Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003

abhipal · 17-02-2007, 12:58 AM

Lately I heard from many people that windows server 2003 is better than Windows XP....

1) It does not slow down.
2) It is more faster.
3) You get more fps if you play in 2003 than in XP.
4) More reliable.

18-02-2007, 06:14 AM

i agree. i'm using server 2003 standard edition on my p3 cpu mhz with no problem it runs faster than any other os i installed earlier.

cool_techie_tvm · 18-02-2007, 06:31 PM

Another Server 2003 user in here!!

AshishSharma · 18-02-2007, 06:38 PM

Windows 2003 is a Server Operating System while Windows XP is a Desktop Operating System.

Server OS are designed for performance and stability while desktop OS are designed for ease of use, good looks and user friendly features.

So comparisons between the two is probably not correct .... nd if speed is all u seek then go for the thinnest Linux Disto and have all ur system resources to spare ....

n2casey · 18-02-2007, 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AshishSharma

Windows 2003 is a Server Operating System while Windows XP is a Desktop Operating System.

Server OS are designed for performance and stability while desktop OS are designed for ease of use, good looks and user friendly features.

So comparisons between the two is probably not correct .... nd if speed is all u seek then go for the thinnest Linux Disto and have all ur system resources to spare ....

Agree with u. There isn't any comparison btwn both & Ya the thinnest Linux will help to spare resources.

abhipal · 18-02-2007, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AshishSharma

Windows 2003 is a Server Operating System while Windows XP is a Desktop Operating System.

Server OS are designed for performance and stability while desktop OS are designed for ease of use, good looks and user friendly features.

So comparisons between the two is probably not correct .... nd if speed is all u seek then go for the thinnest Linux Disto and have all ur system resources to spare ....

I also agree with you about the desktop OS but it is not like this that server OS are not for "ease of use, good looks and user friendly features". We can use them on Home PCs also.

27-02-2008, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abhipal

I also agree with you about the desktop OS but it is not like this that server OS are not for "ease of use, good looks and user friendly features". We can use them on Home PCs also.

like i use it on my old p3. its better than xp running on my another p4 desktop

VexByte · 03-03-2008, 03:18 PM

2003 is a nice OS for desktops !

See this :

http://win2k3.msfn.org/

**MetalheadGautham** · 03-03-2008, 03:24 PM

dude, in linux you can't play directx games easily

ppl these days are looking for the best gaming OS to be installed in their PC. Vista is ONLY for DX 10+, as its slow in DX 9 games. So we all fall back to Windows XP, as win 98 and 2000 can't run most of the games. If windows server 2003 is better at gaming, whats wrong with switching to it ?

dOm1naTOr · 03-03-2008, 03:44 PM

but when i installed 2003 once[2 yrs back], it refused to run some apps and games. It gives an error " this apps is not server compatible" or somethin like that.
Its faster coz it dun have any visuals or eyecandies like in XP. But for certain s/w to run, it nees server liscence or multiple client liscence even for some pirated s/w.

axxo · 07-03-2008, 02:14 AM

Try Windows 2003 and you will forget xp until you run into compatibility issues later with any of your software.

kumarmohit · 07-03-2008, 03:27 AM

Hmm wat abt the drivers?

dOm1naTOr · 07-03-2008, 07:36 AM

ull get drivers for 2003, if the h/w is from well known brand like asus, MSI, nvidia, ATI etc
but ull heve hard time finding drivers for cheap lan cards and similar peripherals

axxo · 07-03-2008, 12:50 PM

99% of xp/2000 drivers work for 2003..

Choto Cheeta · 07-03-2008, 01:01 PM

Man I cant stop laughing

really sorry...

anyway Windows XP will run as fast as Server 2003 or better when you turn off all needed desktop services to just keep those which comes default with Server 2003...

Server 2003 and Windows Xp are completelly 2 different OS for 2 different purpose... Server do NOT concentrate to provide a better Desktop exp for the end user, therefore all those Resource hungry services which makes you think Slowing windows XP down is by default turned off in Server 2003.. It concentrate more on Background apps and network and Terminal apps and such and such which are needed for a server...

