 |
05-10-2007, 12:33 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
The Devil's Advocate
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Masti Ki Paathshaala
Posts: 7,019
|
Are CFLs that good ...
came across this peice of article following some links ...
Quote:
"According to an April 12 article in The Ellsworth American, Brandy Bridges had the misfortune of breaking a CFL during installation in her daughter's bedroom: It dropped and shattered on the carpeted floor. Aware that CFLs contain potentially hazardous substances, Bridges called her local Home Depot for advice. The store told her that the CFL contained mercury and that she should call the Poison Control hotline, which in turn directed her to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
The DEP sent a specialist to Bridges' house to test for mercury contamination. The specialist found mercury levels in the bedroom in excess of six times the state's "safe" level for mercury contamination of 300 billionths of a gram per cubic meter. The DEP specialist recommended that Bridges call an environmental cleanup firm, which reportedly gave her a "low-ball" estimate of US$2,000 to clean up the room. The room then was sealed off with plastic and Bridges began "gathering finances" to pay for the US$2,000 cleaning. Reportedly, her insurance company wouldn't cover the cleanup costs because mercury is a pollutant.
As each CFL contains five milligrams of mercury, at the Maine "safety" standard of 300 nanograms per cubic meter, it would take 16,667 cubic meters of soil to "safely" contain all the mercury in a single CFL. While CFL vendors and environmentalists tout the energy cost savings of CFLs, they conveniently omit the personal and societal costs of CFL disposal."
|
and isnt it true that they keep on saying save electricity and use CFL ... it shud ... save urself and dont use CFL
http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardwar.../1231202.shtml
__________________
"The problem that shows up with the three red lights on the console is a complex interaction with some very complex parts.” - Robbie Bach
http://beingmanan.com
twitter: manan | Last.FM: manan
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
05-10-2007, 12:45 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
AJJU
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: hYdErAbAd
Posts: 2,428
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
not so ...........
i do like CFL's there good source of light
but proper caring shud be taken
__________________
I love and Live to Design
|
|
|
05-10-2007, 09:22 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 763
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
In india we are hardly bothered about all this.
__________________
Change is Nature, the part that we can influence; and it starts when we decide.
Where you going?
With Luck forward.
|
|
|
05-10-2007, 09:24 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
The Devil's Advocate
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Masti Ki Paathshaala
Posts: 7,019
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
dude with kids around .... mercury is potentially very very dangerous
__________________
"The problem that shows up with the three red lights on the console is a complex interaction with some very complex parts.” - Robbie Bach
http://beingmanan.com
twitter: manan | Last.FM: manan
|
|
|
06-10-2007, 09:37 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Human Spambot
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lat 28.38°N , Longt 77.13°E
Posts: 2,431
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
CFLs are becoming famous as their prices are falling but they are hazardous as they contain mercury. Next in line are LED lamps which consume even less power and contain no mercury. But they are very expensive for now , rs. 500-600 for bulb which are equivalent to 40 watt old type bulbs
|
|
|
06-10-2007, 10:24 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
You'r Born Free
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ranchi
Posts: 425
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
Still to see Led bulb at my place
__________________
# Money, Beauty and Configration has no ends.
# Life is like game sometimes. Play it or loose it. But keep the spirit of game.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_Information_Act
|
|
|
06-10-2007, 10:26 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kharagpur for now
Posts: 362
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by iMav
dude with kids around .... mercury is potentially very very dangerous
|
hv a clinical thermometer at home? and more reachable than a light i guess
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/NOLFxceptMe/
http://naveendageek.blogspot.com
Back after a long time. And well, EndSems screwed up as usual :)
|
|
|
06-10-2007, 04:25 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
ToTheBeatOfUrHeart
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston,Newyork
Posts: 1,882
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
Very good info.
