Unigine Heaven benchmark thread!

Jaskanwar Singh · 08-08-2011, 05:59 PM

Post your Unigine heaven Benchmark scores here.

Download the benchmark from here -
Download Heaven DX11 Benchmark | Unigine - advanced real-time 3D engine (for games and virtual reality systems)

Post a score screenshot and a GPU-Z screenshot too.
Download GPU-Z

Forum Username

CPU-clock(MHz)

GPU-Core/Memory(MHz)

Unigine Heaven Version

FPS

Score

Min FPS

Max FPS

Renderer

Mode

Shaders

Textures

Filter

Anisotropy

Occlusion

Refraction

Volumetric

Tessellation

Link

Cybertonic

AMD Athlon II x4 635 - 2912

AMD Radeon HD6850 - 825/1150

v2.5 Basic

24.3

611

7.1

45.8

direct3d11

1920x1080 fullscreen

high

trilinear

4x

enabled

normal

Link

Jaskanwar Singh

AMD Athlon II x4 635 - 2912

AMD Radeon HD6950 1GB (Unlocked) - 890/1375

v2.5 Basic

35

883

16.5

74

direct3d11

1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

normal

Link1, Link2, Link 3, Link 4, Link5 (6950 - Unlocked)

Sam

AMD Athlon II x4 635 - 2913

AMD Radeon HD5670 - 775/1000

v2.5 Basic

15.9

400

8.1

34.1

direct3d11

1600x900 fullscreen

high

trilinear

4x

enabled

normal

Link

Rajesh345

AMD Phenom II x6 1055t - 2812

AMD Radeon HD5750 - 700/1150

v2.5 Basic

17

428

6.1

37

direct3d11

1920x1080 fullscreen

high

trilinear

4x

enabled

normal

Link

Tenida

Intel Core i7 2600k - 3392

Nvidia Geforce GTX560 Ti - 880/1050

v2.5 Basic

41.6

1049

23.7

94.3

direct3d11

1920x1080 fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

normal

Link, Link2, Link3

rchi84

Intel Core i5 2400 - 3095

AMD Radeon HD6950 2GB(Unlocked) - 880/1375

v2.5 Basic

34.9

879

17.5

73.1

direct3d11

1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

4x

enabled

normal

Link (tested both with windows and ubuntu linux)