Manually start all those services which is availble on XP, and there you go, you can see Server 2003 is also slowing down like XP...

gcbeldar · 07-03-2008, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Choto Cheeta

Man I cant stop laughing

really sorry...

anyway Windows XP will run as fast as Server 2003 or better when you turn off all needed desktop services to just keep those which comes default with Server 2003...

Server 2003 and Windows Xp are completelly 2 different OS for 2 different purpose... Server do NOT concentrate to provide a better Desktop exp for the end user, therefore all those Resource hungry services which makes you think Slowing windows XP down is by default turned off in Server 2003.. It concentrate more on Background apps and network and Terminal apps and such and such which are needed for a server...

Manually start all those services which is availble on XP, and there you go, you can see Server 2003 is also slowing down like XP...

Choto Cheeta Sir,

Suggest me to disable unwanted services in xp.

victor_rambo · 07-03-2008, 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcbeldar

Choto Cheeta Sir,

Suggest me to disable unwanted services in xp.

yeah, tell it ........my XP pro has been testing my patience lately !

infra_red_dude · 07-03-2008, 02:13 PM

^^^ Just search for BlackViper's windows' services guide. Thats a very good starting point to speed up your windows.

AshishSharma · 07-03-2008, 09:49 PM

As I said long back in the thread, a Server operating system is absolutely different from a desktop one and comparison between the two is not justified .... Yes I've myself found Windows Server 2003 performing better bcz it's a server and has been designed for performance whereas Windows XP is a desktop OS designed for rich user experience ... so basically if u strip off all the extra features off XP u get down to the same core features and performance ....

Choto Cheeta · 07-03-2008, 10:23 PM

Hey Ani, our dear Mr. Vista is also writting good tutorials on making your Xp faster

here is what he was talking about.. http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/servicecfg.htm and http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/supertweaks.htm

Guys go through his tutorial here

http://www.askvg.com/master-tutorial...xp-super-fast/
http://www.askvg.com/category/windows-xp/

17-02-2007, 12:58 AM	#1 (permalink)
abhipal Broken In Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 150	Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 Lately I heard from many people that windows server 2003 is better than Windows XP.... 1) It does not slow down. 2) It is more faster. 3) You get more fps if you play in 2003 than in XP. 4) More reliable.

18-02-2007, 06:14 AM	#2 (permalink)
priyadarshi Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 i agree. i'm using server 2003 standard edition on my p3 cpu mhz with no problem it runs faster than any other os i installed earlier.

18-02-2007, 06:31 PM	#3 (permalink)
cool_techie_tvm Alpha Geek Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 543	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 Another Server 2003 user in here!!

18-02-2007, 06:38 PM	#4 (permalink)
AshishSharma Livin' in the ghetto Join Date: May 2006 Location: Hmm .... Home Posts: 309	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 Windows 2003 is a Server Operating System while Windows XP is a Desktop Operating System. Server OS are designed for performance and stability while desktop OS are designed for ease of use, good looks and user friendly features. So comparisons between the two is probably not correct .... nd if speed is all u seek then go for the thinnest Linux Disto and have all ur system resources to spare .... __________________ ~.~ Never argue with idiots, they just drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. ~.~

03-03-2008, 03:18 PM	#8 (permalink)
VexByte Norms Buster Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Bangy Posts: 317	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 2003 is a nice OS for desktops ! See this : http://win2k3.msfn.org/

Popular Categories

Popular Articles

Content Categories

Sister Sites

Follow Us

Facebook Channels

Digit Magazine

	Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

03-03-2008, 03:24 PM	#9 (permalink)
MetalheadGautham The Smaller Bang Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Gautham City Posts: 7,431	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 dude, in linux you can't play directx games easily ppl these days are looking for the best gaming OS to be installed in their PC. Vista is ONLY for DX 10+, as its slow in DX 9 games. So we all fall back to Windows XP, as win 98 and 2000 can't run most of the games. If windows server 2003 is better at gaming, whats wrong with switching to it ? __________________ http://TheSmallerBang.wordpress.com eMachines E725 - T4400 2.2GHz, 1GB, 160GB Nokia 5130XM * T-Sonic 610 2GB Nokia 2323C * Samsung Galaxy Y Apple iPad 2 16GB WiFi

03-03-2008, 03:44 PM	#10 (permalink)
dOm1naTOr Wise Old Owl Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: shhhh!!!!! on a sniper point Posts: 4,151	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 but when i installed 2003 once[2 yrs back], it refused to run some apps and games. It gives an error " this apps is not server compatible" or somethin like that. Its faster coz it dun have any visuals or eyecandies like in XP. But for certain s/w to run, it nees server liscence or multiple client liscence even for some pirated s/w. __________________ G1: PII X4 B50 4.0 \| TRUE 120*2 \| TA790GXB A2+ \| 4GB DDR2 GSkill 1200 \| Audigy 2 \| HD4870 \| HEC 550 \| MX 518. G2: AII 240 \| M2N 68AM+ \| 3GB\| 8800GT \| Zebby Plat 500 G3: XPS M1530 \| FZ 16.

