|
View Poll Results: Which is your favorite desktop enviroment ?
|
|
KDE
|
  
|
10 |
45.45% |
|
GNOME
|
  
|
9 |
40.91% |
|
ICEWM
|
  
|
1 |
4.55% |
|
XFCE
|
  
|
2 |
9.09% |
|
FLUXBOX
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
|
JWM
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
 |
|
09-08-2005, 08:13 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,659
|
FAVORITE DESKTOP ENVIROMENT
Which is your favorite desktop enviroment ?
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
09-08-2005, 08:22 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 353
|
Hmm
I doubt whether any other DE's except KDE and GDE/GDM would get much votes anyways!!!
Cheers!!!
] K8)8) [
__________________
The Bloglines of an Angry Indian -
www.angry-indian.com
If only life were as easy as Ctrl+Z (undo) and F4/Ctrl+Y (redo)...
|
|
|
09-08-2005, 11:25 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Microsoft MVP
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: AskVG.com
Posts: 5,173
|
My vote is for GNOME.
I like it because of its simplicity.
The interface is simple & nice.
|
|
|
09-08-2005, 06:05 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 1,096
|
GNOME, no doubt
__________________
Sometime you'll think you understand everything
...Then you'll regain consciousness
|
|
|
09-08-2005, 06:37 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,659
|
I am the only one who voted for xfce.Its a good desktop enviroment and very light on resources.But wel every has to be different.
|
|
|
09-08-2005, 06:47 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Commander in Chief
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,658
|
We got heavy machines so no XCFE only KDE or GNOME buddy...
__________________
Harsh J
www.harshj.com
|
|
|
09-08-2005, 07:36 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 780
|
I had a poll like this sometime ago, difficult to get many votes for something other than KDE/Gnome.
Some of the options are not desktop environments, but simple window managers, so anyway I will name my favourites from both areas.
FVWM has to be the greatest, fastest, most powerful window manager in existance. Every bit of it can be customised to make it look or feel like MVM, Windows 95, Mac, or anything you can imagine. You can customise the application window buttons, hey bindings, specify powerful functions to perform complex tasks, and what not. The problem is that configuring it is not so easy, and it can take quite a while. But you do have many sample config files available, which will help get you started quickly.
IceWM follows next in line, it is not as configurable as FVWM, but it has quite a decent out of the box look and feel, it provides a nice integrated taskbar, with a windows 98 look (menu, quick launch items, taskbar, clock), so it makes it good for people migrating from windows. Currently I am back to IceWM because I am facing certain problems with getting a net monitor to work on FVWM.
Blackbox is another nice one, switching between applications may be a little awkward at first, if like me, you maximise every open window. But on undersanding the little controls on its taskbar, it can be a very efficient and fast window manager.
Coming to desktop environments,
Although KDE is quite fast, I prefer XFCE to it for its simple elegance. It looks quite nice and provides a light alternative to Gnome.
EDE (Equinox Desktop Environment) is a very fast EFLTK based desktop, it resembles windows 9x in appearance and provides many good GUI tools for frequently used purposes.
__________________
Hardware - Celeron 266 MHz, 128MB RAM, Intel i740 8MB RAM
Software - Slackware Linux 10.1; Archlinux 0.7; Windows 98 SE
Humanware - GS/CS C++ L+++ w b+++ DI+ D+ e
|
|
|
09-08-2005, 08:50 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 16
|
Gnome and KDE both! You should use checkbox for poll like this! But Gnome gets somewhat more marks as I use it as develop the things for it!
__________________
Kartik Mistry, gnu/linux developer
Blog: http://kartikm.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------
Debian Sarge / Ubuntu Hoary 5.04
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 07:45 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bangalore, India
Posts: 154
|
Strangely enough no body talkes about enlightenment.
Its actualy one of the fastest despite the fact that it alredy have more eye candy than upcomming windows vista, and that all incredebly runs on CPU cycles, no graphics card(read opengl) needed but if you have one its is also supported.
I am actualy waiting them to complete the dr17, if they release it soon of course. Unfortunately for the uninitiated it will be tad difficult to work on it.
For the time being Gnome take the cake for more mature UI. Thie insistense of UI guidelines make it the neatest DE.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------
Blender India forums
http://www.bestfreeforums.com/forums/blenderindia.html
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 03:08 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: YOU CAN'T SEE ME
Posts: 68
|
GNOME is good but KDE provides a lot more applications.
Anywys i like GNOME for its simple user interface.
__________________
It\'s a truism that our worst affected wounds are self inflicted
Just Another F*$%/ed up day in Paradise
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 03:32 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Web Entrepreneur
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 584
|
KDE only ... whenever... I go to zone-3 in the lab... once in a week...
GNOME tastes me like a overfried chocolate cake... lol... don't klnow why!
__________________
Live Chat with Doctors 24x7 on my site http://healthcaremagic.com
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 04:33 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 780
|
Enlightenment is certainly among the fastest window managers I tried. Its speed is quite amazing for the amount of eye candy it displays. But I could never feel comfortable with its interface, and plus I dislike eye candy. Which is why I never used it seriously for a long period of time.
__________________
Hardware - Celeron 266 MHz, 128MB RAM, Intel i740 8MB RAM
Software - Slackware Linux 10.1; Archlinux 0.7; Windows 98 SE
Humanware - GS/CS C++ L+++ w b+++ DI+ D+ e
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 06:25 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,659
|
