|
View Poll Results: Best technology with crisp music at low bitrates
|
|
AAC
|
   
|
3 |
13.04% |
|
AAC+
|
  
|
2 |
8.70% |
|
eAAC+
|
  
|
3 |
13.04% |
|
HE-AAC
|
  
|
1 |
4.35% |
|
AAC Loseless(Used by Apple for audio coding)
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
AC3
|
  
|
1 |
4.35% |
|
Mp4/M4p
|
|
1 |
4.35% |
|
FLAC
|
|
0 |
0% |
|
Ogg Vorbis/Ogg
|
|
10 |
43.48% |
|
Mp3/Mp3Pro
|
|
2 |
8.70% |
 |
|
24-11-2007, 09:02 AM
|
 #1 (permalink)
|
|
"The Gentleman"
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
|
AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
We have so many audio coding tech... AAC/AAC+/eAAC+/HE-AAC/AAC
Loseless/AC3/Mp4/M4p/FLAC/MP3/MP3pro/OGG... I wanna know which among them can
incorporate best music quality, playing every type of music/instrument crisply at low bitrate.
there are few synonyms also, would like to know them too if you guys know do mention it.
__________________
"The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offense."
- Dijkstra
Last edited by vish786; 24-11-2007 at 10:21 PM.
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 09:03 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Dreamweaver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 3,904
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
mp3 and AAC
__________________
Today's noobs are tomorrow's geeks. Don't make fun of them.. encourage them. - Gigacore
Follow me on twitter.com/gigacore
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 09:11 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
TechTin.com
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: www.TechTin.com
Posts: 4,090
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
AAC will give best...
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 09:15 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
mp3 and AAC is the best
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 09:29 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
"The Gentleman"
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
what about higher versions of AAC like AACplus & all, practically its suppose to be better than AAC.
__________________
"The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offense."
- Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 09:47 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
yes
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 09:56 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
"The Gentleman"
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vaibhavtek
yes
|
what yes ? u said AAC is best & now said AAC+ is best... dont contradict your own statements. 
__________________
"The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offense."
- Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:02 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
AAC + is best
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:58 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Wahahaha~!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pune/there
Posts: 7,680
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
ogg vorbis
The same is used in games, mostly.
check out
Last edited by Faun; 24-11-2007 at 05:29 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:59 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
left this forum longback
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
why oh why!if mp3(franchofer institute needs royalty be paid by companies) is preferred then why not ogg vorbis(free!),anytime it is better!
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 11:19 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
!FREEWARES!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 1,077
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
eAAC+ needs less space and gives gud quality.
__________________
MBP 13.3";
PC: Core i-5 2400, Intel H67, GSkill 4GB DDR3, Sapphire 6850 Toxic, 1TB HDD, Samsung P2370
Steam (Cod-MW2 only) - akshay81
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 11:22 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Rubik's Uncle!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು (Bengaluru)
Posts: 3,790
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
AAC
@Vish add a poll
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 11:27 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
The Researcher
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 1,122
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
AAC and Ogg vorbis Both are free and best.
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 11:29 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Beneath The Eyelids
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 289
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
if its about quality then i prefer FLAC, have around 20% of my music in flac and another 25% or so in "Monkey's Audio". Loseless is the way to go if you're an audiophile. 
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 12:03 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Human Spambot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Aamchi Mumbai !!!
Posts: 4,227
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
AAC + & Ogg are the best.
__________________
ShutterTux - Photography, Linux & Life! : http://shuttertux.wordpress.com
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 12:13 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Google Bot
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,772
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Mp3, Aac, eaac+, ogg vorbis
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 03:34 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,432
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Ogg AoTuV. The best quality even at 64 kbps.
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 03:53 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
God of Mistakes...
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pune, Maharashtra
Posts: 1,923
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Everyone is saying this is best.. that is best....
Can anyone please give some links for justification ??
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 03:53 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Human Spambot
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Expert Planet
Posts: 2,480