07-03-2008, 02:14 AM	#11 (permalink)
axxo 99.9% Idle Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 775	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 Try Windows 2003 and you will forget xp until you run into compatibility issues later with any of your software.

07-03-2008, 03:27 AM	#12 (permalink)
kumarmohit Human Spambot Join Date: May 2005 Location: Riding an Oliphaunt Posts: 2,165	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 Hmm wat abt the drivers? __________________ The real and only freedom is Public Domain. Everything else in unfree! Even those who claim to be the self styled evangelists of freedom are not free because freedom cannot be forced by any means!

07-03-2008, 07:36 AM	#13 (permalink)
dOm1naTOr Wise Old Owl Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: shhhh!!!!! on a sniper point Posts: 4,151	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 ull get drivers for 2003, if the h/w is from well known brand like asus, MSI, nvidia, ATI etc but ull heve hard time finding drivers for cheap lan cards and similar peripherals __________________ G1: PII X4 B50 4.0 \| TRUE 120*2 \| TA790GXB A2+ \| 4GB DDR2 GSkill 1200 \| Audigy 2 \| HD4870 \| HEC 550 \| MX 518. G2: AII 240 \| M2N 68AM+ \| 3GB\| 8800GT \| Zebby Plat 500 G3: XPS M1530 \| FZ 16.

07-03-2008, 12:50 PM	#14 (permalink)
axxo 99.9% Idle Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 775	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 99% of xp/2000 drivers work for 2003..

07-03-2008, 01:01 PM	#15 (permalink)
Choto Cheeta Rebooting Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: 220.225.82.33 Posts: 6,200	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 Man I cant stop laughing really sorry... anyway Windows XP will run as fast as Server 2003 or better when you turn off all needed desktop services to just keep those which comes default with Server 2003... Server 2003 and Windows Xp are completelly 2 different OS for 2 different purpose... Server do NOT concentrate to provide a better Desktop exp for the end user, therefore all those Resource hungry services which makes you think Slowing windows XP down is by default turned off in Server 2003.. It concentrate more on Background apps and network and Terminal apps and such and such which are needed for a server... Manually start all those services which is availble on XP, and there you go, you can see Server 2003 is also slowing down like XP... __________________ rebooting ChotoCheeta.com

07-03-2008, 02:13 PM	#18 (permalink)
infra_red_dude Wire muncher! Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,164	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 ^^^ Just search for BlackViper's windows' services guide. Thats a very good starting point to speed up your windows. __________________ "The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." http://phoenix-ani.blogspot.com

07-03-2008, 09:49 PM	#19 (permalink)
AshishSharma Livin' in the ghetto Join Date: May 2006 Location: Hmm .... Home Posts: 309	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 As I said long back in the thread, a Server operating system is absolutely different from a desktop one and comparison between the two is not justified .... Yes I've myself found Windows Server 2003 performing better bcz it's a server and has been designed for performance whereas Windows XP is a desktop OS designed for rich user experience ... so basically if u strip off all the extra features off XP u get down to the same core features and performance .... __________________ ~.~ Never argue with idiots, they just drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. ~.~

07-03-2008, 10:23 PM	#20 (permalink)
Choto Cheeta Rebooting Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: 220.225.82.33 Posts: 6,200	Re: Windows XP vs Windows Server 2003 Hey Ani, our dear Mr. Vista is also writting good tutorials on making your Xp faster here is what he was talking about.. http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/servicecfg.htm and http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/supertweaks.htm Guys go through his tutorial here http://www.askvg.com/master-tutorial...xp-super-fast/ http://www.askvg.com/category/windows-xp/ __________________ rebooting ChotoCheeta.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode