08-09-2004, 03:23 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 21
|
LONGHORN - can u believe this?
"Microsoft is expected to recommend that the "average" Longhorn PC feature a dual-core CPU running at 4 to 6GHz; a minimum of 2 gigs of RAM; up to a terabyte of storage; a 1 Gbit, built-in, Ethernet-wired port and an 802.11g wireless link; and a graphics processor that runs three times faster than those on the market today. "
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/artic...1581842,00.asp
__________________
Neerav
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
08-09-2004, 03:37 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chennai
Posts: 113
|
I think when they manage to release Longhorn,this config will be normal.
__________________
As you enter this life,I pray you depart
With a wrinkled face,And a brand new heart.
-- U2\'s Love and Peace or Else (HTDAAB)
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 03:46 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: mumbai
Posts: 522
|
ya as the expected date of launching is end 2005 early 2006 thats what gonna be the normal conhiguration for the pcs
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 04:13 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
The Photoshop Guy
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: On Your monitor!
Posts: 562
|
BTW they gonna give all this for free with longhorn :roll:
..:: peace ::..
Jeba
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 08:04 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Somewhere In my room....
Posts: 143
|
I seriously Doubt thats gonna be the final requirement...
Forget it...
6Ghz Processors will be High End in Sept 2005.
2 Gb Ram Again will be present only in Mid Range PCs.
1 TB of storage.. Hmm... I have 200 Gigs.. 800 More to go...
No,again 1 TB is doubtful.
1Gbit Lan is OK.
3 times Faster Graphics Core... Thats pretty much possible considering the cut throat competition between Nvidia and ATI....
But what i dont get is, Is avlon presentation going to be really that much better than MAC OS X's Quartz Extreme (MAC OS X Presentation Engine) , which is light years ahead of the competition....
Also what concerns me is the amount of overhead WinFS is going to put on the system. A DB Based Filesystem will not be very forgiving on ur system.
__________________
\"Hating people is like burning down your own house to get rid of a rat\" - Harry Emerson Fosdick
\"A Pessimist is one who makes difficulties of his oppertunities; an optimist is one who makes oppertunities of his difficulties\" - Reginald B. Mansell
oh yeah.. my Fav Quote
\"Sometimes a winner is just a dreamer who never gave up.\"
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 08:05 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: May 2004
Location: India
Posts: 930
|
Do you guys remember the "Is windows a virus" joke?
Mircosoft really sucks!!!
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 10:07 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Locating....Locating....Access Denied!
Posts: 320
|
The configuration is great.
__________________
Simple things are to simple too understand.
|
|
|
16-09-2004, 11:33 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
King of my own Castle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Humor and wit.
Posts: 1,249
|
It's definate that Longhorn is going to be damn heavy on the system resources ; but ...but but...by todays system configuration not 2005's ( end ) or 2006...i think its going to be damn easy for system then to handle Longhorn...Coz i basically think the OS should not hog more than 20 to 30 % of the system recourses and atleat 70 % of system recourses should be kept free to play playable games and other Heavy appliances....
WinFs may be heavy for now ....but its gonna be so easy on the system then and moreever i think its miles ahead to ntfs...
WinFs is to Ntfs what Ntfs is to Fat....
About Mac coming out with another Os well they rule the roost dont they ? I mean we have Panther and tiger coming up much better than windows XP ...but still how many people have panther....windows will always have that price (when Free ) to performance ratio .....  And games is still windows Haven ....
__________________
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
|
|
|
16-09-2004, 11:41 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 1,634
|
longhorn will b launched late 2006 but i doubt if these components will b standard by then except 4 the graphics core and the RAM....
|
|
|
16-09-2004, 11:52 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
no way longhorn will have this much high requirments, this is pure bull, I have runned Longhorn WinHEC beta on my PC fine, & I m sure I only need 1 GB RAM when longhorn comes, rest in my PC is fine, & will run longhorn fine
Now the config of my PC will be lower end in 2006 for sure, well not bad for a 3 years old PC by that time
|
|
|
|
17-09-2004, 01:50 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Web Entrepreneur
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 584
|
I don't think tht will be standard for LH systems... and i also don't think above config will be a standard tht time... it will take some time processors to reach 6 or 6 + GHz frequency...
