Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > Portables, Peripherals and Electronics > QnA (read only)
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

QnA (read only) Mods please help transfer the contents of this forum to proper sections. :)


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 19-08-2005, 06:57 PM   #1 (permalink)
Right Off the Assembly Line
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
Default whichone to choose ddr or ddr2


hey,
just tell me, where to go ? my 2 ways are
1) 2 gb of ddr 400 mhz
2)1 gb of ddr2 533 mhz
as i already said my mode of transport is multimedia work like (maya,combustion,photoshop,flash).just help me ...........
vraja4u is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 19-08-2005, 07:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Wise Old Owl
 
siriusb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chennai, India, Asia, the Earth, the Solar system, the Milky Way, the Local group, this Universe.
Posts: 1,171
Default

Take the ddr400 2GB option. DDR2 has a bit of higher speed but is compensated by its higher latencies. And 2GB shud help u out in grafx.
__________________
http://myxp.blogspot.com
-----------------------
Winchester 3200+ @2,500MHz
LeadTek 7900GT VOLT MODDED @ 680 core, 1800 mem
2x1GB Transcend DDR400 @ DDR454 2.5,3,3,5,1T
siriusb is offline  
Old 19-08-2005, 10:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 247
Default

I agree.
geekysage is offline  
Old 19-08-2005, 11:34 PM   #4 (permalink)
Alpha Geek
 
sidewinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Bengal
Posts: 625
Default

i agree too
__________________
Bombina rocks
sidewinder is offline  
Old 19-08-2005, 11:49 PM   #5 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
hcp006sl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 221
Default

Good suggestion.
If you are not satisfied with DDR, try RD. If your mainboard supports.
__________________
Orkut members are invited to join:
http://www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=28705185
hcp006sl is offline  
Old 20-08-2005, 12:22 AM   #6 (permalink)
The Hardware Labs
 
mohit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Raipur, India.
Posts: 1,546
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hcp006sl
Good suggestion.
If you are not satisfied with DDR, try RD. If your mainboard supports.
i dont suggest going for RD RAM .. it is hardly available in India and the price is just too steep. Go for DDR 400 Mhz 2 gb , it will be more than sufficient for graphics intensive work.
mohit is offline  
Old 20-08-2005, 06:00 PM   #7 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: kolkata
Posts: 255
Default

Uhmm , well , yeah !
__________________
AMD64 2800+ 1GB ECC DDR 400 ,MSI K8T800 Asus Geforce FX 5200 128 MB, 120 GB Barracuda,16X DVD RW,Samsung 16x DVD,Samsung Wireless ,Creative AUDIGY2 ZS 7.1 with Creative Inspire 7.1/1800+AXP 512MB ECC DDR400 .40GB BLACK
indro is offline  
Old 20-08-2005, 06:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
Commander in Chief
 
QwertyManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,658
Default

I too agree with siriusb...
__________________
Harsh J
www.harshj.com
QwertyManiac is offline  
Old 20-08-2005, 07:42 PM   #9 (permalink)
Resident Weapons Expert
 
zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alpha Centauri
Posts: 203
Default

These chips are the next generation of DDR SDRAM memory. They are mounted on 240-pin DIMM modules, can operate at higher bus speeds and have a capacity to hold 256 Mb to 2 GB of memory. DDR2 has twice the latency of DDR but delivers data at twice the speed of DDR, theoretically performing at the same level. But it'll cost lot more. I think its always better to go for more amount of marginally slower memory rather than faster but less memory. For graphic intensive applications my vote goes to 2GB DDR @ 400MHz.
__________________
Stalk, Strike, Survive.
zombie is offline  
Old 20-08-2005, 07:48 PM   #10 (permalink)
Broken In
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 145
Default

ya definately go DDR400 ram
__________________
www.guessthelogo.blogspot.com
harshagarwal is offline  
Old 20-08-2005, 07:54 PM   #11 (permalink)
Resident Weapons Expert
 
zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alpha Centauri
Posts: 203
Default

Moreover DDR2 compatible mobo will be quiet a bit costlier than a DDR compatible mobo. Add to this the higher cost of DDR2 and it will escalate the overall cost of your rig.
__________________
Stalk, Strike, Survive.
zombie is offline  
Old 20-08-2005, 08:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
Alpha Geek
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hcp006sl
Good suggestion.
If you are not satisfied with DDR, try RD. If your mainboard supports.
RD = dead as a dodo!
__________________
[ THIS SPACE HAS BEEN RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE IN CASE I WANT TO BOAST ABOUT MY PC'S, HOUSE, CAR, GIRLFRIENDS OR OTHER STUFF THAT I KNOW YOU DON'T REALLY CARE ABOUT ]
Keith Sebastian is offline  
Old 20-08-2005, 09:02 PM   #13 (permalink)
Resident Weapons Expert
 
zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alpha Centauri
Posts: 203
Default

Cant even get a module in the neighborhood for RD. My buddy was stuck with 2X256MB RDRAM module. One went BOOM, so instead of wasting time and money for RDRAM, he got a new AMD mobo/CPU combo. So much for as good as dead RDRAM. I think he's not alone in this boat.
__________________
Stalk, Strike, Survive.
zombie is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
Latest Threads
- by abhidev
- by Sujeet
- by Sarath
- by Krow

Advertisement




All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2