| Forum |
|
|||||||
| Mobiles and Tablets Topics related to mobile phones, tablets and various operating systems. News should also be posted here. Note: This NOT the place for BUYING ADVICE queries. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Call me Sumit
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,393
|
I have been using Nokia 6600 and its reception is crystal clear....I switched to Samsung C100 just for a day with my brother and I was horrified with its so horrible sound reception quality... So a question arose in my mind...which cell has clearest sound reception quality..pour in ur exps..... I think Nokia is best in this field..what do u say ? |
|
|
| Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them. | |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Wire muncher!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,164
|
you can't say that nokia or se or motorola is best in this field! it varies from phone to phone. i get excellant reception wid my k700i. used to get the same wid my t610 and also n2100. but n6600 never gave me clarity! you just can't judge a phone like this. it depends on a hell lot of factors!
never used motorola or benq phones, so can't say anthing about them.
__________________
"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." http://phoenix-ani.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
SABER RIDER
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 343
|
dude........there is nuthing like that...it depends on many factors n there will never be a clear winner....
__________________
Find out Which is The Best Video Codec?....And how to encode video the right way..!!----->>>>> http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3908 |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Broken In
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ghaziabad , India , Earth , Universe
Posts: 163
|
i think nokia phones ( even the cheapest of it's range ) had an edge in reception quality then others !!!!!!
in our lecture room which is much like a bunker sony ericsson's dies ( without signals ) and only nokia or CDMA's manages to survive !!!!!
__________________
" don't believe and respect any authority with closed eyes other then almighty !!!!! |
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 29
|
I agree 2 sanzay.not bcoz, he has said the same thing twice,but for its a fact.but there r some more points 2 mention.
in full signal strength SE has better sound reception quality than nokia.u can find this fact in earlier many digit issues. but,where the signal is comparatively low,nokia can catch better signal than SE.so,clarity will be obviously in nokia. the reason is,amongst all cellphones SE follows S.A.R. rules almost strictly,so,its less injurious 2 health.As a result its signal reception qulaity is lesser than nokia.
__________________
get in touch |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
We Both Have a Mouse!!!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: M.P.
Posts: 256
|
i have tryed all kind of mobiles Motorola, Nokia, Panasonic, Samsung etc.
i have found the best in clarity and signal catching power are- 1.Motorola 2.Nokia 3.Panasonic 4.SE but at the end it depends on the model and the peice.
__________________
C2D E6750@3.6GHz - XFX 650i Ultra - XFX 8600GT - 2x1 2GB 800MHz JetRam - CoolerMaster eXtreme Power Duo 600W - 750GB HDD - LiteOn LightScribe DVD RW - HP W1907 19" Wide... and Altec Lansing ATP3... |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|