Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > News > Random News
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Random News Non-technology news that you feel members should know about. NOTE: Sources to be mentioned at the beginning of each post.


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2007, 12:33 PM   #1 (permalink)
The Devil's Advocate
 
iMav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Masti Ki Paathshaala
Posts: 7,019
Default Are CFLs that good ...


came across this peice of article following some links ...

Quote:
"According to an April 12 article in The Ellsworth American, Brandy Bridges had the misfortune of breaking a CFL during installation in her daughter's bedroom: It dropped and shattered on the carpeted floor. Aware that CFLs contain potentially hazardous substances, Bridges called her local Home Depot for advice. The store told her that the CFL contained mercury and that she should call the Poison Control hotline, which in turn directed her to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.

The DEP sent a specialist to Bridges' house to test for mercury contamination. The specialist found mercury levels in the bedroom in excess of six times the state's "safe" level for mercury contamination of 300 billionths of a gram per cubic meter. The DEP specialist recommended that Bridges call an environmental cleanup firm, which reportedly gave her a "low-ball" estimate of US$2,000 to clean up the room. The room then was sealed off with plastic and Bridges began "gathering finances" to pay for the US$2,000 cleaning. Reportedly, her insurance company wouldn't cover the cleanup costs because mercury is a pollutant.

As each CFL contains five milligrams of mercury, at the Maine "safety" standard of 300 nanograms per cubic meter, it would take 16,667 cubic meters of soil to "safely" contain all the mercury in a single CFL. While CFL vendors and environmentalists tout the energy cost savings of CFLs, they conveniently omit the personal and societal costs of CFL disposal."
and isnt it true that they keep on saying save electricity and use CFL ... it shud ... save urself and dont use CFL

http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardwar.../1231202.shtml
__________________
"The problem that shows up with the three red lights on the console is a complex interaction with some very complex parts.” - Robbie Bach

http://beingmanan.com
twitter: manan | Last.FM: manan
iMav is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 05-10-2007, 12:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
AJJU
 
azzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: hYdErAbAd
Posts: 2,428
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

not so ...........
i do like CFL's there good source of light
but proper caring shud be taken
__________________
I love and Live to Design
azzu is offline  
Old 05-10-2007, 09:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
Alpha Geek
 
hailgautam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 763
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

In india we are hardly bothered about all this.
__________________
Change is Nature, the part that we can influence; and it starts when we decide.

Where you going?
With Luck forward.
hailgautam is offline  
Old 05-10-2007, 09:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
The Devil's Advocate
 
iMav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Masti Ki Paathshaala
Posts: 7,019
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

dude with kids around .... mercury is potentially very very dangerous
__________________
"The problem that shows up with the three red lights on the console is a complex interaction with some very complex parts.” - Robbie Bach

http://beingmanan.com
twitter: manan | Last.FM: manan
iMav is offline  
Old 06-10-2007, 09:37 AM   #5 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lat 28.38°N , Longt 77.13°E
Posts: 2,431
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

CFLs are becoming famous as their prices are falling but they are hazardous as they contain mercury. Next in line are LED lamps which consume even less power and contain no mercury. But they are very expensive for now , rs. 500-600 for bulb which are equivalent to 40 watt old type bulbs
ThinkFree is offline  
Old 06-10-2007, 10:24 AM   #6 (permalink)
You'r Born Free
 
int86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ranchi
Posts: 425
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

Still to see Led bulb at my place
__________________
# Money, Beauty and Configration has no ends.
# Life is like game sometimes. Play it or loose it. But keep the spirit of game.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_Information_Act
int86 is offline  
Old 06-10-2007, 10:26 AM   #7 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Nav11aug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kharagpur for now
Posts: 362
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by iMav
dude with kids around .... mercury is potentially very very dangerous
hv a clinical thermometer at home? and more reachable than a light i guess
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/NOLFxceptMe/
http://naveendageek.blogspot.com

Back after a long time. And well, EndSems screwed up as usual :)
Nav11aug is offline  
Old 06-10-2007, 04:25 PM   #8 (permalink)
ToTheBeatOfUrHeart
 
Harvik780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston,Newyork
Posts: 1,882
Smile Re: Are CFLs that good ...

