Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > Portables, Peripherals and Electronics > QnA (read only)
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

QnA (read only) Mods please help transfer the contents of this forum to proper sections. :)


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-11-2006, 11:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gujarat National Law University,Gandhinagar
Posts: 205
Default Core Solo Vs. Core Duo


whats the basic diff. btw core solo and core duo processor.
Which one is better..
and what is the diff. btw core duo & core duo2...
thadhanihemant is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 11-11-2006, 12:08 AM   #2 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
Kiran.dks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 2,501
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

Core Duo is better than Core Solo. Core Duo allows you to perform simultaneous 'load' (CPU is consumed) operations without slowing down the system. Core Solo tends to slow down under this situation.
__________________
Kiran Kumar R
Kiran.dks is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 12:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
Wise Old Owl
 
piyush gupta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: never land
Posts: 1,284
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

can anyone explain basic tech. diff between both processors
piyush gupta is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 01:02 AM   #4 (permalink)
Laptoping
 
Sourabh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 2,211
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

It is in the name, core duo = two processing cores in the same die, so it acts like 2 processors. It should not be confused with hyper threading.

Core solo is single core variant of the same.

Core solo is well nothing great. Except for their ULV or LV processors, I wouldn't even bother about them. It wouldn't be wrong in saying they made it to rip off extra premiums. Celeron and older Pentium M were good enough for value and budget notebooks.
__________________
You could think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to stop thinking.
Sourabh is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 09:04 AM   #5 (permalink)
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
 
kalpik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,432
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

Id like to add here that core solo is just a core duo processor with one of the cores disabled. It helps intel because if a core duo processor fails quality checks because of defects in one of the core, they just disable the defective core and sell it as core solo.
kalpik is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 11:07 AM   #6 (permalink)
De@d
 
outlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: kerala
Posts: 355
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

thats wicked
__________________
Man's greatest living fear - When you die, they will find your porn"

Most people are only alive because it is illegal to
shoot them.
outlaw is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 12:19 PM   #7 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
tuxfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 2,653
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalpik
Id like to add here that core solo is just a core duo processor with one of the cores disabled. It helps intel because if a core duo processor fails quality checks because of defects in one of the core, they just disable the defective core and sell it as core solo.
You mean to say that if one of the cores in my Core DUO goes bad, will my machine still function on the other one??
__________________
:: Free hosting and free domain names available in special cases. Conditions apply ::
tuxfan is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 12:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
Alpha Geek
 
jz2linkinpark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rorikstead
Posts: 560
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

is it possible for a processor with core2duo written on the die be a core solo?
cuz my proccy has core2duo written on it but only performs as a one core processor...
@sourabh: yes i posted before and the problem was resolved, i just wanted to see other peoples ideas on why it might have occurred
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(")signature to help him gain world domination.

Last edited by jz2linkinpark; 11-11-2006 at 01:38 PM.
jz2linkinpark is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 01:03 PM   #9 (permalink)
Laptoping
 
Sourabh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 2,211
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

^^jz2: It is not possible. If I am not mistaken you have posted about it more than once on the forum before. There might be some software/driver issues. I hope you are not using XP Home with no service packs.
__________________
You could think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to stop thinking.
Sourabh is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 03:05 PM   #10 (permalink)
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
 
kalpik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,432
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuxfan
You mean to say that if one of the cores in my Core DUO goes bad, will my machine still function on the other one??
I dunno about that
The disabling of the core is done by intel. Im sure you cannot do it at home
kalpik is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 04:48 PM   #11 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
kumarmohit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Riding an Oliphaunt
Posts: 2,173
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

LOL Imagine if some one finds a way to enable the disabled core. (i know its virtually impossible)
__________________
The real and only freedom is Public Domain. Everything else in unfree! Even those who claim to be the self styled evangelists of freedom are not free because freedom cannot be forced by any means!
kumarmohit is offline  
Old 11-11-2006, 11:58 PM   #12 (permalink)
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
 
kalpik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,432
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

^^ No use too.. Because the other core almost always will have some problem.
kalpik is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 02:02 AM   #13 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gujarat National Law University,Gandhinagar
Posts: 205
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

thanks alot guys for clearing my doubt...
thadhanihemant is offline  
Old 12-11-2006, 08:17 AM   #14 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
Kiran.dks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pune, India
Posts: 2,501
Default Re: Core Solo Vs. Core Duo

Quote:
Originally Posted by tuxfan
You mean to say that if one of the cores in my Core DUO goes bad, will my machine still function on the other one??
No dude. It's not possible. Intel does it by electronic way. It is easy for them to disable one Core, no need of a new production line of CPUs that physically only have one core. Intel was using this strategy earlier too in their 486 CPU's.
__________________
Kiran Kumar R
Kiran.dks is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
Latest Threads
- by topgear
- by abhidev
- by clmlbx
- by Sarath

Advertisement




All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2