Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > Software > Open Source
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Open Source A place where you can talk to like-minded people about the fastest growing software movement today! Discuss anything and everything about Open Source software and Operating Systems.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20-05-2007, 03:16 AM   #1 (permalink)
left this forum longback
 
praka123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,513
Question Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blacklight
its a memory hogger ...uses up all the RAM it gets..but having said that ,let me also add that vista is running exactly like its supposed to.If u add another 2 GB RAM, vista will use that up too..the logic behind this is that un utilized RAM is wasted RAM. so it utilizes fully the available RAM.But if u launch another ram hungry app, more memory is allocated to that.
To cut a long story short,upgrading your RAM might not mean u will find RAM utilization at lesser levels ,but it does mean u will get a better and faster vista .
http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/show...26&postcount=3
^^I have been going through threads saying Vista got better memory management.ie,it completely uses given memory.for eg:Vista recommends 1GB min ram.if u add 2 GB,Vista will use it completely.even Vista readyboost/superfetch? can use usb pen drive to boot fast.
So does Linux kernel at this point supports such a function

http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/kernel/wmm.mspx
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000688.html
http://gentoo-wiki.com/FAQ_Linux_Memory_Management
http://linux-mm.org/
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
praka123 is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 20-05-2007, 05:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
El mooooo
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

Quote:
Originally Posted by praka123
So does Linux kernel at this point supports such a function
Yes a similar technology is currently available in Kernel since long time. You can check the amount of files prefetched in your RAM by running "free -m" command
Code:
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           972        957         15          0         40        275
-/+ buffers/cache:        641        330
Swap:          768          0        768
As you can see, my 972 MB memory is almost fully used but if you remove the files cached...I have 330 MB free.

As far as using a USB drive as swap file...you can easily do that in Linux by creating a swap partition on your USB drive and using swapon command. Also, afaik we were already discussing in Technology News that superfetch is not providing much performance boost to Vista and in some cases might even reduce the performance.

P.S. I have not read your links but I have presumed that you are talking about Vista using RAM to the full and using USB drive for quick swapping.
__________________
Windows users shouldn't get to use the real computers. They know just enough to be dangerous.
eddie is offline  
Old 20-05-2007, 06:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
left this forum longback
 
praka123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,513
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

So M$ presents these technologies to the ppl in a glorious way!which is available for Linux? too
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
praka123 is offline  
Old 20-05-2007, 07:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
MMO Addict
 
amitava82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,467
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

just a marketing trick by M$...
__________________
Steam Profile || Personal Page
Warp drive active. Approaching stargate.
amitava82 is offline  
Old 20-05-2007, 08:11 PM   #5 (permalink)
El mooooo
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

Quote:
Originally Posted by praka123
So M$ presents these technologies to the ppl in a glorious way!which is available for Linux? too
What were you thinking that they actually INNOVATED something huge?
__________________
Windows users shouldn't get to use the real computers. They know just enough to be dangerous.
eddie is offline  
Old 21-05-2007, 08:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
left this forum longback
 
praka123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,513
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

Infact M$ is very good in marketing.
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
praka123 is offline  
Old 21-05-2007, 08:45 PM   #7 (permalink)
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
 
kalpik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,404
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

^^ That's the ONLY thing it is good at
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
kalpik is offline  
Old 21-05-2007, 10:20 PM   #8 (permalink)
18 Till I Die............
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: India, Mumbai, Marine Lines
Posts: 5,792
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalpik
^^ That's the ONLY thing it is good at
shh! If gx and his chotte miyan hear that you'll be in trouble.
mehulved is offline  
Old 21-05-2007, 11:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
MMO Addict
 
amitava82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,467
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

LoL.. look at my sign..
__________________
Steam Profile || Personal Page
Warp drive active. Approaching stargate.
amitava82 is offline  
Old 21-05-2007, 11:34 PM   #10 (permalink)
The G-Axe Effect
 
gxsaurav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 5,579
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie
What were you thinking that they actually INNOVATED something huge?
Yup....all the features Windows has were already there in other OS even before they had a proper GUI. It is just that after these features came out in usable form with Windows Vista, Other OS users realized how much they missed by not making it usable previously
__________________
Graphics & Web Designer - SlideShare
Portfolio & Blog : http://gxsaurav.com
gxsaurav is offline  
Old 21-05-2007, 11:40 PM   #11 (permalink)
dá ûnrêäl Kiñg
 
zyberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: kerala/calicut
Posts: 981
Smile Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

Yeah MS is good at taking things to next level( think of .net platform)
__________________
My Stomach pains
http://tinyurl.com/32jj4m
zyberboy is offline  
Old 21-05-2007, 11:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
El mooooo
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mehulved
shh! If gx and his chotte miyan hear that you'll be in trouble.
Speak of the devil and the devil is here (with his stupid comments of course)
__________________
Windows users shouldn't get to use the real computers. They know just enough to be dangerous.
eddie is offline  
Old 21-05-2007, 11:51 PM   #13 (permalink)
Commander in Chief
 
QwertyManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,657
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

Quote:
Originally Posted by gxbabablah
Yup....all the features Windows has were already there in other OS even before they had a proper GUI. It is just that after these features came out in usable form with Windows Vista, Other OS users realized how much they missed by not making it usable previously
Oooooh look! We made a glowing titlebar which is transparent now and suddenly opaque cause you click the maximize! Wow we rule! Other OSes are gonna follow us now.



Aw. Shaddap. An X always closes the window. Glow or not.
__________________
Harsh J
www.harshj.com
QwertyManiac is offline  
Old 22-05-2007, 12:48 AM   #14 (permalink)
left this forum longback
 
praka123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,513
Wink Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

How many patents does Vista infringes?
now how can vista use unix "sudo"
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
praka123 is offline  
Old 22-05-2007, 01:04 AM   #15 (permalink)
El mooooo
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
Default Re: Does win-Vista better in memory-management than Linux?

I don't think that memory handling we are talking in here is patented by Linux or any other operating system for that matter so talking about patents in this thread is not relevant
__________________
Windows users shouldn't get to use the real computers. They know just enough to be dangerous.
eddie is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Power management of Windows Vista Vs Windows XP Ankur Mittal Technology News 1 15-05-2007 04:53 PM
Why Does Vista Use All My Memory? blackpearl Software Q&A 8 01-03-2007 02:14 AM
Memory usage on vista ? rajasekharan Software Q&A 2 22-12-2006 03:22 AM


All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 12:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2