Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > Portables, Peripherals and Electronics > QnA (read only)
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

QnA (read only) Mods please help transfer the contents of this forum to proper sections. :)


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 22-05-2007, 03:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
Proud Mac Pro Owner
 
nepcker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 345
Default ACDSee


ACDSee 1.6 for Mac

"ACDSee is a high speed, full-featured image viewer that displays digital images in high resolution." Ha! Ha! Ha!

There are a few people on this forum (actually, just one person) who think that Apple's iPhoto software is bad, and ACDSee is way, way better. I didn't comment on that because I hadn't used ACDSee before, but after having used it, I can certainly say that iPhoto is a billion times better than ACDSee. Almost featureless and slower than a snail. I trashed it after 30 minutes of testing.



Click on the image to enlarge

Here goes the review:

First impressions
If you ask me why I like MS Office for Mac, then I'd say that it acts like a Mac software, not a Windows software. And this ACDSee seems to be the Frankenstein crossover between Mac OS X, Mac Classic, and a PC application. It greets you with the Browser window, in which the volume hierarchy is shown on the right and on the left, the contents of the currently selected folder are presented in little 'slides' that eat up lots of border space. I won't even go into the tiny 24x24 buttons that make up the toolbar, which seem to be drawn using MS Paint.

The Browse mode has three modes of showing the images: the first is the Slides you start up with; the second is Borderless, which is in essence the same as slides except for the actual border around each image, and does nothing to help get more out of the screen real-estate; the third mode, Classic, reminds me of some very, very old applications, the PC kind, with a grey beveled outline surrounding every item and its name. It looks horrid when placed on the white background the application uses.

Anti-aliasing and Thumbnails
The thumbnails it shows in that Browse mode are badly scaled often, having that pixilated look, that there is no anti-aliasing used, and that it cannot display the icons of items in more than 32x32.

I managed to turn that horrid border to a minimum and also identified the compression level for the thumbnails. I turned it all the way up to None and reloaded the folder. Even after that, the thumbnails were pretty much the same, although a little better, they were still not on par with the anti-aliased thumbnails that other OS X image viewers have got me used to.

Let's move past that and go into the actual image viewing.

Image viewing
The view mode presents one big window in which to view the images one at a time. By default, the program is set up to show the image at its full size, regardless of how big the window is. This is easily remedied and it also features a Full Screen mode, which is the better choice. There is also the option to resize the window to fit the image, a mind-boggling feature whose use I have yet to grasp. If you have it enabled and open up a series of images of all different sizes, the window will resize vertically and horizontally with every image creating a most pleasant sensation of vertigo.

If you choose to rotate or flip the image, it will ask you whether you want to save the changes when you move on to the next image. Saving the image is done without you setting any options whatsoever, and JPEG files get compressed at a ratio that is beyond your control. What is more interesting is that if you flip a TIFF image for example, it will ask you whether you want to save the changes but it will not actually save anything.

Other View Modes
The Details view is useful when you have a huge number of images in one place and need detailed information about each of them without actually having to know what they look like. The Wide Thumbnail view lists each item on a line, with the name and other information on the right. This is perfect for leaving a great big area that is never used and making those little slide huge without actually showing a bigger thumbnail. And then there's the Small Icons view, which basically shows the contents of the Folder or drive in a Windows manner. If you want an instant reminder of what Windows Explorer looks like and how it arranges those icons, look no further.

The Good

The application does have a nice icon, with the ACDSee eye logo and two pictures that appear to be of the same thing: a butterfly on a yellow flower.

The Bad
So much to choose from I don't even know where to begin. Leaving aside all the minor issues, the program has big problems with resizing images. Any image displayed at a size smaller than the normal one risks getting pixelated and showing artifacts. Such problems in an image viewing application are unacceptable. It is also super-slow. And have they never heard of anti-aliasing?

The Truth
iPhoto is a much better and much faster alternative. For the advanced folks (like me), Aperture is the tool needed. If you want to view images by browsing your file system, then I recommend GraphicConverter -- it's the best, IMHO. For Windows users, even the free IrfanView does a better job.
__________________
Microsoft Certified Professional Mac Addict
nepcker is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 22-05-2007, 05:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
HELP AND SUPPORT
 
rakeshishere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,603
Default Re: ACDSee

The Thread Title was only "ACDSee" and i clicked it find some some fanboyism when i saw "ACDSee 1.6 for Mac"

B/w ACDSee is really Good softie for image editing and other functions disregarding the fact that it supports Mac OS

Edit:I didnt Read:
Quote:
The Truth
iPhoto is a much better and much faster alternative. For the advanced folks (like me), Aperture is the tool needed. If you want to view images by browsing your file system, then I recommend GraphicConverter -- it's the best, IMHO. For Windows users, even the free IrfanView does a better job.
rakeshishere is offline  
Old 22-05-2007, 07:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
You gave been GXified
 
gxsaurav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,633
Default Re: ACDSee

bawahwahwahwahwahwah

:ROFL" Nepcker, how blind & ignorent you can get with your Posts

Guys, all of the forum members, just go to this page of Version tracker & check when was the last version of ACDSee 1.6.5 was relesed for Mac OS X. 2001-11-30

I mean, this is just insanely stupid nepcker, I know you are a fanboy of Apple products but to this extent of comparing a Product of 2001 with a product of 2006 (iPhoto) is well......stupid.