__________________
Live Chat with Doctors 24x7 on my site http://healthcaremagic.com
|
|
|
18-09-2004, 03:01 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In a creaking plashtik chair
Posts: 265
|
6G!!!! That's a 'long' shot!
__________________
An empire, 37 inches and growing...
|
|
|
19-09-2004, 06:36 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Not anywhere near you
Posts: 512
|
Don't belive what microsoft-watch.com says. They are the first to publish rumors about microsoft. If Longhorn requires this much config then no home pc user is going after it. Don't be just stupid. I have read in Microsoft's site that Longhorn will work fine in 128MB ram and 1GHz processor
__________________
http://geeksbay.monzilla.info - My Tech Blog :)
|
|
|
19-09-2004, 09:23 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
I m running Longhorn WInHEC beta fine on my 3.06 GHz wit FX5900XT, although now it is removed due to a lot of incompatibility, performance was smooth
I guess the minimum system requirments for longhorn will be somwthing arround 1 GHz CPU, 256 MB RAM, DX 9 based card with 64 MB RAM & 2 GB HD SPace for Windows installation including Page file
|
|
|
|
19-09-2004, 06:01 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 177
|
geez... even if that were true... what the hell was Longhorn gonna do with 1TB of storage....
and 2Gs of RAM is justified... Windows and its ever awesome memory management....
__________________
Vinayak
----------------------------------------------------
Dell XPS M1530: Intel C2D T5750, 4GB RAM, 250GB HDD, 256MB nVidia 8600GT GDDR3
Creative EP-630, Philips SHP 805.
|
|
|
20-09-2004, 06:56 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aizawl
Posts: 86
|
haha very funny, do u belive that... dont believe it man... I used Longhorh 4051 release and it works fine on 512 Mb ram 2.4 Ghz proc, maybe 4-6 ghz cpu will be there by 2006 (if u believe Moore's Law  but what about overheating ... theres a problem there..
__________________
Knowledge is power!
|
|
|
20-09-2004, 07:21 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Cooling won't be a pronblem, may be by that time Intel will start bundling Water cooling kits with the CPu, in which we can simply pour tap water
|
|
|
|
21-09-2004, 05:51 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Human Spambot
Join Date: May 2004
Location: off to "never ever" land
Posts: 2,912
|
guys
the beta works fine because its not complete yet
the final version WILL require a higher config ...
but i guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens without microsoft ..
__________________
No Mercy, No Limits.
Oobertech.net - Keeping Knowledge Free
|
|
|
23-09-2004, 05:13 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Zion
Posts: 12
|
Re: LONGHORN - can u believe this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by neeravkothari
"Microsoft is expected to recommend that the "average" Longhorn PC feature a dual-core CPU running at 4 to 6GHz; a minimum of 2 gigs of RAM; up to a terabyte of storage; a 1 Gbit, built-in, Ethernet-wired port and an 802.11g wireless link; and a graphics processor that runs three times faster than those on the market today. "
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/artic...1581842,00.asp
|
the article does say that MS never confirmed this only "Sources close" to them (may be even the author)
|
|
|
24-09-2004, 06:26 AM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 1,634
|
Re: LONGHORN - can u believe this?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ineo
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by neeravkothari
"Microsoft is expected to recommend that the "average" Longhorn PC feature a dual-core CPU running at 4 to 6GHz; a minimum of 2 gigs of RAM; up to a terabyte of storage; a 1 Gbit, built-in, Ethernet-wired port and an 802.11g wireless link; and a graphics processor that runs three times faster than those on the market today. "
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/artic...1581842,00.asp
|
where did you get this info from?
|
didnt he give the lin k 2 his source?????
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|