 |
14-12-2004, 05:30 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
t3h g04t
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AnKH Morpork/Tsort
Posts: 476
|
GeForce 6200
What do you ppl think abt the latest entry level offering in the graphics card market?
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
14-12-2004, 08:21 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
King of my own Castle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Humor and wit.
Posts: 1,249
|
Nothing but another 5200Fx with updated softwares in the offering ......
__________________
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
|
|
|
15-12-2004, 11:32 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 53
|
I disagree. 6200 is a great chip and is generations ahead of 5200FX.
|
|
|
15-12-2004, 12:49 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Satishsays.com
Posts: 349
|
Its Diffenrent
Its different dude. Go out and buy it will you? NVidia are not exactly NVidiots you know.
__________________
SatishSays.com
twitter.com/satishsays
|
|
|
15-12-2004, 08:02 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: India
Posts: 1,103
|
No comments as of now but keenly interested in the performance of the Geforce 6200TC the one that address system memory instead of onboard video ram. ATI has a similar technology in the pipeline hyper memory which shud b interesting as well.
__________________
www.techenclave.com Ecumenical Technology !:)
|
|
|
17-12-2004, 07:18 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 30
|
Just wanted to ask...is there much difference in 5600, 5700 6200 etc..
Like they have 256 mb of memory each, so only the bandwidth might be differing...
But the cost differences among these are huge!
|
|
|
17-12-2004, 09:45 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 31
|
it does make a lot of difference....
the chipsets are all different in these cards....higher end chipsets allow higher core and memory clock speeds (as in frequencies) which is wat matters...higher freqs give u better performance....
infact u might sumtimes find tht cards with lesser RAM( say 64 MB to 128 MB) perform better than those with higher amounts(say 128 MB or 256 MB) even though they miht belong to the same chipset.....
|
|
|
18-12-2004, 04:48 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: kolkata
Posts: 255
|
Dude , 5700 makes a lot of diff , you cant compare 5700 ulta with 5600 or 6200 , its supposed to be faster than radeon 9800 with 256mb GDDR3 memory and 256 bit wide bus , please do not include 5700 LE , its not even official by NVIDIA .
__________________
AMD64 2800+ 1GB ECC DDR 400 ,MSI K8T800 Asus Geforce FX 5200 128 MB, 120 GB Barracuda,16X DVD RW,Samsung 16x DVD,Samsung Wireless ,Creative AUDIGY2 ZS 7.1 with Creative Inspire 7.1/1800+AXP 512MB ECC DDR400 .40GB BLACK
|
|
|
18-12-2004, 12:40 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 240
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by indro
Dude , 5700 makes a lot of diff , you cant compare 5700 ulta with 5600 or 6200 , its supposed to be faster than radeon 9800 with 256mb GDDR3 memory and 256 bit wide bus , please do not include 5700 LE , its not even official by NVIDIA .
|
hmm...no offence to u man..but can i see some benchmarks whihc prove that geforce 5700 ultra is faster than the radeon 9800..and what is the approximate cost of geforce 5700 ultra?
|
|
|
18-12-2004, 01:47 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,208
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by indro
Dude , 5700 makes a lot of diff , you cant compare 5700 ulta with 5600 or 6200 , its supposed to be faster than radeon 9800 with 256mb GDDR3 memory and 256 bit wide bus , please do not include 5700 LE , its not even official by NVIDIA .
|
lol....ur kidding right....the 9800 beats the 5700 series in all benchies. And esp the 9800 Pro. Its been universally acknowledged that the 5series from Nvidia was a dismal failure. The 9800 will cream the 5700 simply because it has twice the rendering pipelines (8 up from 4) and double the memory bus width (256bit up from 128bit).If ur still not sure here are some links :
Review 9800 XT vs 5950 Ultra ( http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews/xt59/)
Review 9800 vs 5900 Ultra ( http://www.digital-daily.com/video/f...radeon9800pro/)
Review 9600 XT vs 5700 Ultra ( http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Ha...00xt_vs_5700U/)
__________________
AMD 64 3500+ Venice
DFI Lan Party Ultra-D
2* 512 MB PdP Memory with 2-2-5L timings
XFX 7900GT 256 MB Card
|
|
|
18-12-2004, 03:44 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: India
Posts: 1,103
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by indro
Dude , 5700 makes a lot of diff , you cant compare 5700 ulta with 5600 or 6200 , its supposed to be faster than radeon 9800 with 256mb GDDR3 memory and 256 bit wide bus , please do not include 5700 LE , its not even official by NVIDIA .
|
Indro dude thats a irresponsible statement without any proof to back it up whatever (its worth a laugh, but thats a different thing altogether). Also 9800 was never equipped with GDDR3 mem, GDDR3 memory is being on newre cards like x800 and 6800 series.
__________________
www.techenclave.com Ecumenical Technology !:)
|
|
|
18-12-2004, 07:48 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: kolkata
Posts: 255
|
BTW i was talking about radeon 9800 non pro , and GDDR3 256 bit memory bus is for 5700 not 9800 , uhmmm thanks for your replies though ,makes the topic more interesting ,
a URL for you ,its a linux benchie though ,
http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2302
I would like both good and critical comments
thanks
__________________
AMD64 2800+ 1GB ECC DDR 400 ,MSI K8T800 Asus Geforce FX 5200 128 MB, 120 GB Barracuda,16X DVD RW,Samsung 16x DVD,Samsung Wireless ,Creative AUDIGY2 ZS 7.1 with Creative Inspire 7.1/1800+AXP 512MB ECC DDR400 .40GB BLACK
|
|
|
18-12-2004, 08:17 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
King of my own Castle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Humor and wit.
Posts: 1,249
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by indro
BTW i was talking about radeon 9800 non pro , and GDDR3 256 bit memory bus is for 5700 not 9800 , uhmmm thanks for your replies though ,makes the topic more interesting ,
a URL for you ,its a linux benchie though ,
http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2302
I would like both good and critical comments
thanks
|
Still i would beg to differ. The results are not due Ati Radeon 9800 non pro being Inferior to 5700 nvidia. But rather Nvidia linux drivers are lot better than ATI ones. Still Talking about gamer, 99.9 are windows users.
And who to talk about but stupid me who is still Stuck with this Gigabyte Nvidia 5700 Ultra. Anyway if you can arrange me 9800 whatever i had readily exchange it.
__________________
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
|
|
|
22-12-2004, 03:37 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
t3h g04t
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AnKH Morpork/Tsort
Posts: 476
|
I've seen some benchmarks that put the 6200 near x600 in performance, thats why I asked, newayz the shader performance is gud
|
|
|
22-12-2004, 03:47 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 246
|
checkout the 6200 review at www.guru3d.com
Its a good card for the price.
Performs similar to 9600XT. Its a very good deal for guys looking for cheap but still deascent card.
But dont expect to game with all details turned up and AA and AF turned on.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|