Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > Portables, Peripherals and Electronics > QnA (read only)
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

QnA (read only) Mods please help transfer the contents of this forum to proper sections. :)


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19-05-2007, 08:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Broken In
 
gaurav21r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: High, High above, over that Blue Sky
Posts: 100
Question NTFS vs FAT


Hey ppl my comp repair guy recently installed a new Hard Disk... The Seagate Baracuda 80GB....is it a good one?

I found that 2 partitions were created like always, but this time C: is 20 GB FAT32 while D: is 55 GB NTFS...

Is it okay for 2 partitions to have different file systems?

Plus which is better and suitable for which type of work b/w FAT32 and NTFS



__________________
do i have to write something here?????
gaurav21r is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 19-05-2007, 08:24 PM   #2 (permalink)
gooby pls
 
Third Eye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not very far from you
Posts: 4,293
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

Quote:
Originally Posted by gaurav21r
Hey ppl my comp repair guy recently installed a new Hard Disk... The Seagate Baracuda 80GB....is it a good one?


Yes

Quote:
Is it okay for 2 partitions to have different file systems?
Yeah

Quote:
Plus which is better and suitable for which type of work b/w FAT32 and NTFS


NTFS is better

See why -> http://www.ntfs.com/ntfs_vs_fat.htm

__________________
:|
Third Eye is online now  
Old 19-05-2007, 08:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
1337 |)00|) \m/
 
kaustav_geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cyber Space
Posts: 472
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

This might help you decide..
__________________
My Blog : www.vatsuak.blogspot.com
My DA page : www.burningsilver.deviantart.com

OK..ok..... Ads are bad.. ;)
kaustav_geek is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 08:34 PM   #4 (permalink)
Alpha Geek
 
eagle_y2j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Himalayas
Posts: 719
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

but for me FAT32 is gud option as it is having default read and write support from Linux OS
__________________
Registered LINUX USER #438929
eagle_y2j is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 08:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Alpha Geek
 
sachin_kothari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pune
Posts: 569
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle_y2j
but for me FAT32 is gud option as it is having default read and write support from Linux OS
ntfs can also be read and written from linux. but yes, u have to configure it (atleast in Debian).
sachin_kothari is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 08:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
1337 |)00|) \m/
 
kaustav_geek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cyber Space
Posts: 472
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

Quote:
but for me FAT32 is gud option as it is having default read and write support from Linux OS
Yes, thats very true. But I'd recommend FAT32 for one more reason... In case something goes wrong with your WIN installation, and you need to backup data using some Boot disk, Sometimes, NTFS isn't supported and you end up getting screwed...
__________________
My Blog : www.vatsuak.blogspot.com
My DA page : www.burningsilver.deviantart.com

OK..ok..... Ads are bad.. ;)
kaustav_geek is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 08:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
Alpha Geek
 
eagle_y2j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Himalayas
Posts: 719
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

Quote:
Originally Posted by sachin_kothari
ntfs can also be read and written from linux. but yes, u have to configure it (atleast in Debian).
i prefer FAT32 for default read and write support ....its less messy
__________________
Registered LINUX USER #438929
eagle_y2j is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 08:48 PM   #8 (permalink)
left this forum longback
 
praka123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

wait for sometime more for the work @ http://linux-ntfs.org for their final software.
afaik ntfs-3g is a beta software ofcourse based on the work of http://linux-ntfs.org project ppl.
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
praka123 is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 08:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
TheSaint
 
NucleusKore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Antigua
Posts: 3,447
Talking Re: NTFS vs FAT

Quote:
Originally Posted by eagle_y2j
but for me FAT32 is gud option as it is having default read and write support from Linux OS
Instead let only C be FAT32, make other drives ext3, and use ext2ifs to read/write the ext3 partition from windows, that's what I do
__________________
http://www.neville.in
http://www.linuxrocks.in
"The Future Is Open"
NucleusKore is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 08:56 PM   #10 (permalink)
Alpha Geek
 
eagle_y2j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Himalayas
Posts: 719
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

Quote:
Originally Posted by NucleusKore
Instead let only C be FAT32, make other drives ext3, and use ext2ifs to read/write the ext3 partition from windows, that's what I do
but is this matters for linux users FAT32 and ext2 (we can read write both )
__________________
Registered LINUX USER #438929
eagle_y2j is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 08:57 PM   #11 (permalink)
left this forum longback
 
praka123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

I have all my datas in ext3 file system partitions.
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
praka123 is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 10:49 PM   #12 (permalink)
God of Mistakes...
 
Garbage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pune, Maharashtra
Posts: 1,923
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

hey guyz what u r talking abt ? Gaurav21r never asked for Linux with FAT.

@ gaurav21r

It is always better to have NTFS partitions than FAT / FAT32 partitions.

If u have any FAT32 partition then u can convert it to NTFS using windows command "convert"

Go to command prompt and type "convert /?" (without quotes)
__________________
Registered Linux User #468778
----------------------------------
http://twitter.com/_Garbage_
Garbage is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 10:54 PM   #13 (permalink)
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
 
kalpik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,432
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

Quote:
Originally Posted by praka123
wait for sometime more for the work @ http://linux-ntfs.org for their final software.
afaik ntfs-3g is a beta software ofcourse based on the work of http://linux-ntfs.org project ppl.
NTFS-3G is a stable software.. Its out of beta. http://www.ntfs-3g.org/
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
kalpik is offline  
Old 19-05-2007, 10:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
18 Till I Die............
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: India, Mumbai, Marine Lines
Posts: 5,792
Default Re: NTFS vs FAT

locked. already many threads on this topic have been put up. Nothing new I see here.
mehulved is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ntfs & fat 32 ssk_the_gr8 QnA (read only) 6 17-12-2005 03:12 PM
NTFS or FAT 32?! zerohourkill QnA (read only) 3 05-07-2005 10:01 AM
NTFS in XP?? hearthacker Software Q&A 1 31-05-2005 04:41 PM
ntfs reader not detecting my ntfs drive help expertno.1 QnA (read only) 3 24-05-2005 09:19 PM
Unable to mount all ntfs drives in fedora3.mount one ntfs, neerajvohra Open Source 1 06-02-2005 03:56 PM

 
Latest Threads
- by Tenida
- by Charan
- by abhidev

Advertisement




All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2