 |
02-05-2009, 04:21 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
EXIT: DATA Junkyard
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,019
|
HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
Price of lowest priced HD4770s and HD4890:-
2x HD4770 @ 6.6k each = Rs. 13,200
HD4890 @ 16.2k each = Rs. 16,200
Now, if you compare this review to the result of other cards, you'll find HD4770 X2(as I prefer to say) actually beats these cards:-
- HD4890
- GTX275
- GTX285
And sometimes matches HD4870 X2. Now for Rs. 13,200, what more can you ask for!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
02-05-2009, 05:17 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Bond, Desi Bond!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 10,035
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
Damn it. Crossfire is really fired up now. Good to see a sub 7k card based setup pawning high end cards
@compaddict, Thanks a ton for this post
This means that this CF setup is much better than buying a single 17k-20k card.
__________________
My first blogspace: http://desiibond.blogspot.com
|
|
|
03-05-2009, 10:05 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
EXIT: DATA Junkyard
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,019
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
It actually looks like it. I mean till yesterday we wudn't think of a card tht performed as good as GTX 285 in a 50-55k rig. Now, tht's possible.
|
|
|
06-05-2009, 09:14 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
EXIT: DATA Junkyard
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,019
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
^^the results are disappointing in front of a GTX295
|
|
|
07-05-2009, 01:16 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
IronMan; Ready to Roll...
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Metal City
Posts: 1,273
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
As I gather, Crossfire is still more efficient than SLI?
Where has the Hybrid-Crossfire, (SLI?) story reached till now?
__________________
Aluminum MacBook 2.0GHz Collector's Edition
Windows Box: 2.26G P4, 1GiB RAM, 320GB SATA + 80GB PATA HDD, Nvidia FX5200
AOC Fovi F22
iPod Touch 16GiB, HTC Gene, Moto W230, Sansa Express
|
|
|
07-05-2009, 08:28 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
I WANT MORE FPS!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Shifted to Hydreabad from Mumbai
Posts: 494
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
Quote:
Originally Posted by desiibond
Damn it. Crossfire is really fired up now. Good to see a sub 7k card based setup pawning high end cards
@compaddict, Thanks a ton for this post
This means that this CF setup is much better than buying a single 17k-20k card.
|
No, you will have to upgrade mobo to 16x xfire one, psu and still get only fps increase. The problem is micro stuttering is visible when games goes from 60 fps to 40 fps. So your min fps requirement goes upto 60 compared to 30-35 for single card. Until is AFR synchronization is researched multi GPU setup is useless unless you are doing GPU computing on both cards or running PhysX(nVidia) with 2nd card.
__________________
E8500+Asus P5Q Pro, GTX280 OC, 4GB RAM+RAID0 2*WD 500GB, CM690+Corsair 650TX, Razer Diamondback+Goliathus Control Edition Omega, Microsoft Natural Ergonomic 4000, Dell E228WFP, X-Fi Titanium+T6060
|
|
|
07-05-2009, 04:39 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
EXIT: DATA Junkyard
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,019
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
i can't see stutterring when I get 26fps, forget micro stutterring.
|
|
|
07-05-2009, 05:07 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
IronMan; Ready to Roll...
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Metal City
Posts: 1,273
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
Quote:
|
No, you will have to upgrade mobo to 16x xfire one, psu and still get only fps increase. The problem is micro stuttering is visible when games goes from 60 fps to 40 fps. So your min fps requirement goes upto 60 compared to 30-35 for single card. Until is AFR synchronization is researched multi GPU setup is useless unless you are doing GPU computing on both cards or running PhysX(nVidia) with 2nd card.
|
Micro-stuttering? Is that exclusive to 2-card setups?
__________________
Aluminum MacBook 2.0GHz Collector's Edition
Windows Box: 2.26G P4, 1GiB RAM, 320GB SATA + 80GB PATA HDD, Nvidia FX5200
AOC Fovi F22
iPod Touch 16GiB, HTC Gene, Moto W230, Sansa Express
|
|
|
07-05-2009, 09:55 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shhhh!!!!! on a sniper point
Posts: 4,200
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
yup, but most of todays cards dun show these micro-stuttering.
and also when 3870X2 was released, ATI said they have completely fixed the micro-stuttering on their X2 cards.
it was clerly notieceble during old card days like 6800GT and 7xxx from nvidia and X1800/1900 from ATI.
now with better drivers, that aint a problem.
and 2*4770 cfx still consumes less power with 40nm. and X2 will be even more efficient.
__________________
G1: PII X4 B50 4.0 | TRUE 120*2 | TA790GXB A2+ | 4GB DDR2 GSkill 1200 | Audigy 2 | HD4870 | HEC 550 | MX 518.
G2: AII 240 | M2N 68AM+ | 3GB| 8800GT | Zebby Plat 500
G3: XPS M1530 |
FZ 16.
|
|
|
08-05-2009, 10:43 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
EXIT: DATA Junkyard
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,019
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
You know, ATi should launch two cards:-
HD4890 X2 2GB
HD4770 X2 2GB
Now, I said HD4890 X2 cuz today I read that DX11 GT300 and DX11 RV870 aren't going to come till Q4 2009.
|
|
|
08-05-2009, 12:33 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Bond, Desi Bond!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 10,035
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
that push to Q4 could also be due to dx11 development on windows from MS???
It's better to release those cards when MS win7 is stabilized and dx11 on win7 works.
__________________
My first blogspace: http://desiibond.blogspot.com
|
|
|
08-05-2009, 03:49 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
EXIT: DATA Junkyard
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,019
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
^^Yup, otherwise it wud be like the 8800GTX card, DX10 but no DX10 game for another year after release.
|
|
|
08-05-2009, 10:10 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
A LOTR fan
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,173
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
yup, let the dx games come to market first.
__________________
How many kilometers are there from washington Dc to Miami beach?????....;)
unban praka123!!!....
|
|
|
08-05-2009, 10:24 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shhhh!!!!! on a sniper point
Posts: 4,200
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
nope, let the cards gets released ASAP, and itll get matured enuf while DX11 games become common and win7 supports it completely.
and itll bring down current cards cost and we can enjoys todays games better.
__________________
G1: PII X4 B50 4.0 | TRUE 120*2 | TA790GXB A2+ | 4GB DDR2 GSkill 1200 | Audigy 2 | HD4870 | HEC 550 | MX 518.
G2: AII 240 | M2N 68AM+ | 3GB| 8800GT | Zebby Plat 500
G3: XPS M1530 |
FZ 16.
|
|
|
13-05-2009, 04:14 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
EXIT: DATA Junkyard
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,019
|
Re: HD 4770 CFx beats HD4890 SWEET!
^^just like DX10 cards were finally able to play DX9 games with full settings(even now a 15k DX10 card can't play CRYSIS at DX9 settings and rest maxed out properly), so with DX11 cards, DX10 gaming will finally become fully possible.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|