| Forum |
|
|||||||
| QnA (read only) Mods please help transfer the contents of this forum to proper sections. :) |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
|
I want to upgrade my hard-disk. i have a pretty old config. my system config is Intel Pentium IIIE 1GHz processor, Intel Whitney 810E mobo, 256 MB SDRAM, 20 GB hard-disk. 1. Will my system support SATA hard-disks ? 2. If it doesnt, Can i use some PCI adapter to make it compatible with SATA hard-disks ? 3. Is there a big difference between SATA and regular hard-disks ? 4. If i buy a regular hard-disk (PATA) and if i later upgrade my mobo to a latest model (say athlon xp 3200 ) , will there be any compatility issues ? Plz help me make a good decision. thanks vigo |
|
|
| Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them. | |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Rebooting
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 220.225.82.33
Posts: 6,200
|
its better to overhall ur system.... see SATA is definetly faster than PATA/UATA....
my suggetion.... if u can then wait till dual core procy become little chip... then go for a total system overhall.... as i see that ur config isnt bad atall..... |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
In The Zone
Join Date: May 2005
Location: JABALPUR (M.P)
Posts: 403
|
Hey a pci Raid Adapter would cost around 1.5k to 12k (This is the price till wat i have heard off !!!)
CHeers !!!
__________________
\"Live Life as it comes & Live it KINGSIZE\" \"Learn From Yesterday,Live For Today & Hope For Tomorrow\". Bye 4 Now - N_!_r_a_L |
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shhhh!!!!! on a sniper point
Posts: 4,151
|
There is not much difference b/w the perfomance of a SATA nd a PATA. Only the max theoritical bandwidth is different. So go fo a PATA.
Using Xtra cards would slow down the system nd U will not get the full benifit of SATA.
__________________
G1: PII X4 B50 4.0 | TRUE 120*2 | TA790GXB A2+ | 4GB DDR2 GSkill 1200 | Audigy 2 | HD4870 | HEC 550 | MX 518. G2: AII 240 | M2N 68AM+ | 3GB| 8800GT | Zebby Plat 500 G3: XPS M1530 | FZ 16. |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delhi
Posts: 270
|
yup , as aravind said the theoritical bandwidth is more . but as of now there aint much of a noticable diff in performances . mayb +5%
what i like bout sata is that the cable n connector r really small ( not as broad as those IDE 1z ) . it clutters ur system less n helps 2 some extent in ventilation
__________________
the genius of the hole : no matter how hard u try 2 get 2 the top , 1 mistake n u start again |
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 433
|
PATA 66+ cables are very easy to break, I found out they use single aluminium wire and just bending the cable will break it. I had major problems with bad cables not knowing why they become bad so easily. The older cables were no problem with twisting it around inside the case to make it fit properly... There should be no speed difference between SATA (150mhz) and PATA (133mhz) since all the hd's now come in both versions and only the interface is different. Of course if you run a RAID system the performance will be better with SATA just like using SCSI. So cable wise SATA is a much better alternative.. Not so much chance to break the cable....
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 1,150
|
There is only one vendor who has SATA disks at 10K rpm that is the WD raptor all other seagate, samsung etc have sata disks at 7200rpm only. I am using SATA disks in my P3 866 using a Silicom Image raid adaptor card costing Rs 2100/- and no problems on it.
__________________
**** happens |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|