Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > News > Technology News
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Technology News News from the world of technology that our members stumble across. NOTE: Sources to be mentioned at the beginning of each post.


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2008, 03:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
Bond, Desi Bond!
 
desiibond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 10,035
Default Apple may soon be free from AT&T


Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-99...?tag=cnetfd.mt

While everyone else was calling the iPhone the greatest device of all time and putting Steve Jobs on that pedestal he enjoys so much yesterday, AT&T quietly told its investors that the revenue sharing deal it had with Apple for the past year has ended.
At first glance, that development may not matter to most. After all, that agreement really only affected Apple and AT&T and consumers were still forced to pay the same price regardless of the revenue sharing.
But if you take another look, you might find that there may be more to this story than meets the eye.
Now that Apple and AT&T have squeaked out of the deal, what's holding the two companies together? Certainly some would say that it's that oft-mentioned exclusivity agreement the companies signed, but I don't know of one person who actually read the thing and no one really knows if Apple can get out or not.
But if I had to take a guess, step one in getting out of its contract with AT&T revolved around the revenue sharing deal. And before you know it, Steve Jobs' latest blockbuster may be on other carriers.
It may be hard to believe right now, but rest assured that the chances of AT&T and Apple no longer working with each other are greater than you might think.
Now that AT&T isn't sharing revenue with Apple, the agreement between the companies is all too similar to that between any other device manufacturer and a carrier. In essence, the carrier subsidizes the price of the phone and the device manufacturer offers the phone to the carrier. Nothing more, nothing less.
But in that same agreement, most of those device manufacturers sell the phones to other carriers too. And why not? In a market where competition is everywhere and the chances of rising to the top are so low, why wouldn't the manufacturer sell the phone to as many carriers as possible to (hopefully) profit off their investment?
Of course, Apple won't have too much trouble profiting off its investment, but why wouldn't the company explore other opportunities and try to offer the iPhone to as many customers as possible?
Last year, Apple's deal with AT&T made some sense after we heard about the revenue sharing deal. But now, I just don't see why the company would even consider maintaining its exclusivity deal.
When the revenue sharing was in place, Apple stood to make much more on an iPhone that was on AT&T's service than an unlocked device. But now, the tables have turned. Instead of caring which carrier the iPhone is on, Apple couldn't care less. As far as Steve Jobs is concerned, an iPhone sale means a one-time profit regardless of the service its connected to.
Hard as I might try, I just can't see why AT&T would want out of the revenue sharing deal unless it has some sort of bricking plan up its sleeve. Think about it: the company has said that it will subsidize the cost of the 3G iPhone to encourage more customers to its side, but what if that customer buys the iPhone, unlocks it and puts it on T-Mobile's service? AT&T not only loses the monthly revenue, but its subsidy, as well. All the while, Apple walks away with a solid profit and a smile.
So if AT&T really didn't want out of the revenue sharing deal (and the more I consider it, the more I don't think it did), but it happened anyway, what does that say about Apple? Doesn't it hint that the revenue sharing deal was the only thing holding the company back from going to other carriers? Doesn't it tell us that its plan is not to be in bed with one company, but to offer its device to any and all customers? Doesn't it tell us that it's sick and tired of a limited customer base?
AT&T is trying to put its own spin on the demise of the revenue sharing deal, but it knows all too well that it was the only thing keeping Apple on its side. Now that it's gone and Apple will enjoy the same benefit from selling the iPhone regardless of the service its connected to, the companies' tie is as flimsy as it has ever been.
And it's for that reason that Apple, smelling greener pastures and more customers, will find a way to sneak its way out of the exclusivity agreement and bring the iPhone to every major US carrier.
When? I don't know. But rest assured that it could happen sooner than you think.

After one or two months, we might well see the unlocked iphone shipped worldwide by Apple.
__________________
My first blogspace: http://desiibond.blogspot.com
desiibond is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 12-06-2008, 01:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
aryayush's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Noida
Posts: 5,601
Default Re: Apple may soon be free from AT&T

Quote:
Originally Posted by desiibond View Post
Hard as I might try, I just can't see why AT&T would want out of the revenue sharing deal unless it has some sort of bricking plan up its sleeve. Think about it: the company has said that it will subsidize the cost of the 3G iPhone to encourage more customers to its side, but what if that customer buys the iPhone, unlocks it and puts it on T-Mobile's service? AT&T not only loses the monthly revenue, but its subsidy, as well.
LOL! No, they don’t. AT&T isn’t as stupid as this writer seems to think they are. You have to activate iPhones in the store itself and signup for a two-year contract before you can use the device. AT&T is probably going to enforce an Early Termination Fee that will cover the cost of subsidy and then some. Unlocking was detrimental to AT&T’s bottom-line when customers could purchase the phone and take it home without having to activate it. That’s not the case now.

Once that point is out of the way, it’s easy to see how the rest of the article falls apart.
__________________
Miss me already? See you on Penned Thoughts [http://aayush.me] then. Adios! :)
aryayush is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Releases iTunes 7.2, Launches iTunes Plus (DRM Free) aryayush Technology News 2 08-01-2009 03:49 PM
Apple May Offer Free Music Access ThinkFree Technology News 7 21-03-2008 08:45 AM
Apple MWSF 2008 - MacBook Air, iPod touch, iPhone, Apple TV & iTunes Store updates... aryayush Technology News 99 21-01-2008 06:32 PM
Like Amazon's DRM-Free Music Downloads? Thank Apple aryayush Technology News 2 26-09-2007 10:10 PM

 
Latest Threads
- by abhidev
- by chris
- by clmlbx

Advertisement




All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2