You probably havent used it extensively enough that you are commenting like this.
I have noticed it is uneffective in virus infected. In clean pc with a good ammount of ram it works fine.
For virus infected pc's Malwarebytes and Housecall are things to use.
Dude i've used it for an year on all my home computers (i bought a five user license). It requires a decent setup at least. Old laptops,computers and netbooks slow down even more because of it. I installed it on a reformatted laptop and netbook and the systems slowed down quite a bit. Also everytime we i needed to scan any file it always scanned the memory first (which was extremely irritating). So lets just say, my experience with quickheal =
__________________
Nothing is true. Everything is permitted.
Dude i've used it for an year on all my home computers (i bought a five user license). It requires a decent setup at least. Old laptops,computers and netbooks slow down even more because of it. I installed it on a reformatted laptop and netbook and the systems slowed down quite a bit. Also everytime we i needed to scan any file it always scanned the memory first (which was extremely irritating). So lets just say, my experience with quickheal =
+1. I had a nightmare installing the 60-day trial that came with Digit. Although their customer support is excellent (with call support for all users).
__________________
Quote:
“The Web is like a dominatrix. Everywhere I turn, I see little buttons ordering me to Submit.”
ASUS P5KPL AM/PS | P4 @ 3.07GHz | Ubuntu 11.04 / Win Server 2k8 / XP SP3 | 1GB DDR2 | Samsung HD080HJ 80GB
i use both. Malwarebytes detection is solid. hardly any false positive. Emsisoft's 1/4th warning are falsepositive but scanning is fast & can scan inside compressed files. use both as a scanner or you may go for full version of Malwarebytes.
Which is better---malwarebytes OR Emisoft antimalware?
Malwarebytes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshiks7
Can I use both of them?
Yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshiks7
Which is better---Speed my PC OR Tune Up Utilities 2011?
TuneUp Utilities. But I usually use seperate programs for all utilities and get the job done for free. Like Glary Utilities, Ccleaner, Auslogics Disk Defrag.
__________________
In war, Victory. In peace, Vigilance. In death, Sacrifice.
Using TDF through mobile. Digit optimized this forum for mobiles. Works nicely YAY :D:D
I hear lots of people
here discussing about spybot etc.. Any suggestions?
Install=
1. Spybot Search&Destroy for occasional scan(once a week) and immunisation. The real time protection doesnt let anything go by unmissed and always gives a popup during registry change
2. Malwarebytes Antimalware for regular use. But free version doesnt have realtime protection.
Looking for a change should I opt for Avira or Avast?
I would suggest Avira. But both are very good. Avira is very simple and basic and less resource hungry where Avast is full of features and all but sometimes gives problems.
__________________
In war, Victory. In peace, Vigilance. In death, Sacrifice.
Using TDF through mobile. Digit optimized this forum for mobiles. Works nicely YAY :D:D
yes. used MSE & like its clean interface. some may feel it lacks controls but the protection is solid. for those who don't want to tweak & check every avl settings, MSE is for them (not for me).
I would suggest Avira. But both are very good. Avira is very simple and basic and less resource hungry where Avast is full of features and all but sometimes gives problems.
I remember myself using Avira during 2004,5,6 .. Those days it was very good ..
Nowadays ... I get troubled with it !
Too much of false positive .. Whenever i use a crack it flags it as malware ...
And being Disturbed I wanted to test the engine of Avira with the MDL malware links
Almost 50% went through ...
I felt ashamed When i Tried to recover my friend's infected PC with Avira free .. It miserably Failed ..
avast boot scan saved my day ..
Now experimentally satisfied with avast ..
Hopefully that Doesn't interfere with my gaming .. Even avcomparitives ranked
avast in performance advanced+
I remember myself using Avira during 2004,5,6 .. Those days it was very good ..
Nowadays ... I get troubled with it !
Too much of false positive .. Whenever i use a crack it flags it as malware ...
And being Disturbed I wanted to test the engine of Avira with the MDL malware links
Almost 50% went through ...
I felt ashamed When i Tried to recover my friend's infected PC with Avira free .. It miserably Failed ..
avast boot scan saved my day ..
Now experimentally satisfied with avast ..
Hopefully that Doesn't interfere with my gaming .. Even avcomparitives ranked
avast in performance advanced+
Is flagging a crack as malware a false positive? Almost every AV do it since ages.
Yes. Avast is nowadays far better than Avira. I remember couple of years ago my AV (forget which one I had installed at that time) was having problems with with TeraCopy. And the conflict with Nirsoft utilities is well-known.