| Forum |
|
|||||||
| Technology News News from the world of technology that our members stumble across. NOTE: Sources to be mentioned at the beginning of each post. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Microsoft MVP
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: AskVG.com
Posts: 5,173
|
Firefox 3 should contain so many changes that it wont be able to run on Windows 95,98,NT 4, 2000 or ME. There is also a build called Minefield it has the same build number, but an other name. Download FireFox3 Alpha (Gran Paradiso) Download FireFox3 Alpha (Minefield) Source |
|
|
| Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them. | |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pune
Posts: 1,344
|
So many betas and alpas I now hate these
__________________
AMD Athlon64 2800+|ASUS K8N-VM|2GB DDR400|Corsair VX450|Seagate ST3500320AS|Samsung SV0411N|LG 22xDVDRW|LG 700S|APC ES500|Altec Lancing AVS300|Logitech MX3200|Logitech QuickCam Connect|Philips SHM6105 |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
El mooooo
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
|
Just stay with Firefox 2. Currently version 3 is not for people who *hate* betas. Hell this is not even beta...it is Alpha. Just run your stable version and enjoy
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: gangtok
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
i think u r correct im not gonna download this |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Salieri Family
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Somewhere in Internet.......Have dynamic IP address
Posts: 353
|
Why its directly 3..Why not 2.1,2.2, or 2.5... Coz firefox had a version 1.5 before releasing 2... Even Winamp once did this..it skipped 4. From Winamp 3 to Winamp 5.
__________________
A person who wants everything in his life... May end up with nothing at all -Tommy[Mafia] |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Microsoft MVP
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: AskVG.com
Posts: 5,173
|
Both versions, 2.0 (and 2.x) and 3.0 (alpha & Betas) will be released & supported simultaneously
In fact v3.0 is under development and it'll take time to be released as final version. |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Commander in Chief
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,657
|
@ the author of http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/open-source/43270-firefox-3-alpha-out.html#post362189
The name Gran Paradiso isnt funny! Its the highest peak of graian alps lol, how is that funny? Its ambitious
__________________
Harsh J www.harshj.com |
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Walking, since 2004.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 926
|
I tried the alpha build. It needs a lot of work. However, the optimized daily dev builds are more stable than Alpha 1.
__________________
Mumbai, I miss you. |
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
El mooooo
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
El mooooo
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
|
Developers have NOT STOPPED developing 2.0 series. Bugs found and performance enhancements will keep going in the series...just that new features will be introduced in 3.0 branch. What is wrong with that?
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|