collector's Edition
Windows Box: 2.26G P4, 1GiB RAM, 320GB SATA + 80GB PATA HDD, Nvidia FX5200
AOC Fovi F22
iPod Touch 16GiB, HTC Gene, Moto W230, Sansa Express
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|