Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > Software > Open Source
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Open Source A place where you can talk to like-minded people about the fastest growing software movement today! Discuss anything and everything about Open Source software and Operating Systems.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-10-2006, 11:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ahmedabad
Posts: 79
Default which 64bitLinux

I have AMD64 2800+, 512 RAM, 256 8X AGP, 80GB . i want to use linux for Maya & Softimage XSI. so please tell me which 64bitLinux free version is available ??????
savithk is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 24-10-2006, 11:18 AM   #2 (permalink)
"The Cake is a Lie!!"
 
[xubz]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 471
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

I Suggest you get Fedora Core.. (FC6 was Released Today).

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
__________________
[xubz] ● http://xubz.com/
[steam_id] ● http://steamcommunity.com/id/xubz
[xubz] is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 12:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
In The Zone
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 360
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

fedora rocks
__________________
Dhiraj Thakur
thakur.dheeraj(@)gmail.com
Desi-Tek.com is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 12:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
Right Off the Assembly Line
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 28
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

I am using Mandriva 2007 64bit.

It has great support for AIGLX, and the 3D effects are cool.

If you need the CD , PM me .

Enjoy.
BirBal.
www.techbirbal.com
techbirbal is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 12:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
"The Cake is a Lie!!"
 
[xubz]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 471
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

AIGLX was Jointed Developed by NVIDIA and Red Hat.. so Obviously Fedora has the Leading Edge here..

AIGLX is ALSO Supported on Ubuntu 6.10, with the Latest NVIDIA Beta Drivers.


(I Only reason I Love Ubuntu is cuz of its Community and APT)
__________________
[xubz] ● http://xubz.com/
[steam_id] ● http://steamcommunity.com/id/xubz
[xubz] is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 12:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
Right Off the Assembly Line
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 28
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Dont Forget Xgl too on mandrake.

You also have the latest Cedega software to play Windows Games in Linux.

Enjoy!!
techbirbal is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 12:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
18 Till I Die............
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: India, Mumbai, Marine Lines
Posts: 5,792
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Well all the distros can have all that. So stating one has it is totally absurd.
But, it is not advisable to use a 64 bit distro as of now due to lack of availability of 64 bit softwares. No. of 64 bit software at present are lower than 32 bit ones. We will have to wait some more time before focus shifts completely to 64 bit.
__________________
http://www.bash.org/?258908
mehulved is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 01:45 PM   #8 (permalink)
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ahmedabad
Posts: 79
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Mandriva 2007 64bit is free ?????
__________
i want to install only free version of linux64 bit

Last edited by savithk; 24-10-2006 at 01:45 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
savithk is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 04:31 PM   #9 (permalink)
Right Off the Assembly Line
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 28
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

yup mandriva 2007 is free.

Its a 4 CD pack for 64 bit edition
techbirbal is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 04:42 PM   #10 (permalink)
GaurishSharma.com
 
gary4gar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jaipur
Posts: 4,097
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

if u want 64 bit linux then u have to install 32 bit one in it as still there is no flash,java & many app
gary4gar is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 04:45 PM   #11 (permalink)
Wise Old Owl
 
JGuru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Space-time continuum
Posts: 1,646
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

You can download Mandriva 2007 Linux (64-bit or 32-bit) from here
I doubt whether you can run 32-bit applications like Java, Flash & other 32-bit applications.
So installing a 32-bit version of Mandriva 2007 Linux is a better & sound choice.
Don't worry you can install a 32-bit Linux in your 64-bit AMD PC.
There won't be any problem. But you won't get the 64-bit PC performance.
__________________
* Imagination is more important than knowledge.
-Albert Einstein

Last edited by JGuru; 24-10-2006 at 04:51 PM.
JGuru is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 04:46 PM   #12 (permalink)
HELP AND SUPPORT
 
rakeshishere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,595
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Better use 32 bit ubuntu v6.10 going to be released on 26 October 2006
rakeshishere is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 04:48 PM   #13 (permalink)
-The BlacKCoaT Operative-
 
Rollercoaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dehradun, India
Posts: 1,205
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

it is a pain to get all ur hardware working on 64 bit
__________________
--------------------------------------------
Holding my last breath, safe inside myself.....
--------------------------------------------
I dont use my computer. I misuse it- रोलरकोस्टर
Rollercoaster is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 05:49 PM   #14 (permalink)
left this forum longback
 
praka123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,513
Post Re: which 64bitLinux

well i found this gentoo forum thread useful for all amd-64 users and aspirants
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-221361.html
Quote:
mplayer / xine dont play some movies , *.wmv/*.rm/win32codecs dont work
A: You need 32bit mplayer to use 32bit codecs (for stuff like wmv9 and real). No win64codecs are currently availible.
Take a look at this guide and this topics: xine thread or this mplayer thread or just search for "mplayer" in amd64 forum what will answer your questions on this topic more completely. 32bit realpayer also works on amd64 if you want to play *.rm files.
See here what gentoo-wiki has to say about it.
below wiki article also may hold great use:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_AMD_64
__________________
left this forum long back.Admin Can Delete this Account and posts Permanantly.Thank You
Get GNU/Linux - http://getgnulinux.org
praka123 is offline  
Old 24-10-2006, 10:44 PM   #15 (permalink)
GaurishSharma.com
 
gary4gar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jaipur
Posts: 4,097
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

^^^
so net result is
if your are new to linux, 64bit is a abosulute no-no but if are a g33k then u can try ur hand
gary4gar is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 12:47 AM   #16 (permalink)
No pain....No gain
 
john_the_ultimate's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 1,198
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

I've got ubuntu 6.06 AMD 64-bit version and works flawlessly. Even recognised my dual core X2 3800+ CPU.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------
Faith is the boast of a man who is too lazy to investigate.
---------------------------------------------------
john_the_ultimate is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 01:58 AM   #17 (permalink)
El mooooo
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

There is a thumb rule while planning to use a 64bit Linux depending on the amount of RAM you have. It goes like this...
< 1 GB RAM = 32 bit user land - 32 bit kernel
= 1 GB RAM = 32 bit user land - 64 bit kernel
> 1 GB RAM = 64 bit user land - 64 bit kernel

Since you just have 512 MB RAM, imho you should stay with 32 bit Linux distros. Rest is upto you...

[EDIT}I have changed user space to user land so that it is clearer[/EDIT]

Last edited by eddie; 25-10-2006 at 10:39 AM.
eddie is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 08:00 AM   #18 (permalink)
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
 
kalpik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,404
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

eddie, can you explain the logic behind it? And what do you mean when you say user space?
kalpik is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 10:11 AM   #19 (permalink)
String Phreak
 
mediator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In ur Evil Mind!
Posts: 2,453
Wink Re: which 64bitLinux

Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie
There is a thumb rule while planning to use a 64bit Linux depending on the amount of RAM you have. It goes like this...
< 1 GB RAM = 32 bit user space - 32 bit kernel
= 1 GB RAM = 32 bit user space - 64 bit kernel
> 1 GB RAM = 64 bit user space - 64 bit kernel

Since you just have 512 MB RAM, imho you should stay with 32 bit Linux distros. Rest is upto you...
No eddie, >1GB ram doesn't necessarily means 64 bit system. There's no thumb rule in my knowledge, but all it has a little scientific explanation!

See 32 bit means 2^32 (2 raised to power 32) = 4,294,967,296 bytes and that's 4 GB.
SO u see a 32 bit system has a maximum supported RAM size of 4 GB.

Similarly 64 bit system has a max. supported RAM size of 2^64 = 18446744,073,709,551,616. I dunno how many billion terrabytes are these. I guess they call it 16 exabytes. Nice na?

Neways I dunno why u have written user space ad kernel space differently, both are just classifications of virtual memory .

@kalpiks : Users space is the user memory, where user apps can work and where swapping takes place.
__________________
Bad Bad server.....No candy for u!