__________________
Mobo - P5N32-E SLI,P5N-E SLI|GFX - 2x8800GTS,8800GT|Processor - E6550,E6600|PSU - CM EP 600,HX620W|Physics - 2x8600GT
|
|
|
06-10-2007, 05:09 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Human Spambot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Aamchi Mumbai !!!
Posts: 4,227
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
Thanks didn't knew this.Anyways i don't use CFL.I don't mind on paying a few extra rupees than to pay thousand on hospital bill.Guys be careful.
__________________
ShutterTux - Photography, Linux & Life! : http://shuttertux.wordpress.com
|
|
|
06-10-2007, 05:09 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Human Spambot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Aamchi Mumbai !!!
Posts: 4,227
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
Thanks didn't knew this.Anyways i don't use CFL.I don't mind on paying a few extra rupees than to pay thousand on hospital bill.Guys be careful.
__________________
ShutterTux - Photography, Linux & Life! : http://shuttertux.wordpress.com
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 02:08 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Human Spambot
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lat 28.38°N , Longt 77.13°E
Posts: 2,431
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by int86
Still to see Led bulb at my place
|
You won't be able to see it for 2-3 more years as was the case with CFLs 6-7 years ago. They are too expensive
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 02:50 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
The Transcendental
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nutopia
Posts: 285
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
This looks like FUD.
Even tube lights contain the same amount (if not more) of mercury. Every fluorescent lamp or cathode ray tube (including your monitor) which contain the phosphor coating contains mercury. (i guess it helps in chelating the phosphor to the glass)
Any case, don't buy the cheap chinese unbranded ones.
I do agree however that there should be strict industrial norms.
From Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_fluorescent_lamp:

Mercury use of compact fluorescent lamp vs. incandescent lamp when powered by electricity generated from coal.
Code:
Mercury emissions
CFLs, like all fluorescent lamps (e.g., long tubular lamps common in offices and kitchens), contain small amounts of mercury[24][25] and it is a concern for landfills and waste incinerators where the mercury from lamps may be released and contribute to air and water pollution. In the USA, lighting manufacturer members of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) have made a voluntary commitment to cap the amount of mercury used in CFLs: Under the voluntary commitment, effective April 15, 2007, NEMA members will cap the total mercury content in CFLs of less than 25 watts at 5 milligrams (mg) per unit. The total mercury content of CFLs that use 25 to 40 watts of electricity will be capped at 6 mg per unit.[26]
Coal power plants are the "the largest uncontrolled industrial source of mercury emissions in Canada".[27] According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), (when coal power is used) the mercury released from powering an incandescent lamp for five years exceeds the total of (a) the mercury released by powering a comparably luminous CFL for the same period and (b) the mercury contained in the lamp.[28] It should be noted, however that the "EPA is implementing policies to reduce airborne mercury emissions. Under regulations issued in 2005, coal-fired power plants will need to reduce their emissions by 70 percent by 2018."[29].
Some manufacturers such as Philips and GE make very low-mercury content CFLs.[30] In 2007, Philips claimed its Master TL-D Alto range to have the lowest mercury content of any CFL on the market, at 2mg.[31]
Safe disposal requires storing the bulbs unbroken until they can be processed. Consumers should seek advice from local authorities. Usually, one can either: - Return used CFLs to where they were purchased, so the store can recycle them correctly; or
- Take used CFLs to a local recycling facility.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency publishes guidelines on how to clean up after CFL tube ('bulb') breakage [32] and recommends that, in the absence of local guideline, CFLs be double-bagged in plastic bags before disposal.
The first step of processing CFLs involves crushing the bulbs in a machine that uses negative pressure ventilation and a mercury-absorbing filter or cold trap to contain and treat the contaminated gases. Many municipalities are purchasing such machines. The crushed glass and metal is stored in drums, ready for shipping to recycling factories.