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vish786
incorporate best music quality, playing every type of music/instrument crisply at low bitrate.
there are few synonyms also, would like to know them too if you guys know do mention it.
|
eaac+ = he aac v2 which is the best low bitrate codec compared to ANY codec availabe till now .
@ 64 kbps and below it cannot be beaten by any of the codecs availabe ..
Thanks
Regards.....
Expertno.1
__________________
Off From Digit Forum for some months.....busy
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 05:28 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Wahahaha~!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pune/there
Posts: 7,680
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by shirish_nagar
Everyone is saying this is best.. that is best....
Can anyone please give some links for justification ??
|
yeah i hav given.
Read the damn post.
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 05:40 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Pawned!... Beyond GODLIKE
Join Date: May 2006
Location: World Of Warcraft -DOTA
Posts: 1,051
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by expertno.1
eaac+ = he aac v2 which is the best low bitrate codec compared to ANY codec availabe till now .
@ 64 kbps and below it cannot be beaten by any of the codecs availabe ..
Thanks
Regards.....
Expertno.1
|
then is the 64/128/192kbps of eAAC+ is better than 256/320(or more)kbps of other codecs like mp3, wma,ogg???
__________________
If God has indeed created Himself in His own image, then I submit to you that God is a cockroach :mrgreen:!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 06:59 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
I see right through you.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chennai
Posts: 597
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_file_format
Best Quality : Exactly as Chester said, FLAC and Monkey's Audio are lossless, so they are the best by definition.
Most Ubiquitous : MP3
ogg is the same (as far as quality goes) as mp3.
__________________
I didn't make the world, I only try to live in it.
http://lucentbeing.com
-- Sykora --
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:07 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
"The Gentleman"
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Charan
AAC
@Vish add a poll
|
Poll Added.
is Ogg different from Ogg Vorbis ?
& for info Ogg Vorbis requires more bitrates for good music when compared to AAC
__________________
"The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offense."
- Dijkstra
Last edited by vish786; 24-11-2007 at 10:11 PM.
Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:11 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Wire muncher!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,164
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Personal exp: eAAC+ below 64kbps
AAC above 64kbps.
__________________
"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good."
http://phoenix-ani.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:15 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
"The Gentleman"
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Read This... MPEG-4 AAC vs MP3 vs Ogg
AAC has to be above 160 kbps, but i'm yet doubtful about remaining higher AAC versions.
__________________
"The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offense."
- Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:15 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
You gave been GXified
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,633
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
I prefer WMA for computers & m4a AAC for phone
__________________
about.me/gxsaurav
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:17 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
"The Gentleman"
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
WMA again requires huge space thats the reason I didnt mention it.
__________________
"The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offense."
- Dijkstra
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:20 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
left this forum longback
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
isnt ogg vorbis a good replacement for mp3?I have my all songs(not all infact  ) converted into ogg vorbis.
and does MIDI too be a option?
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:28 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
"The Gentleman"
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,434
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by praka123
isnt ogg vorbis a good replacement for mp3?I have my all songs(not all infact ) converted into ogg vorbis.
and does MIDI too be a option? |
converting mp3 into ogg wont help, its gonna yield same mp3 quality ,if your converting them to ogg it should be a Clean Source. Its always recommended to convert a music from higher bitrate to low but not from lower bitrate to high of different format or same one.
__________________
"The use of COBOL cripples the mind; its teaching should, therefore, be regarded as a criminal offense."
- Dijkstra
Last edited by vish786; 24-11-2007 at 10:37 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 10:30 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
left this forum longback
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
|
Re: AAC,eAAC,AAC+,eAAC+,HE-AAC,AAC Loseless,AC3,Mp4,M4p,FLAC,MP3,OGG
and what about MIDI isnt it the lightest when made?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wikipedia english
MIDI (Musical Instrument Digital Interface, IPA: /ˈmɪdi/) is an industry-standard protocol that enables electronic musical instruments, computers and other equipment to communicate, control and synchronize with each other.
MIDI does not transmit an audio signal or media — it simply transmits digital data "event messages" such as the pitch and intensity of musical notes to play, control signals for parameters such as volume, vibrato and panning, cues and clock signals to set the tempo. As an electronic protocol, it is notable for its success, both in its widespread adoption throughout the industry, and in remaining essentially unchanged in the face of technological developments since its introduction in 1983.
|
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
