| Forum |
|
|||||||
| Technology News News from the world of technology that our members stumble across. NOTE: Sources to be mentioned at the beginning of each post. |
| View Poll Results: Are you using Firefox 2.0? | |||
| Yes |
|
59 | 62.11% |
| No |
|
6 | 6.32% |
| Not yet, but I plan to |
|
6 | 6.32% |
| I am using Opera & not plan to install Firefox |
|
19 | 20.00% |
| I am using IE7 & not plan to install Firefox |
|
5 | 5.26% |
| Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
2)The well known memory leak issue, which causes the Firefox browser to consume ever increasing amounts of RAM, eventually leading to sluggish performance and crashes, has been carried over into yet another generation. This is despite an enormous amount of public commentary and user requests for resolution prior to release of a new version of Firefox 3)There are reported problems with the CSS engine in Firefox 2.0, affecting various websites, and making certain features unavailable to surfers. Notable among these is a continued problem with certain aspects of Yahoo! mail 4)Reports indicate that episodes of random freezing during use are worse with the 2.0 version, though a cause has not yet been isolated 5)Numerous users have reported that the History bar is buggy, and that in some instances - for unknown reasons - will not display recent items when the history menu is opened as a side panel |
| Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them. | |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Queensland
Posts: 201
|
Maybe there are 9 reasons http://listvine.com/2006/10/25/9-rea...to-firefox-20/
__________________
http://www.speedtest.net/result/445135884.png http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=821188 |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Macboy
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Goa
Posts: 4,486
|
Me no find any problems with firefox 2. It's quite nice, even without any extensions...(many of which will get their update within the next ten days)
__________________
I'm like a bird... |
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
C# Be Sharp !
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,805
|
yup , i don't use ny rare extensions , so FF2's great for me
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who do not. |
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
C# Be Sharp !
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,805
|
i'm using FF2 , opened 13 tabs , ram consumed == 57 MB
wen 1 tab is open ram consumed == 54 MB , but with ie 7 , with every new tab ram consumed increases approx by 5 MB .
__________________
There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who do not. |
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
firefox without extensions is nothing. even for reloading an image, u need the "show image" extension. Like i said previously, Firefox 2.0 = Firefox 1.5 + extensions.
I M just waiting for the flock skin to be updated Opera is good, but not my type, so i m using IE 7 here, & firefox only if essential |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
i have 10 tabs open across as many sites, still the memory consumption is around 60mb.
__________________
You are a living magnet. What you attract into your life is in harmony with your dominant thoughts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Microsoft MVP
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: AskVG.com
Posts: 5,173
|
Quote:
Though I'm very much liking this new version but the memory problem is very annoying! And I think thats the problem which "NikhilVerma" was facing when he saw "102MB" RAM consuming by ff in Task manager Sometimes ff takes more than 100MB RAM :angry: |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: never land
Posts: 1,284
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
__________________
You are a living magnet. What you attract into your life is in harmony with your dominant thoughts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
HELP AND SUPPORT
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,595
|
I seriously didnt like FF v2.0..Used it for Few days and uninstalled it.
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
mera kutch nahi ho sakta
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Delhi
Posts: 880
|
This is the reason why I don't use firefox, coz no matter how cool they are extensions break on updating!
and firefox without extensions is crap, compared to Opera. |
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 242
|
i have firefoz but its not working,, dunno why,,,,
i connect thru sify cable broadbAND,,, so i have* to use ie6
__________________
think u will never see the devil? look in the mirror and u will see one! |
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: May 2004
Location: India
Posts: 930
|
Quote:
And here is another thing ... I opened a webpage whose size was 97MB ! I can't give the link because some images in the page aren't so friendly ... though the site was http://encyclopediadramatica.com/ { THE SITE CAN CONTAIN 18+ IMAGES } and my memory consumption increased by 645 Megabytes how can a 97MB page take 645 MB in the memory ? I would never know ... Tried the same thing in opera and the memory usage increased by ONLY 110MB ! now that is explainable ... but what's up with firefox ? I don't think it can handle heavy pages at all ... But I guess I have to use it .... No other choice avaliable |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
on my PC, opera/fx comparison memory consumptions are 22mb and 53mb respectively for the same tabs.
__________________
You are a living magnet. What you attract into your life is in harmony with your dominant thoughts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
ex3n1us m4x1mus
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 949
|
Well,
FF has never given me any problems.. I've not had a single crash EVER, since the time I've started using FF. Maybe the credit goes to my 1 gig of RAM. Nonetheless, i find FF2.0 really very good. I had already installed a LOT of extensions in 1.5 which almost made it 2.0 ( The close tabs, undo close tabs n bla bla bla options ) And yea, since FF 2.0 is fairly new, it takes time for the extensions to cope up with it.. Its just a matter of days !
__________________
Uzgimaga |
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
18 Till I Die............
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: India, Mumbai, Marine Lines
Posts: 5,792
|
@NikhilVerma and Vishal Gupta. Have you'll checked if the memory leak isn't with any of the firefox extensions? It had happened to Nemesis, there was a memory leak in one of the extension but it couldn't be made out so everyone was wondering about it.
If you have extensions try disabling one by one and try browsing for a while and see how it goes.
__________________
http://www.bash.org/?258908 |
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: May 2004
Location: India
Posts: 930
|
Well yeah I use like 5~6 extensions :S
But if I remove those then FF is no better ... But thanks for the suggestion I will try disabling them one by one and check it... But can someone else FF2 use try opening a heavy page ? If you have broadband then open the page on encyclopediadramatica ... search for "GIF" in there and open the page ... there are over 200 animated gif's on that page ... can someone try this ? |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|