Skud

Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 - 2800

AMD Radeon HD6950 1GB - 800/1250

v2.5 Basic

49.5

1247

25.4

159.4

direct3d11

1920x1080 fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

normal

Link

Cilus

AMD Phenom II x6 1090t - 3207

AMD Radeon HD6870 Crossfire - 900/1050

v2.5 Basic

48.9

1233

15.1

103.5

direct3d11

1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

normal

Link

ithehappy

Intel Core i7 950 - 3073

Nvidia Geforce GTX560 Ti - 822/1002

v2.5 Basic

22

555

6.5

53

direct3d11

1680x1050 8xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

extreme

Link

d3p5kor

Intel Core i7 920 - 2698

Nvidia Geforce GTX570 - 732/1900

V2.5 Basic

32.1

808

7.5

76.7

direct3d11

1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

normal

Link

S_V

Intel Core i7 2600k - 3400

Nvidia Geforce GTX470 SLI - 607/1674

v2.5 Basic

42.7

1076

11.1

93

direct3d11

1920x1080 2xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

extreme

Link

mithun_mrg

Intel Core i3 530 -2940

Nvidia Geforce GTS450 - 950/1950

v2.5 Basic

31.6

796

19.3

75.6

direct3d11

1440x900 fullscreen

high

trilinear

4x

enabled

normal

Link

ico

Intel Core i5 2500k - 3310

AMD Radeon HD6950 2GB - 830/1300

v2.5 Basic

38.8

972

20.9

85

direct3d11

1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

normal

Link, Link2

topgear

AMD Athlon II x4 630 - 3611

AMD Radeon HD6850 - 1000/1150

v2.5 Basic

26.6

670

11.1

69

direct3d11

1280x1024 8xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

extreme

Link

mithun_mrg

Intel Core i3 530 - 2940

AMD Radeon HD6850 - 1000/1200

v2.5 Basic

51.4

1295

19.3

122.1

direct3d11

1440x900 fullscreen

high

trilinear

4x

enabled

normal

Link

dashing.sujay

Intel Core i5- 2430M - 2394

AMD Radeon HD6630M - 480/1024

v2.5 Basic

8.1

205

4.2

25.6

direct3d11

1920x1080 2xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

4x

enabled

extreme

Link

vizkid2005

Intel Core i5 760 - 2808

Nvidia Geforce GTX560 Ti - 880/1050

v2.5 Basic

19.7

497

6.5

47.7

direct3d11

1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

extreme

Link

d3p5kor

Intel Core i7 2600k - 3.4GHz

Nvidia Geforce GTX570 - 800/2000

V2.5 Basic

26.5

668

9.0

65.3

direct3d11

1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen

high

trilinear

16x

enabled

extreme

Link

Cybertonic · 09-08-2011, 10:39 PM

AMD Athlon ii x4 635 @ 3.1GHz
HD 6850 @ 825 Core and 1150 Memory
4GB DDR3 1333MHz 9-9-9-24

Jaskanwar Singh · 10-08-2011, 01:00 PM

@cybertonic
for some reason your cpu is not clocked to 3.1ghz during bench.

here is mine at 850/1300 GPU -

at stock (800/1250) -

waiting for others to post.

Cybertonic · 10-08-2011, 10:22 PM

I know there was some problem

. Otherwise I had OCed it to 3.1GHz using AMD Overdrive.

**Sam** · 11-08-2011, 12:04 AM

Athlon II X4 625 @ 2.9Ghz.

Tessellation is really heavy on my GPU. disabling it makes the benchmark swift.

Rajesh345 · 11-08-2011, 05:53 AM

All settings max

Tenida · 12-08-2011, 02:13 AM

Here's mine.

rchi84 · 13-08-2011, 11:26 AM

Some results from my own testing:

1) Stock clocks (800/1250) in Ubuntu 11.04 x64 (yes, that is right, no typo):

2) Stock clocks (800/1250) in Ubuntu 11.04 x64:

3) Stock clocks in Windows:

4) OCed to 880/1375:

5) Oced and on extreme tessellation:

Jaskanwar Singh · 13-08-2011, 12:50 PM

nice scores guys. as you were uploading many results i added links to your posts and mentioned one of your best scores.

Skud · 13-08-2011, 01:15 PM

Also mention the Heaven version people are using. Scores may differ across versions.

Jaskanwar Singh · 13-08-2011, 01:25 PM

ok skud.
BTW your score?

**Cilus** · 22-08-2011, 04:18 AM

My setting:-
Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3.2 GHz
Corsair XMS3 1600 MHz @ 9-9-9-24 @ 2T CR
HD 6870 Crossfire @ stock speed
Catalyst Control Center 11.7

Skud · 22-08-2011, 08:43 AM

Here's mine, all speeds are at stock. This one's tested earlier, so the driver is a bit older.

Jaskanwar Singh · 22-08-2011, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cilus

My setting:-
Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3.2 GHz
Corsair XMS3 1600 MHz @ 9-9-9-24 @ 2T CR
HD 6870 Crossfire @ stock speed
Catalyst Control Center 11.7

cilus i dont know but for some reason your fps are not upto the mark. you should have got much more.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skud

Here's mine, all speeds are at stock. This one's tested earlier, so the driver is a bit older.

and yours too skud.
check pm.

vickybat · 22-08-2011, 03:34 PM

Unigine heaven seems to be favouring nvidia gpu's. Tenida's 560-ti has the fastest fps and highest scores yet and even a 6870cf couldn't beat it.
Or maybe because he has the fastest cpu.

I think tesselation is a factor here and even set to normal mode, it is favoring nvidia.
This benchmark stresses more on the compute power of the gpu i guess.
Cilus also has a 1090t which is no slouch. So i guess cpu doesn't mater that much here.

I will post my results soon but will get the least scores though.

Terabyte · 22-08-2011, 03:39 PM

Cilus is using an older version(2.1) and Skud's processor is a bottleneck, that's why the low scores.

vickybat · 22-08-2011, 03:48 PM

^^What about rchi84? His processor shouldn't be a bottleneck right?

Jaskanwar's scores are almost identical and that too with 16x AF. Rchi84 used 4x and that's why the tad higher scores.
So i don't think cpu matters that much here. Jaskanwar's x4 635 is more than enough for this test. Like i said, gpu's computational abilities are tested here.