Well since you have stared a thread about ACDSee, I ask the forum members, should I post a review of ACDSee 9 of 2007 with iPhoto of 2006

Just to add, I would like to compare the costs of some products, assuming we are buying it.

ACDSee 9 Photo Manager for Windows Vista = $40. Comes with it's own digital image editing features.
ACDSee Pro Photo Manager = $130. Seriously good alternative to Adobe Lightroom on Windows. Made for RAW image editing
Apple aperture = $300
Windows Photo Gallery = Free with Windows Vista.
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom = $300. But provides far more features then Aperture for Mac.
XNView & Irfan view = Free
__________________
about.me/gxsaurav

Last edited by gxsaurav; 22-05-2007 at 07:35 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
gxsaurav is offline  
Old 22-05-2007, 09:03 PM   #4 (permalink)
Proud Mac Pro Owner
 
nepcker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 345
Default Re: ACDSee

So, which is the latest version of ACDSee for Mac OS X? I just tried what was the latest version of ACDSee for Mac OS X. I didn't know its release dates, etc.

ACDSee 1.6.9 was the one that turned up in a Google search. (A search for "ACDSee Mac OS X" gives me the link to ACDSee 1.6)
__________________
Microsoft Certified Professional Mac Addict
nepcker is offline  
Old 22-05-2007, 09:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
You gave been GXified
 
gxsaurav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,633
Default Re: ACDSee

None, that is the last version of ACDSee for Mac. I guess ACDSee didn't see enough potential customars on Mac platform

But seriously....your comparision of ACDSee of 2001 with iPhoto of 2006 still makes me laugh. Dude if you wanted to compare download the 21 day trial version from ACDSee website & run it on Vista. You have Vista with you so why not compare your self & see how it kicks iPhoto.

Do not compare Aperture. A home user will never buy a $300 Software for image management. I just got graphics converter & I m using it. The browser is what I wanted, folder based nevigation finally, still trying to solve some quirks like the ability to hide thumb.db file in it.
__________________
about.me/gxsaurav
gxsaurav is offline  
Old 22-05-2007, 09:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
blackleopard92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 310
Default Re: ACDSee

ROFL!!!
this is insane.. man! ROFL!

u should get this thread deleted before anyone else read it too. lol
or maybe, not.
blackleopard92 is offline  
Old 23-05-2007, 12:28 AM   #7 (permalink)
You gave been GXified
 
gxsaurav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,633
Default Re: ACDSee

graphics convertar proves to be real slow. I a, back to Shoebox, damn I miss my left side nevigation panel.

Verdict - MacOS X doesn't have a proper image management tool for home usage which lets you work the way you want.
__________________
about.me/gxsaurav
gxsaurav is offline  
Old 23-05-2007, 01:17 AM   #8 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
aryayush's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Noida
Posts: 5,601
Default Re: ACDSee

People make mistakes. No big deal. You should accept them and get over it.

@nepcker, you really should have checked out the release date, mate. I guess I know that a software's release date is not the first thing you look at when you go to download it, but seeing the interface and features should have made you realise that something must be wrong. You goofed up.

(BTW, I also see how it might've made sense. You see, when gx_saurav says something is good, it means that the thing is bad. And this kind of interface is exactly the sort of thing that gx_saurav loves.)

Thread reported.
__________________
Miss me already? See you on Penned Thoughts [http://aayush.me] then. Adios! :)
aryayush is offline  
Old 23-05-2007, 01:34 AM   #9 (permalink)
You gave been GXified
 
gxsaurav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,633
Default Re: ACDSee

Quote:
(BTW, I also see how it might've made sense. You see, when gx_saurav says something is good, it means that the thing is bad. And this kind of interface is exactly the sort of thing that gx_saurav loves.)
Which automatically concludes that when you say Apple or Mac is good or there "Many Window" plates based UI is good, you are actully trying to convice yourself that "i made a good choice so I should make everyone buy it paying damn high prices so that I m not the only one suffering from the pain of paying high prices"

Oh & by the way, this is how a real image management App called ACDSee looks on Windows. Use it the way you want to...folder based, catagory based, virtual folder based, calender based....the choice is yours.



P.S. - Did you again ran out of proper & valid things to say.
__________________
about.me/gxsaurav
gxsaurav is offline  
Old 23-05-2007, 05:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
Proud Mac Pro Owner
 
nepcker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 345
Default Re: ACDSee

I am really, really, really sorry for this. From next time, I'll check the release date of any software I review.

It must be that ACDSee got really bad feedback from the Mac users, so they discontinued it.

@gx_saurav:
Now that you've got GraphicConverter, why don't you add it to your list of softwares for image whatever? I've been using it for years and is better than Photoshop Elements.

And Aperture is better that Lightroom, btw.
__________________
Microsoft Certified Professional Mac Addict
nepcker is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ACDSee 7 is out gxsaurav QnA (read only) 8 05-10-2004 03:15 PM

 
Latest Threads
- by Tenida
- by Charan
- by abhidev

Advertisement




All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2