@ujjwal can you give more info on FVWM.What is it actually.
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 07:29 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 780
|
__________________
Hardware - Celeron 266 MHz, 128MB RAM, Intel i740 8MB RAM
Software - Slackware Linux 10.1; Archlinux 0.7; Windows 98 SE
Humanware - GS/CS C++ L+++ w b+++ DI+ D+ e
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 07:43 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,659
|
@ujjwal can you please guide me to install FVWM on Fedora core 3.
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 08:38 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,659
|
I downloaded the rpm package for FVWM and ICWM nut both seem so small only 1.8 and 1 Mb.Is that all the size of the desktop enviroment.
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 09:04 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 780
|
These are not desktop environments, as I said, they are window managers, that is, they provide the tools necessary for switching and controlling open windows. Desktop environments are window managers + extra tools like desktop shortcuts, common GUI utilities, applications, and some sort of a control interface for the system. But you do have small DE's like EDE
Anyway, after installing these, create a new user to test them out, create a file .xinitrc in the /home directory of the user, and place the following lines -
Code:
#!/bin/sh
exec icewm-session
Replace icewm-session with fvwm2 for fvwm. Read their manpages for more info. To get started with FVWM from scratch, read the second link I gave. For a jumpstart, check the third link, see a screenshot you like, and dowload the .fvwm2rc file along with any other icons or tools from the authors webpage, and follow the instructions present. If just a .fvwm2rc is provided, copy this to the .fvwm folder in the /home directory.
__________________
Hardware - Celeron 266 MHz, 128MB RAM, Intel i740 8MB RAM
Software - Slackware Linux 10.1; Archlinux 0.7; Windows 98 SE
Humanware - GS/CS C++ L+++ w b+++ DI+ D+ e
|
|
|
10-08-2005, 09:31 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 16
|
Anyone using GNUstep?
__________________
Kartik Mistry, gnu/linux developer
Blog: http://kartikm.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------
Debian Sarge / Ubuntu Hoary 5.04
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 06:18 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,659
|
I will let you know if it works..
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 06:44 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chennai
Posts: 1,659
|
How do I change the Gnome splash screen.I know how to do it n KDE.
@ujjwal does icwm just icewm or the filename of the rpm I installed ?
|
|
|
11-08-2005, 06:57 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Microsoft MVP
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: AskVG.com
Posts: 5,173
|
Goto:
Start ->System Tools -> More System Tools -> Configuration Editor
Then in Configuration Editor, goto:
Apps -> Gnome-sessions -> Options
In Right-pane, change location of Splash-image to the location of any image that u want to set as splash screen. (U can even set a 800x600 or 1024x768 wallpaper as splash screen).
GNome Splash screen can also be changed from "/usr/share/pixmaps/splash".
|
|
|
13-08-2005, 02:32 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ujjwal
...Blackbox...
|
Blackbox is mentioned and Fluxbox is not??? Why?
I could not choose both KDE and Fluxbox so gave my vote to the former. I stopped using Gnome when Volkerdi stopped supporting it...so its just KDE or Fluxbox for me now
|
|
|
13-08-2005, 03:17 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 780
|
It would probably have been more appropriate for me to have named fluxbox and openbox along with blackbox ... actually I like them all, but as blackbox was the original one and the first I used, so I named that. But yes, fluxbox has many new features and options that makes it the best of the three.
__________________
Hardware - Celeron 266 MHz, 128MB RAM, Intel i740 8MB RAM
Software - Slackware Linux 10.1; Archlinux 0.7; Windows 98 SE
Humanware - GS/CS C++ L+++ w b+++ DI+ D+ e
|
|
|
13-08-2005, 03:26 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 172
|
Since you are a slackware user as well...I wanted to know that do you still have Gnome? I mean after it was dropped and all...
If yes then are you using dropline or the older version that came originally with Slackware 10.1?
|
|
|
13-08-2005, 03:28 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
Commander in Chief
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,658
|
how bout changin KDE startup screen in FC4 ?
Plz tell...
__________________
Harsh J
www.harshj.com
|
|
|
13-08-2005, 03:33 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 172
|
|
|
|
13-08-2005, 03:39 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
Commander in Chief
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,658
|
Thats K but i asked specifically FC4 mr.SBA ?
In Fc4 after u logout u r directed to the FC4 default session choosin page which sux...
Plz Hlp...
__________________
Harsh J
www.harshj.com
|
|
|
13-08-2005, 03:50 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 172
|
KDE startup screen is known as splash screen for which I gave you the link but now seems to me that you are talking about Display Manager.
iirc Redhat used to use GDM as display manager so may be Fedora is using that as well. To install GDM themes, you need to run gdmsetup as root. More instructions here...
http://www.formorer.de/debblue/faq.php#faq4
|
|
|
13-08-2005, 03:57 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Commander in Chief
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,658
|
U sure thats right to use ?
coz GDM stands for Gnome Disp Manager i dont see y FC4 has that on default...
__________________
Harsh J
www.harshj.com
|
|
|
13-08-2005, 04:07 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
Broken In
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 172
|
Well it has to be some display manager...
Either it is GDM or KDM or XDM. Redhat 9 & Fedora Core 2 (that was when I stopped trying it) used to use GDM by default. If you are not sure then just launch a konsole window and type "pgrep gdm" without quotes and see if you get any output. If you do then you have GDM running else some other display manager...
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|