Last edited by mediator; 25-10-2006 at 10:21 AM.
mediator is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 11:24 AM   #20 (permalink)
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ahmedabad
Posts: 79
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

if i install linux64 on my AMD64 2800+ is support ???. i have only 512 MB of Ram it is ok for linux64 . or should i go for 1GB of RAM ????. any linux64 is available on single CD.????
savithk is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 11:34 AM   #21 (permalink)
-The BlacKCoaT Operative-
 
Rollercoaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dehradun, India
Posts: 1,205
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

yes it will work fine.. dont depend on the seemingly hightech talk goin on

i assure u no one actually knows anything
__________________
--------------------------------------------
Holding my last breath, safe inside myself.....
--------------------------------------------
I dont use my computer. I misuse it- रोलरकोस्टर
Rollercoaster is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 11:34 AM   #22 (permalink)
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
 
kalpik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,404
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Quote:
Originally Posted by mediator
@kalpik : Users space is the user memory, where user apps can work and where swapping takes place.
Exactly.. Even i thot that.. That's why i was confused when he mentioned them separately..
kalpik is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 11:41 AM   #23 (permalink)
El mooooo
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Quote:
Originally Posted by mediator
No eddie, >1GB ram doesn't necessarily means 64 bit system. There's no thumb rule in my knowledge, but all it has a little scientific explanation!

See 32 bit means 2^32 (2 raised to power 32) = 4,294,967,296 bytes and that's 4 GB.
SO u see a 32 bit system has a maximum supported RAM size of 4 GB.

Similarly 64 bit system has a max. supported RAM size of 2^64 = 18446744,073,709,551,616. I dunno how many billion terrabytes are these. I guess they call it 16 exabytes. Nice na?

Neways I dunno why u have written user space ad kernel space differently, both are just classifications of virtual memory .
Mediator the explanation given by you is theoretical but practically Linux kernel has a problem which was first identified in 2001. 32bit Linux Kernel splits the 4GB memory in two parts of 1GB and 3GB. Now kernel needs to map virtual space for every process to physically available memory but at any given point *unpatched* Linux kernel can map only 1GB of kernel virtual space to the physical memory. Further, out of this 1GB Memory, 128MB is reserved for storing memory mapping and paging table structures which is done only when kernel has to handle huge amounts of physical memory (>=1GB). This in turn means that Linux kernel can *effectively* access only 1GB - 128MB = 896MB of physical memory at any given time.

To solve this problem, two things were put under development. One of them was community driven 2GB/2GB and 3GB/1GB mem split patches. This was done to increase the amount of memory accessible by kernel space to 2GB and 3GB respectively. This approach was not widely accepted because it was more of a hack put together by a few developers so another set of patches was developed by kernel devs. This is known as HIGHMEM support and comes in two forms i.e. 4GB and 64GB memory support. 64GB HIGHMEM support was developed for processors like PentiumPro that were released with special instructions to address 4GB Memory limitation and increased it to 64GB.

This HIGHMEM support sounds interesting but it has its own share of problems. It is still not well tested and breaks drivers on random. Also, I/O devices cannot access HIGHMEM support directly and rather need to go through specific processes in kernel space. This leads to unnecessary overhead in kernel space and if possible, it should be avoided. Thus, moving on to 64bit kernel is advised.

Now coming to the thumb rule.

1) Anything below 896MB of Physical memory can be accessed directly by 32bit kernel. Also 64bit binaries are larger in size and they will take more space in RAM thus hogging your memory. This will nullify the performance boost your are supposed to get because you simply don't have enough RAM hence 32bit kernel and 32bit applications are recommended.
2) Next, we move to the limit of 896MB - 1GB. Here you need to make a choice. If you are very picky and do not want to waste even the 128MB of RAM then 64bit kernel and 32bit applications are recommended. The idea is NOT to enable HIGHMEM support just to access that 128MB of RAM because it increases kernel overload without much benefit but use the full amount of RAM at your disposal. 32bit applications are recommended for the same reason that is given above.
3) After this we come to >1GB Physical memory. Now here you have a choice of using HIGHMEM support (or) using just 64bit kernel (or) moving completely to 64bit system. Here, it totally depends on you and your choice but going to a full 64bit system is recommended because:
a) It avoids using HIGHMEM which is still not well tested.
b) 64bit kernel will address memory limitations and provide you a little extra performance boost.
b) 64bit binaries are known to be larger then 32bit binaries in Linux environment but the extra physical memory at your disposal allows you to gain that little extra by optimizing them for 64bit and not care about memory hogging.