Very good info.
__________________
Mobo - P5N32-E SLI,P5N-E SLI|GFX - 2x8800GTS,8800GT|Processor - E6550,E6600|PSU - CM EP 600,HX620W|Physics - 2x8600GT
Harvik780 is offline  
Old 06-10-2007, 05:09 PM   #9 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
Cool G5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Aamchi Mumbai !!!
Posts: 4,227
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

Thanks didn't knew this.Anyways i don't use CFL.I don't mind on paying a few extra rupees than to pay thousand on hospital bill.Guys be careful.
__________________
ShutterTux - Photography, Linux & Life! : http://shuttertux.wordpress.com
Cool G5 is offline  
Old 06-10-2007, 05:09 PM   #10 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
Cool G5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Aamchi Mumbai !!!
Posts: 4,227
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

Thanks didn't knew this.Anyways i don't use CFL.I don't mind on paying a few extra rupees than to pay thousand on hospital bill.Guys be careful.
__________________
ShutterTux - Photography, Linux & Life! : http://shuttertux.wordpress.com
Cool G5 is offline  
Old 07-10-2007, 02:08 PM   #11 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lat 28.38°N , Longt 77.13°E
Posts: 2,431
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by int86
Still to see Led bulb at my place
You won't be able to see it for 2-3 more years as was the case with CFLs 6-7 years ago. They are too expensive
ThinkFree is offline  
Old 07-10-2007, 02:50 PM   #12 (permalink)
The Transcendental
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nutopia
Posts: 285
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

This looks like FUD.
Even tube lights contain the same amount (if not more) of mercury. Every fluorescent lamp or cathode ray tube (including your monitor) which contain the phosphor coating contains mercury. (i guess it helps in chelating the phosphor to the glass)

Any case, don't buy the cheap chinese unbranded ones.
I do agree however that there should be strict industrial norms.

From Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_fluorescent_lamp:


Mercury use of compact fluorescent lamp vs. incandescent lamp when powered by electricity generated from coal.

Code:
Mercury emissions

 CFLs, like all fluorescent lamps (e.g., long tubular lamps common in offices and kitchens), contain small amounts of mercury[24][25] and it is a concern for landfills and waste incinerators where the mercury from lamps may be released and contribute to air and water pollution. In the USA, lighting manufacturer members of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) have made a voluntary commitment to cap the amount of mercury used in CFLs:
Under the voluntary commitment, effective April 15, 2007, NEMA members will cap the total mercury content in CFLs of less than 25 watts at 5 milligrams (mg) per unit. The total mercury content of CFLs that use 25 to 40 watts of electricity will be capped at 6 mg per unit.[26]
Coal power plants are the "the largest uncontrolled industrial source of mercury emissions in Canada".[27] According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (when coal power is used) the mercury released from powering an incandescent lamp for five years exceeds the total of (a) the mercury released by powering a comparably luminous CFL for the same period and (b) the mercury contained in the lamp.[28] It should be noted, however that the "EPA is implementing policies to reduce airborne mercury emissions. Under regulations issued in 2005, coal-fired power plants will need to reduce their emissions by 70 percent by 2018."[29]. Some manufacturers such as Philips and GE make very low-mercury content CFLs.[30] In 2007, Philips claimed its Master TL-D Alto range to have the lowest mercury content of any CFL on the market, at 2mg.[31] Safe disposal requires storing the bulbs unbroken until they can be processed. Consumers should seek advice from local authorities. Usually, one can either:
  • Return used CFLs to where they were purchased, so the store can recycle them correctly; or
  • Take used CFLs to a local recycling facility.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency publishes guidelines on how to clean up after CFL tube ('bulb') breakage [32] and recommends that, in the absence of local guideline, CFLs be double-bagged in plastic bags before disposal. The first step of processing CFLs involves crushing the bulbs in a machine that uses negative pressure ventilation and a mercury-absorbing filter or cold trap to contain and treat the contaminated gases. Many municipalities are purchasing such machines. The crushed glass and metal is stored in drums, ready for shipping to recycling factories. According to the Northwest Compact Fluorescent Lamp Recycling Project, because household users have the option of disposing of these products in the same way they dispose of other solid waste, "a large majority of household CFLs are going to municipal solid waste". They additionally note that an EPA report on mercury emissions from fluorescent tube lamp disposal indicates the percentage of total mercury released from the following disposal options: municipal waste landfill 3.2%, recycling 3%, municipal waste incineration 17.55% and hazardous waste disposal 0.2%.[33].
The west is always looking for pretexts of sueing. Looks like the above example is typical.
Nevertheless, we are surrounded by toxic chemicals and heavy metals. Do you know how much rich a source of heavy metals is your water supply or the polluted air of the metropolitan cities? Aren't you still drinking that pesticide laden cola?
Guess there is no end to poisons in our lives.
__________________
:::::::::: When freedom is outlawed, only outlaws will have freedom ::::::::::