I agree that skud's processor is underpowered here because it doesn't belong to this or even previous generation. If i'm not wrong, 69xx series have better tesselation performance than 68xx series.

Just my opinion and i could be wrong though.

Skud · 22-08-2011, 04:53 PM

Tenida's score is without AA. That may be the reason, mine is with 8xAA, so is Jas'. And this is one benchmark which is not so kind to AA.

Cilus' is using v2.1, so can't really comment about his scores.

I will put my score without AA.

vickybat · 22-08-2011, 05:52 PM

^^ Also post some scores with extreme tesselation. I will ask tenida to post his and with 8xaa with normal and extreme tess as well.

How did you enable aa ? I mean the settings has no aa in it. Did you override in catalyst control center?

Skud · 22-08-2011, 06:55 PM

AFAIR, it allows for selection of AA, AF, Tessellation etc. at the start in a small screen from where you launch the app. And regarding Extreme tess, at least in my case that's sort of useless, but let me find if some old results are saved.

Skud · 22-08-2011, 08:00 PM

Here's my result with AA turned off:-

So a score of 1247 on this stock CPU and shitty RAM and stock GPU is not bad. I guess, heaven is not CPU dependent at all.

@Tenida: please post your results with 8xAA.

vickybat · 22-08-2011, 08:16 PM

^^ wow really aa diminshed the performance a lot.

Can you try extreme tess? I guess i was wrong then but was right on the cpu's.

I was wondering on fact though. Does 32 bit os makes a difference in scores from a 64 bit os?

Tenida · 22-08-2011, 08:19 PM

With Tessellation-Extreme

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skud

Here's my result with AA turned off:-

So a score of 1247 on this stock CPU and shitty RAM and stock GPU is not bad. I guess, heaven is not CPU dependent at all.

Try this test on Windows 7 64 Bit.

Skud · 22-08-2011, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenida

With Tessellation-Extreme

Spoiler:

Try this test on Windows 7 64 Bit.

Pretty good. Give us a result of normal tess and 8xAA. That would be helpful in comparing the cards.

Let me see if it's possible to get the results in a 64-bit Win7.

Tenida · 22-08-2011, 09:21 PM

Guys check this result
Settings
4xAA
16xAF
Shaders = High
Tessellation = Normal

Source

Skud · 22-08-2011, 09:48 PM

OK, but which version?

Tenida · 22-08-2011, 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skud

OK, but which version?

I think its current version i.e. 2.5

**Cilus** · 22-08-2011, 10:02 PM

Guys here is the result using Unigen 2.5. My score is 1445 now

With 8X AA and 16X AF the score is 1233 with avg fps 48.9. HD 6870 CF is indeed powerful.

Tenida · 22-08-2011, 10:04 PM

Also check this

Jaskanwar Singh · 23-08-2011, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vickybat

^^ Also post some scores with extreme tesselation. I will ask tenida to post his and with 8xaa with normal and extreme tess as well.

How did you enable aa ? I mean the settings has no aa in it. Did you override in catalyst control center?

you enable aa here -

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skud

Here's my result with AA turned off:-

So a score of 1247 on this stock CPU and shitty RAM and stock GPU is not bad. I guess, heaven is not CPU dependent at all.

@Tenida: please post your results with 8xAA.

am i dreaming or what? i mean check mine at 850/1300 -

does a 64bit windows do that much of a damage?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tenida

With Tessellation-Extreme

Try this test on Windows 7 64 Bit.

you want me put put this or previous score?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cilus

Guys here is the result using Unigen 2.5. My score is 1445 now

With 8X AA and 16X AF the score is 1233 with avg fps 48.9. HD 6870 CF is indeed powerful.

now its performing like a beast

@skud, tenida, cilus

make sure everything is set to high(AA, AF, Shaders etc). now after starting it, on top you will see a tessellation tab. set everything to max (value - 2.0).

I mean i was just 'WOW'. ultimate visual bliss.
you will see your gpus crawl in front of dragon's power (except cilus)

this tessellation is just awesome. i just hope amd and nvidia paid good attention to ultimate tessellation levels in their upcoming gpus

but dont fiddle with that tessellation tab during benching for this test. no cheating