coreboot will rescue those dead PC's and portable PC's, coreboot will CPR them up and make them breathe and compete.
intel said way back in 2006 80 core CPU and 4 gigs, nothing happened, intel said via UEFI bios will die, coreboot gave them a big middle finger up.

---------- Post added at 04:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:25 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by ico
Whats the point?
UEFI just doesn't bring any significant advantage over BIOS and will over-complicate the things.
What if some companies "limit the control of your hardware" with their EFI?
|
i did try my time with UEFI intel's tianocore, sadly? it sucks. and my laptop c734tu's specs are not fully released for coreboot. the coreboot hackers are on their way to find a solution, i salute them.
and secondly? uefi can/can-not be centrally controlled. you can add the tcp stack in it, both in 32 bit and 64 bit mode. but you can also bypass it easily. how? well i got this laptop with freedos, slic 2.0 for vista was disabled, i enabled it and also i injected slic 2.1 for windows 7. big deal.
if you know how to decompress the squashfs tarball of your bios? you can add and remove each and every components.