Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > Portables, Peripherals and Electronics > QnA (read only)
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

QnA (read only) Mods please help transfer the contents of this forum to proper sections. :)

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 13-06-2005, 10:47 PM   #1 (permalink)
Right Off the Assembly Line
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
Default SATA or no SATA -- Plz help!!

Hi

I want to upgrade my hard-disk. i have a pretty old config. my system config is
Intel Pentium IIIE 1GHz processor,
Intel Whitney 810E mobo,
256 MB SDRAM,
20 GB hard-disk.

1. Will my system support SATA hard-disks ?
2. If it doesnt, Can i use some PCI adapter to make it compatible with SATA hard-disks ?
3. Is there a big difference between SATA and regular hard-disks ?
4. If i buy a regular hard-disk (PATA) and if i later upgrade my mobo to a latest model (say athlon xp 3200 ) , will there be any compatility issues ?

Plz help me make a good decision.

thanks
vigo
vigo is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 13-06-2005, 10:56 PM   #2 (permalink)
Rebooting
 
Choto Cheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 220.225.82.33
Posts: 6,200
Default

nope... P-III on 810E chip set wont support SATA.....

mate why PCI adaptor.... it will slow ur SATA to look like its UATA....

u cant use AMD with 810E mobo....
Choto Cheeta is offline  
Old 13-06-2005, 10:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
Rebooting
 
Choto Cheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 220.225.82.33
Posts: 6,200
Default

its better to overhall ur system.... see SATA is definetly faster than PATA/UATA....

my suggetion.... if u can then wait till dual core procy become little chip... then go for a total system overhall.... as i see that ur config isnt bad atall.....
Choto Cheeta is offline  
Old 13-06-2005, 11:34 PM   #4 (permalink)
Right Off the Assembly Line
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
Default

hi saurav

so is goin for a 80 GB regular hard disk better rite now ?
any idea how much that pci adapter wud cost ?


thanks
vigo
vigo is offline  
Old 15-06-2005, 08:38 AM   #5 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: JABALPUR (M.P)
Posts: 403
Default

Hey a pci Raid Adapter would cost around 1.5k to 12k (This is the price till wat i have heard off !!!)


CHeers !!!
__________________
\"Live Life as it comes & Live it KINGSIZE\"
\"Learn From Yesterday,Live For Today & Hope For Tomorrow\".
Bye 4 Now - N_!_r_a_L
King_Niral is offline  
Old 15-06-2005, 12:38 PM   #6 (permalink)
Wise Old Owl
 
dOm1naTOr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shhhh!!!!! on a sniper point
Posts: 4,151
Default

There is not much difference b/w the perfomance of a SATA nd a PATA. Only the max theoritical bandwidth is different. So go fo a PATA.
Using Xtra cards would slow down the system nd U will not get the full benifit of SATA.
__________________
G1: PII X4 B50 4.0 | TRUE 120*2 | TA790GXB A2+ | 4GB DDR2 GSkill 1200 | Audigy 2 | HD4870 | HEC 550 | MX 518.
G2: AII 240 | M2N 68AM+ | 3GB| 8800GT | Zebby Plat 500
G3: XPS M1530 |
FZ 16.
dOm1naTOr is offline  
Old 15-06-2005, 07:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delhi
Posts: 270
Default

yup , as aravind said the theoritical bandwidth is more . but as of now there aint much of a noticable diff in performances . mayb +5%

what i like bout sata is that the cable n connector r really small ( not as broad as those IDE 1z ) . it clutters ur system less n helps 2 some extent in ventilation
__________________
the genius of the hole : no matter how hard u try 2 get 2 the top , 1 mistake n u start again
mamba is offline  
Old 18-06-2005, 05:57 AM   #8 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 433
Default

PATA 66+ cables are very easy to break, I found out they use single aluminium wire and just bending the cable will break it. I had major problems with bad cables not knowing why they become bad so easily. The older cables were no problem with twisting it around inside the case to make it fit properly... There should be no speed difference between SATA (150mhz) and PATA (133mhz) since all the hd's now come in both versions and only the interface is different. Of course if you run a RAID system the performance will be better with SATA just like using SCSI. So cable wise SATA is a much better alternative.. Not so much chance to break the cable....
AlienTech is offline  
Old 19-06-2005, 02:25 PM   #9 (permalink)
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 94
Default

Hi. SATA is running st 10000 rpm. Your motherboard is old one so it will not support SATA so don't buy it.
parimal_xp2003 is offline  
Old 19-06-2005, 08:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
Wise Old Owl
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 1,150
Default

There is only one vendor who has SATA disks at 10K rpm that is the WD raptor all other seagate, samsung etc have sata disks at 7200rpm only. I am using SATA disks in my P3 866 using a Silicom Image raid adaptor card costing Rs 2100/- and no problems on it.
__________________
**** happens
pradeep_chauhan is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2