Last edited by ..:: Free Radical ::..; 07-10-2007 at 03:01 PM.
..:: Free Radical ::.. is offline  
Old 07-10-2007, 03:00 PM   #13 (permalink)
krazyfrog
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

We have mercury in the physics lab of our college. We use it to perform experiments on it. I've handled it many times, even dipped my bare fingers in it to see how it feels (its a really funny sensation). However i haven't got as much as a nosebleed because of it. I'm perfectly fine (or i haven't been typing this).

CFLs are really good. They produce so much light but still consume so little power. Also they don't heat too much.Their light is also very soothing to the eyes.
 
Old 07-10-2007, 05:11 PM   #14 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Nav11aug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kharagpur for now
Posts: 362
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

@Free Radical.. gr8 wrk dude...


Quote:
The west is always looking for pretexts of sueing. Looks like the above example is typical.
exactly
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/NOLFxceptMe/
http://naveendageek.blogspot.com

Back after a long time. And well, EndSems screwed up as usual :)
Nav11aug is offline  
Old 07-10-2007, 07:07 PM   #15 (permalink)
Wire muncher!
 
infra_red_dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,164
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

Read the complete article (this consists the same incident iMav posted), the replies, the solutions etc.

http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/cfl.asp

Some interesting things in there.
__________________
"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good."

http://phoenix-ani.blogspot.com
infra_red_dude is offline  
Old 07-10-2007, 07:21 PM   #16 (permalink)
The Devil
 
blackpearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 0x02AE88C6FF
Posts: 983
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

In a few yrs CFLs will give way to LED bulbs.
blackpearl is offline  
Old 14-06-2009, 03:27 PM   #17 (permalink)
Right Off the Assembly Line
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

Hi

I used to own a CFL manufacturing plant and now manufacture CFL machinery (Angelo Brothers Company (India) Ltd.). I have pioneered CFL designs and machinery for the past 30 years to what they are today especially in India (hope, its not too much to brag about, and you can credit cheaper CFLs in India to me ).

India is the fastest growing CFL market (growing for the past seven years at 200% per annum)

India has no restrictions on mercury content in CFLs. However, USA and Europe have a 3mg requirement.

CFL plants have minimal wastage as opposed to the figures presented by you all. A typical CFL plant quotes a capacity of 6 million lamps pa. of which 175000-200000 is wastage (finished lamps). Note CFL companies usually produce 5.5 million pa per CFL line.

Mercury is reused through distillation (no mercury problem at our end) and so is ionized water (involved elsewhere). Glass portion is recycled in bottling plants and plastic portion is bought buy scrap dealers for reuse (only in India).

So basically from our (manufacturer) end there is no wastage.

Manufacturers in India (mainly) offer replacement services for CFLs that go bad within a year to two years. So once again no wastage.

Some manufacturers also go to the extent of buying back old CFLs at a minimal cost for recycling. However, in recent years its feasibility has declined. But once again any wastage can be easily be disposed off.

There are (were) a handful of environmentalists who are against CFLs but that is probably because they have nothing better to do. They hear mercury and they panic.

By the way did you know tube light use 15mg mercury. No issues raised there???

LED is in a very nascent stage. It will still take another 30 years to develop the way CFL is today. But it is the future to come.

Cheers

Pradeep Saxena
Pradeep Saxena is offline  
Old 20-06-2009, 01:13 AM   #18 (permalink)
Somebody stop me...
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Paris
Posts: 225
Default Re: Are CFLs that good ...

is CFL "Cleared FLight Level" !!
sorry but because of job habbits
__________________
Guess my password ....

www.techbuddy.in
swordfish is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
want to purchase Good EDGE enabled handset with good music quality.... mdp Mobiles and Tablets 13 29-09-2007 02:40 AM
is 2gb ram good xbonez Hardware Q&A 11 25-04-2007 09:55 PM
Need Good .Net[C# and ASP] e books i googled it but in vain nothing good and easy Sinja Internet & WWW 2 29-09-2006 01:20 AM

 
Latest Threads
- by gohan89
- by Who
- by icebags
- by Krow

Advertisement




All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2