Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > Hardware > Hardware Q&A
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Hardware Q&A Discuss basic Hardware problems, find solutions to your hardware queries which don't fit in the other sections.


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2005, 12:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
Right Off the Assembly Line
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pune India
Posts: 6
Default How? Miracle ;)


How come my AMD Sempron 2500 64 BIT 746 Pin & 1400 MHz beats my friends 2.2GHz Celeron on Test Softwares? Our other specs ae almost identical. Gap is 800 MHz but still it outperforms HOW?

Technical reason would be appreciated Thnx
Niranjan_Naik is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 11-11-2005, 02:05 PM   #2 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Madurai
Posts: 2,349
Default

AMD uses a more optimized core that allows it to process commands much faster than Pentium processors of the same clock speed. That is why AMD uses a processor rating to allow users to identify the rough speed equivalent for the Intel processor. Your AMD Sempron 2500+ should roughly equal the performance of a 2.5 GHz Intel processor.

Arun
sakumar79 is offline  
Old 13-11-2005, 06:22 AM   #3 (permalink)
Wise Old Owl
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 1,634
Default

Nowadays, clock speed is no longer the only indicator of performace. AMD has shown that its processors consistently outperform higher clocked Pentiums. Look at the rating, which will tell you the equivalent Intel processor. Even Intel has sort of ditched the clock numbers and uses numbers such as 630 for its processors.
Nemesis is offline  
Old 13-11-2005, 01:37 PM   #4 (permalink)
Learner
 
Kniwor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,008
Default

Not all processors are made using same architecture...and even in processors with same architecture the performance depends on much more that clock speed/L2cache/L1 cache etc..

AMD uses a different architecture where the processor is configured to execute more instructions per clock cycle than intel...so it is better in that way..
AMD uses exclusive cache whereas intel use inclusive..

Let me try to explain

consider some huge number of ppl to be taken from 1 place to other...we have a ferrari and BMW...
ferrari is faster (INTEL)
but BMW will do the task more efficiently...because it can carry more ppl per round..
so now u understand why that happens...
Kniwor is offline  
Old 13-11-2005, 01:40 PM   #5 (permalink)
Learner
 
Kniwor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,008
Default

sorry for double posting.....

Have u ever wondered why 2.2 P4 is much much faster than 2.2celeron...
or why 2.2 Athlon 64 beats the **** out of 2.2 sempron (same L2 cache/socket etc...)
Kniwor is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


 
Latest Threads
- by icebags
- by ico
- by trublu

Advertisement




All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2