According to the Northwest Compact Fluorescent Lamp Recycling Project, because household users have the option of disposing of these products in the same way they dispose of other solid waste, "a large majority of household CFLs are going to municipal solid waste". They additionally note that an EPA report on mercury emissions from fluorescent tube lamp disposal indicates the percentage of total mercury released from the following disposal options: municipal waste landfill 3.2%, recycling 3%, municipal waste incineration 17.55% and hazardous waste disposal 0.2%. [33].
 The west is always looking for pretexts of sueing. Looks like the above example is typical.
Nevertheless, we are surrounded by toxic chemicals and heavy metals. Do you know how much rich a source of heavy metals is your water supply or the polluted air of the metropolitan cities? Aren't you still drinking that pesticide laden cola?
Guess there is no end to poisons in our lives.
__________________
:::::::::: When freedom is outlawed, only outlaws will have freedom ::::::::::
Last edited by ..:: Free Radical ::..; 07-10-2007 at 03:01 PM.
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 03:00 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
We have mercury in the physics lab of our college. We use it to perform experiments on it. I've handled it many times, even dipped my bare fingers in it to see how it feels (its a really funny sensation). However i haven't got as much as a nosebleed because of it. I'm perfectly fine (or i haven't been typing this).
CFLs are really good. They produce so much light but still consume so little power. Also they don't heat too much.Their light is also very soothing to the eyes.
|
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 05:11 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Kharagpur for now
Posts: 362
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
@Free Radical.. gr8 wrk dude...
Quote:
|
The west is always looking for pretexts of sueing. Looks like the above example is typical.
|
exactly
__________________
http://www.last.fm/user/NOLFxceptMe/
http://naveendageek.blogspot.com
Back after a long time. And well, EndSems screwed up as usual :)
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 07:07 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Wire muncher!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,164
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
Read the complete article (this consists the same incident iMav posted), the replies, the solutions etc.
http://www.snopes.com/medical/toxins/cfl.asp
Some interesting things in there.
__________________
"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good."
http://phoenix-ani.blogspot.com
|
|
|
07-10-2007, 07:21 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
The Devil
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 0x02AE88C6FF
Posts: 983
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
In a few yrs CFLs will give way to LED bulbs.
|
|
|
14-06-2009, 03:27 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
Hi
I used to own a CFL manufacturing plant and now manufacture CFL machinery (Angelo Brothers Company (India) Ltd.). I have pioneered CFL designs and machinery for the past 30 years to what they are today especially in India (hope, its not too much to brag about, and you can credit cheaper CFLs in India to me  ).
India is the fastest growing CFL market (growing for the past seven years at 200% per annum)
India has no restrictions on mercury content in CFLs. However, USA and Europe have a 3mg requirement.
CFL plants have minimal wastage as opposed to the figures presented by you all. A typical CFL plant quotes a capacity of 6 million lamps pa. of which 175000-200000 is wastage (finished lamps). Note CFL companies usually produce 5.5 million pa per CFL line.
Mercury is reused through distillation (no mercury problem at our end) and so is ionized water (involved elsewhere). Glass portion is recycled in bottling plants and plastic portion is bought buy scrap dealers for reuse (only in India).
So basically from our (manufacturer) end there is no wastage.
Manufacturers in India (mainly) offer replacement services for CFLs that go bad within a year to two years. So once again no wastage.
Some manufacturers also go to the extent of buying back old CFLs at a minimal cost for recycling. However, in recent years its feasibility has declined. But once again any wastage can be easily be disposed off.
There are (were) a handful of environmentalists who are against CFLs but that is probably because they have nothing better to do.  They hear mercury and they panic.
By the way did you know tube light use 15mg mercury. No issues raised there???
LED is in a very nascent stage. It will still take another 30 years to develop the way CFL is today. But it is the future to come.
Cheers
Pradeep Saxena
|
|
|
20-06-2009, 01:13 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Somebody stop me...
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Paris
Posts: 225
|
Re: Are CFLs that good ...
is CFL "Cleared FLight Level" !! 
sorry but because of job habbits
__________________
Guess my password ....
www.techbuddy.in
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|