Hence the thumb rule...

Last edited by eddie; 25-10-2006 at 12:27 PM.
eddie is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 12:34 PM   #24 (permalink)
String Phreak
 
mediator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In ur Evil Mind!
Posts: 2,453
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Hmmm......I didn't know something like that existed practically! Neways I'll be pleased if u enlighten me on following questions.

1. If the bug was founded in 2001, then whats the present status?

2.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddie
support. 64GB HIGHMEM support was developed for processors like PentiumPro that were released with special instructions to address 4GB Memory limitation and increased it to 64GB.
Is it 64 bit HIGHMEM that u mistakenly typed as 64 GB?? IF not so, then how 4GB was increased to 64 GB? I didnt get this one!

Neways I hope the thumb rule will be eliminated in future 32 bit Linuxes and I wonder if they are having trouble with 32 bit, then how'll they manage 64 bit and how'll they partition the exabytes!!
__________________
Bad Bad server.....No candy for u!
mediator is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 12:50 PM   #25 (permalink)
El mooooo
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Quote:
Originally Posted by mediator
Hmmm......I didn't know something like that existed practically! Neways I'll be pleased if u enlighten me on following questions.

1. If the bug was founded in 2001, then whats the present status?
It is not a bug but a limitation that has been addressed using patches. The current status is that both HIGHMEM 4GB and 64GB patches are present in official kernel. You can enable it if you have more than 1GB RAM but with earlier said kernel overload.
Quote:
2. Is it 64 bit HIGHMEM that u mistakenly typed as 64 GB?? IF not so, then how 4GB was increased to 64 GB? I didnt get this one!
The answer lies in PentiumPro architecture and the PEA extension that it came with. These processors supported 36bit which translated into 64GB of physical memory support. Thus the kernel was made to support full memory range which could be supported by the processor but as the user land is 32bit, each process can't grow beyond 4GB. If you remember...this is why 36bit experiment of Intel failed miserably
Quote:
Neways I hope the thumb rule will be eliminated in future 32 bit Linuxes and I wonder if they are having trouble with 32 bit, then how'll they manage 64 bit and how'll they partition the exabytes!!
When we will near exabytes, I am sure we will know about the limitations and they will be dealt with accordingly
eddie is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 01:02 PM   #26 (permalink)
String Phreak
 
mediator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In ur Evil Mind!
Posts: 2,453
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Still a confusion! Can't the Linux kernel on 32 bit machine access the whole 4 GB RAM with patches already applied??
__________________
Bad Bad server.....No candy for u!
mediator is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 01:19 PM   #27 (permalink)
El mooooo
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Ofcourse it can!!! That is the whole point of applying the patches but when we talk about a choice between staying with "32bit system + HIGHMEM patches" and 64bit system...moving to 64bit is advisable.
eddie is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 01:32 PM   #28 (permalink)
18 Till I Die............
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: India, Mumbai, Marine Lines
Posts: 5,792
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Eddie can you provide some links on this stuff, if you have some handy. I do understand part of it cos I have come across it while compiling a kernel. But still a major part of the explaination is unclear to me. If you can direct me to some resources that explain this, that would be great.
__________________
http://www.bash.org/?258908
mehulved is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 01:56 PM   #29 (permalink)
El mooooo
 
eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: India
Posts: 1,414
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

Actually I saw this discussion happening some months back on gentoo-user mailing list. At that time there were links to lkml archives and detailed explanations but I am somehow not able to find those mails. May be you can search lkml and gentoo-user archives?
eddie is offline  
Old 25-10-2006, 02:42 PM   #30 (permalink)
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ahmedabad
Posts: 79
Default Re: which 64bitLinux

i have a Q if i install 64bit linux . can i install 32bit linux software in 64bit linux. any linux64 is available on single CD.????
savithk is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2