19-05-2007, 08:12 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: High, High above, over that Blue Sky
Posts: 100
|
NTFS vs FAT
Hey ppl my comp repair guy recently installed a new Hard Disk... The Seagate Baracuda 80GB....is it a good one?
I found that 2 partitions were created like always, but this time C: is 20 GB FAT32 while D: is 55 GB NTFS...
Is it okay for 2 partitions to have different file systems?
Plus which is better and suitable for which type of work b/w FAT32 and NTFS
__________________
do i have to write something here?????
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:24 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
gooby pls
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not very far from you
Posts: 4,293
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gaurav21r
Hey ppl my comp repair guy recently installed a new Hard Disk... The Seagate Baracuda 80GB....is it a good one?
|
Yes
Quote:
|
Is it okay for 2 partitions to have different file systems?
|
Yeah
Quote:
|
Plus which is better and suitable for which type of work b/w FAT32 and NTFS
|
NTFS is better
See why -> http://www.ntfs.com/ntfs_vs_fat.htm
__________________
:|
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:27 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
1337 |)00|) \m/
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cyber Space
Posts: 472
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
This might help you decide..
__________________
My Blog : www.vatsuak.blogspot.com
My DA page : www.burningsilver.deviantart.com
OK..ok..... Ads are bad.. ;)
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:34 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Himalayas
Posts: 719
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
but for me FAT32 is gud option as it is having default read and write support from Linux OS
__________________
Registered LINUX USER #438929
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:37 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pune
Posts: 569
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by eagle_y2j
but for me FAT32 is gud option as it is having default read and write support from Linux OS
|
ntfs can also be read and written from linux. but yes, u have to configure it (atleast in Debian).
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:42 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
1337 |)00|) \m/
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cyber Space
Posts: 472
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
Quote:
|
but for me FAT32 is gud option as it is having default read and write support from Linux OS
|
Yes, thats very true. But I'd recommend FAT32 for one more reason... In case something goes wrong with your WIN installation, and you need to backup data using some Boot disk, Sometimes, NTFS isn't supported and you end up getting screwed...
__________________
My Blog : www.vatsuak.blogspot.com
My DA page : www.burningsilver.deviantart.com
OK..ok..... Ads are bad.. ;)
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:44 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Himalayas
Posts: 719
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sachin_kothari
ntfs can also be read and written from linux. but yes, u have to configure it (atleast in Debian).
|
i prefer FAT32 for default read and write support ....its less messy
__________________
Registered LINUX USER #438929
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:48 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
left this forum longback
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
wait for sometime more for the work @ http://linux-ntfs.org for their final software.
afaik ntfs-3g is a beta software ofcourse based on the work of http://linux-ntfs.org project ppl.
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:53 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
TheSaint
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Antigua
Posts: 3,447
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by eagle_y2j
but for me FAT32 is gud option as it is having default read and write support from Linux OS
|
Instead let only C be FAT32, make other drives ext3, and use ext2ifs to read/write the ext3 partition from windows, that's what I do
__________________
http://www.neville.in
http://www.linuxrocks.in
"The Future Is Open"
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:56 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Himalayas
Posts: 719
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NucleusKore
Instead let only C be FAT32, make other drives ext3, and use ext2ifs to read/write the ext3 partition from windows, that's what I do 
|
but is this matters for linux users FAT32 and ext2 (we can read write both )
__________________
Registered LINUX USER #438929
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 08:57 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
left this forum longback
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
I have all my datas in ext3 file system partitions.
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 10:49 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
God of Mistakes...
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pune, Maharashtra
Posts: 1,923
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
hey guyz what u r talking abt ? Gaurav21r never asked for Linux with FAT.
@ gaurav21r
It is always better to have NTFS partitions than FAT / FAT32 partitions.
If u have any FAT32 partition then u can convert it to NTFS using windows command "convert"
Go to command prompt and type "convert /?" (without quotes)
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 10:54 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,432
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by praka123
|
NTFS-3G is a stable software.. Its out of beta. http://www.ntfs-3g.org/
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
19-05-2007, 10:56 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
18 Till I Die............
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: India, Mumbai, Marine Lines
Posts: 5,792
|
Re: NTFS vs FAT
locked. already many threads on this topic have been put up. Nothing new I see here.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|