^ don't be a moron. Natal was copied from eyetoy
and.. talking about copying.. wii copied Dualshocks.. what about that.. and Nintendo copied the whole idea of console from Atari. Now... is this a rational point? I think no.
The industry is a inspirational thingy. Takes best from one.. gives it in a new way.
Now.. any thing that has motion control and can be held with a single hand will be a snip off from wii motion controller? that's very irrational. I would say every one copied atari's joystick. because.. every controller will be a hand held one and has buttons on it.
And that 70M.. i will give credit to Mr. Mario and Miss. Zelda.
Sorry for going off the topic..
Now.. my concern with Natal is
1. what to hold as a steering if i am playing a Racing game.. am i supposed keep my hands up for 30 mins.. that would be like a punishment to 2nd grader. And.. same thing with FPS games.. you have to hold something to purely play.
2. it will consume nearly 25% of xbox system resources.. as all the developers are hitting 90% mark in system resources.. they have to downgrade the game to reduce the load from CPU. and they will end up giving bland AI, poor physics, etc.
on the contrast.. the natal is really going to be a great thing for arcade style games. And for those who wants to really get involved into the game.
when it comes to Ps Move..
1. difficult to play FPS games
2. As it is based on gestures.. gestures has to be done perfectly.. else, you will end up getting a different result.
the advantages of PS movie is.. High precession tracing by PS Eye. i mean.. it can not only detect the x,y,z movement.. but even the exact rotation of the controller.