 |
11-03-2007, 09:58 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: India
Posts: 274
|
Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
Hi Which one processor should i prefer for animation , a high intel core 2 duo or better switch to a low processor of intel's core 2 quad(LAck of money),, Thanks
__________________
!!!!*Little Knowledge Is Dangerous*!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-03-2007, 10:04 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Durgapur
Posts: 1,785
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
Its always better to buy a low end quad core processor than a high end C2D.
Cuz a high end C2D will only hav a higher clk speed and larger cache and only 2 processing cores,but a quad core with even lower clk speed will out perform cuz of its 4 processing cores.
|
|
|
11-03-2007, 01:19 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kolkata, India
Posts: 1,838
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
For animation , the more the cores , the faster it gets  ... so a quad will shine anyday  .. get a good mobo and oc that .. u should easily hit 3 GHz atleast ..
|
|
|
14-03-2007, 12:26 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pune,India
Posts: 1,445
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
^^ Yo, please specify the heat aspect about Quads too.
Consider this scenario -
Intel QX6700 @ 3.4GHz Full Load under water = 70C+ on each core.Power Draw of ONLY the CPU MIGHT be in the range of 400W
To put it bluntly, Kentsfield or Quad Core avlbl now are bloddy furnaces even though show exceptional performance.Remember that they are 2 Conroe Cores glued together,something like Smithfield,2 Prescotts glued together.
SO think about it,is it really worth spending 40-50k on it ?
|
|
|
14-03-2007, 12:40 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 372
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
Its best to avoid the current kentsfields as they are way too power hungry. Once the native quadcores arrive, they'd be a better deal as TDP will be much lower.
__________________
C2D E8400@3.8, P5N32-E SLI, 2GB Cellshock DDR2 1000(4-4-4), 8800 Ultra SLI, 2.7TB storage, CM Stacker 830, TT 1200W, Dell 2005FPW, Lots of Audio HW.
|
|
|
14-03-2007, 12:40 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pune,India
Posts: 1,445
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ch@0s
Its best to avoid the current kentsfields as they are way too power hungry. Once the native quadcores arrive, they'd be a better deal as TDP will be much lower.
|
couldnt agree more....
OT, Dada what are you doing here
|
|
|
14-03-2007, 12:42 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Welcome To The Jungle
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Living in a garbage can.
Posts: 638
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
yes go for quad core cpu they will outperform dual core.
__________________
Me n My Canon EOS 350D with EF 50mm f1.8
|
|
|
14-03-2007, 12:43 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pune,India
Posts: 1,445
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sysfilez
yes go for quad core cpu they will outperform dual core.
|
And get a heater/boiler/power guzzler free of cost
|
|
|
14-03-2007, 12:45 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cyber Hell
Posts: 1,602
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
low end quad
__________________
Behind every good computer... is a jumble of wires 'n stuff
|
|
|
14-03-2007, 12:49 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pune,India
Posts: 1,445
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tech Geek
low end quad
|
you mean Q6600 ? Even that costs friggin 800$ and is based on Kentsfield so no difference at all.
|
|
|
14-03-2007, 01:06 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 372
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by darklord
couldnt agree more....
OT, Dada what are you doing here 
|
Same thing u are doing... wasting my time talking to a wall
__________________
C2D E8400@3.8, P5N32-E SLI, 2GB Cellshock DDR2 1000(4-4-4), 8800 Ultra SLI, 2.7TB storage, CM Stacker 830, TT 1200W, Dell 2005FPW, Lots of Audio HW.
|
|
|
14-03-2007, 01:18 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Delhi
Posts: 1,466
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ch@0s
Same thing u are doing... wasting my time talking to a wall 
|
LOL  
some walls are intresting to talk to & not everyone has that ability to talk to a wall.
__________________
E6300@3.304Ghz,P5B-Dlx Wifi, 4GB Transcend DDR2 800Mhz, XFX 7600GT,Lenovo 20"Widescreen LCD, Seagate SATA2 HDD 1.5TBx2,Sony DVDRW,Creative 4.1 speakers,APC UPS 800VA,Logitech wireless mouse.
|
|
|
15-03-2007, 12:35 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Good Boy
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 330
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
well can u tell me whether core2duo or pentium d is better??????
|
|
|
15-03-2007, 12:54 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Durgapur
Posts: 1,785
|
Re: Intel Quad Processor VS Dual Core
^^^ u cant compare a C2D to a Pentium D.C2D beats the pentium D by miles.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|