Suggest me a good PC for 25 k

[dinesh_mettur]

hi dudes
am an enginnering student

i will use pc mainly for my project and surfing the net

suggest me a good and latest config
my budget is around 25k !!!

[kapsicum]

do u want to assemble or get a branded....???
what ever it may b u must have atleast following config

Intel Dual Core or Amd Athlon Xp 3200+
Intel / Asus Mobo with onboard LAN & 5.1 Channel Audio
512MB DDR1 Ram
80GB SATA HDD
DVD Combo Drive
Samsung/LG/Viewsonic 17" CRT/LCD Monitor
Logitech Keyboard+Mouse combo

this will cost u may b less than 25k

[drvarunmehta]

AthlonXP??? That got obsolete 2 years ago.

Athlon64 3000+ AM2 3.6k
Asus M2N-MX 4.3k
512 MB DDR2 RAM 3k
80GB SATA2 HDD 2.3k
Liteon DVD writer 1.9k
17" CRT 5.5k
Cabinet+Kbd+mouse 2.5k
2.1 Speakers 1.2k

Total Rs. 24,300

[NucleusKore]

Originally Posted by drvarunmehta

AthlonXP??? That got obsolete 2 years ago.

Even your 64 bit rig will be as good as obsolete if he uses a 32 bit OS.

[wizrulz]

Originally Posted by NucleusKore

Even your 64 bit rig will be as good as obsolete if he uses a 32 bit OS.

As far as budget goes..varun's config is the best and latest one .....u can get

[drvarunmehta]

Originally Posted by NucleusKore

Even your 64 bit rig will be as good as obsolete if he uses a 32 bit OS.

I didn't understand what you mean by that.

An Athlon64 is faster than an AthlonXP period. The OS used has nothing to do with it.

[Tech Geek]

A PC for 25K
http://www.techtree.com/India/Buildi...68394-556.html

[drvarunmehta]

^^That link is from Oct 2005. It's not relevant anymore.

[Tech Geek]

Oops
I didn't see the date.

[NucleusKore]

Originally Posted by drvarunmehta

I didn't understand what you mean by that.

An Athlon64 is faster than an AthlonXP period. The OS used has nothing to do with it.

It has to be faster as it came out much later in the timeline of AMD processor development. However anyone who wants to use a 32 bit OS is better of with a faster 32 bit processor than a 64 bit one. That's the point I am trying to make. f you are going to use windows xp home 32 bit on a 64 bit machine I don't see the point. However if you use a 64 bit OS, for example I use Open SuSE 10.1 on my laptop, 64 bit turion, then it makes sense. Any extra money spent on puchasing a processor for a 32 bit OS can be spent on dual cores or higher clockspeed

[Maverick069]

Core2Duo E6300 1.66Ghz @ 8900/-
Asus P5LD2-VMSE @ 4550/-
512MB DDR2 Ram @ 2250/-
Sony DRU-830A @ 2050/-
Seagate 80GB SATAII @ 2300/-
Keyboard + mouse @ 500/-
Any case + 400watts SMPS @ 1000/-
Creative Basic speakers @ 200/-
Samsung 17" CRT @ 4800/-

Total cost 26600/- which IS around 25k.

This will set you up for the future pal. All prices refer to www.deltapage.com from Chennai.

[drvarunmehta]

Originally Posted by NucleusKore

It has to be faster as it came out much later in the timeline of AMD processor development. However anyone who wants to use a 32 bit OS is better of with a faster 32 bit processor than a 64 bit one. That's the point I am trying to make. f you are going to use windows xp home 32 bit on a 64 bit machine I don't see the point. However if you use a 64 bit OS, for example I use Open SuSE 10.1 on my laptop, 64 bit turion, then it makes sense. Any extra money spent on puchasing a processor for a 32 bit OS can be spent on dual cores or higher clockspeed

A faster 32-bit proccy may be better for a 32-bit OS, but where are you going to get a 32-bit proccy?
There's no point even mentioning 32-bit or 64-bit because all proccys currently available are 64 bit and have been for almost 2 years now. It's not like you have to pay a premium for 64-bit that you should even consider 32-bit.