|
View Poll Results: Which is the Best Window Manager?
|
|
FVWM
|
  
|
1 |
12.50% |
|
AfterStep
|
  
|
1 |
12.50% |
|
Fluxbox
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Motif
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Sawfish
|
  
|
1 |
12.50% |
|
Metacity
|
  
|
2 |
25.00% |
|
Openbox
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Blackbox
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
ICE WM
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
Enlightment
|
  
|
3 |
37.50% |
 |
04-01-2006, 01:05 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ** Hosur ** Operating System:GNU
Posts: 451
|
The Best of Window Managers
Please vote for the best Window manager..
And also post which feature of it you like the most..
Apart From this there are lot more WM's I have Included only a few popular ones..
If the WM you use/like is not on the poll plz post a reply.
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
04-01-2006, 01:40 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chennai , India
Posts: 693
|
Enlightenment of course. It's graphically Great, Fast, Light, Flexible..
__________________
Call it Emacs,
Love it or Leave it.
|
|
|
04-01-2006, 02:44 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 780
|
FVWM, its fast and extremely configurable.
__________________
Hardware - Celeron 266 MHz, 128MB RAM, Intel i740 8MB RAM
Software - Slackware Linux 10.1; Archlinux 0.7; Windows 98 SE
Humanware - GS/CS C++ L+++ w b+++ DI+ D+ e
|
|
|
04-01-2006, 06:50 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,659
|
What about window maker...Its cool to..I also lke afterstep..
|
|
|
04-01-2006, 06:57 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,135
|
Another vote for Enlightenment
__________________
A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer.
|
|
|
04-01-2006, 10:18 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 353
|
hmm i must say my limited knowledge of linux is sooooo limited...
i have never used anything other than Gnome and KDE...
Hmm... maybe i can try out the "winner" of this thread/poll...
Prav.
__________________
The Bloglines of an Angry Indian -
www.angry-indian.com
If only life were as easy as Ctrl+Z (undo) and F4/Ctrl+Y (redo)...
|
|
|
04-01-2006, 10:36 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
18 Till I Die............
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: India, Mumbai, Marine Lines
Posts: 5,792
|
I tried out enlightenment yesterday for the first time. I was rahter impressed with it. It had a neat look and feel. Was low on RAM usage and quite fast. I am still to learn more about it but I've already started liking it a lot.
__________________
http://www.bash.org/?258908
|
|
|
05-01-2006, 02:17 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chennai , India
Posts: 693
|
@praveen:- GNOME usually runs above metacity, so you can vote for it!!
__________________
Call it Emacs,
Love it or Leave it.
|
|
|
05-01-2006, 05:07 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
left this forum longback
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
|
GNOME and KDE are also essentially window managers.might have included that to see the actual poll result..
|
|
|
05-01-2006, 08:24 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chennai , India
Posts: 693
|
@Prakash:- Correct me if wrong, but GNOME is actually a desktop environment which runs over another window manager which inturn runs over the crude x.
ie., The click, counter click( a.k.a rightclick) and other functions are provided by X, The dragging from one application to another, minimizing and maximising, shading etc are provided by the windows manager, and the Desktop Environment resides on top of the window manager utilizing with it's functions with it's own set of applications, like GNOME.
Correct me if wrong! :roll:
|
|
|
05-01-2006, 10:13 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
left this forum longback
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: -
Posts: 7,536
|
Basically ur correct.but i believe... more than other WM's GNOME and KDE are Desktop Environments with Window Manager already packed in.Thus making a single best Window Manager which is much more usable than other single WMs..Also U may not be able to use any WM's simply with GNOME or KDE..without atleast some tweaks....For eg; kde works better/successfull with kwm or GNOME with metacity etc....Also i feel like How dry it will look @ Desktop with some lightweight WMs..[No,NNO OFFENSE!]
I will say GNOME and KDE makes a better Window Managers..
|
|
|
05-01-2006, 10:44 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chennai , India
Posts: 693
|
I have nothing more but to simply agree to what you say prakash  , but lets consider enlightenment, which infact is a full blown windows manager, with good (great, infact  )look and feel and almost a file manager (under development). So If only it had some more widgets and epplets built into it and some user friendly configuration tools (meaning we don't have to edit the directories manually), We would be better off using it rather than memory hogging GNOME or KDE in situations such as setting up a gaming machine that's gonna be used for running tux-friendly games such as doom3 and quake. Which is infact a terrific prospect!!
__________________
Call it Emacs,
Love it or Leave it.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|