|
View Poll Results: "Preferred Member" status for members who have contributed a lot to the forum:
|
|
Yes, that would encourage these members to contribute more to the forum
|
  
|
5 |
16.67% |
|
No, no need to differentiate between members.
|
  
|
17 |
56.67% |
|
I really dont care
|
  
|
8 |
26.67% |
 |
23-07-2008, 01:07 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Alpha Geek
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Calcutta
Posts: 732
|
Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Hi all I'am not sure if this question came up earlier or not but nevertheless I'll ask it anyway. I was thinking that there are lots of members in Thinkdigit who are not only active in the forum for a long time but they also continue contribute a lot to the forum which makes Digit seperate from other tech forums in India. I know that Digit has done away with the reputation thing a long time away. Hence today there is no way to recognise & probably reward the a member who contributes a lot lot more to the forum than merely just increasing his/her own post count. The reason for posting this thread is because I was speaking to one such highly active & contributing member & that's when I felt that these people were not looking forward to becoming a Moderator instead they would rather be very happy to enjoy a "Preferred Member" status where they would get more priviledges than a normal member...and say that their username/title would be of a different color like that in the case of a Mod or an Admin  .
To throw some more light one this topic I would like to take the example of members like Choto Cheeta , Vishal Gupta , aryayush and many more members like them deserve to be recognised and be rewarded "Preferred Member" status IMHO.
__________________
C2D E6600,Asus P5N32 e SLI,1GB 667mhz,Samsung 940BW,Zeb 8600GT,Seagate 250GB sata II,16x Sony(OEM) dvd RW,Zeb Anitibiotic & Platinum 500W,Microsoft desktop pro 700,bluetooth,Logitech MX Revolution
Last edited by sabret00the; 23-07-2008 at 01:19 PM.
|
|
|
|
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
24-07-2008, 03:55 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Skyscraper Terrace
Posts: 2
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
oh..ya..if u do so..then u shud not call this place as forum. You can call it a bank or club. Then u can hve titles like preferred members, premier members, etc.
|
|
|
26-07-2008, 08:22 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Owner
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 730
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
+1 with ranger and if the mods find out, you wold also be RANKED!
ps.Digit forum is for ppl 2 interact not gain rep. also members like VishalG GigaCore Hullap etc... are well known with us, which you already know... n00bs don't need it coz if they know it there will be a lot of pms for our fellow digitians.
__________________
Read Rules > FAQs > Stickies before posting a new thread. PM me anytime for an issue, and I'll be idle on irc too.
My dream rig.
ლ(ಠ_ಠ)ლ Webchat for Digit.
|
|
|
26-07-2008, 09:29 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Human Spambot
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Aamchi Mumbai !!!
Posts: 4,228
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
^^ Agree with the above two posters.
All members ahould be treated equally.
No wars, no negative reps. This all will lead to forum disintegration.
__________________
ShutterTux - Photography, Linux & Life! : http://shuttertux.wordpress.com
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 12:54 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
King of my own Castle
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Humor and wit.
Posts: 1,249
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Agreed completely .
There should be no separate preference between member whether they are old or contributing to the posts.
All Members are equal scape goats of mods and Admins.
Moreever this forum is not democratic agenda.
All should be vulnerable to the powerful mods and admins and rules.
__________________
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 01:10 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Human Spambot
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bombay, India
Posts: 5,202
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
There used to be something called 'Trusted Member' title or something like that which I recall.I guess it's been taken off for a long time now.
__________________
"Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy, and ideas are bulletproof. "
V for Vendetta
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 01:43 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Laptoping
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Yeah allwyn, back in the phpBB days - we had these user tites like Brainiac and Trusted Members with special badges just above their avatar.
__________________
You could think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to stop thinking.
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 02:28 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 8,936
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
I really don't care because I'm just here to help in the best possible way.......I don't want anything or any sort of title in return.......
And yes, it may also develop a sense of inferiority among normal users as they might think that they're being termed up as 'unpreferred' members and they may start spamming to become 'preferred'.......
__________________
.
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 08:02 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
In The Zone
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 227
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Honestly most of the people already recognize the mentioned members as people who've contributed a lot to the forum.
__________________
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 08:46 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
"Aal Izz Well"
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Inside ur BRaIN..!!
Posts: 1,832
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Yes there must be anything like that.
__________________
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=krow
http://twitter.com/krazzywarrior
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 11:39 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
The Devil's Advocate
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Masti Ki Paathshaala
Posts: 7,019
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
I don't think this is required. For one, who decides who gets the status? Getting the status will lead to another big war on the forum, with people asking and nominating their own preferences and then they will start complaint threads alleging bias. More over, people like Aayush, Vishal, Choto DO NOT need any recognition here. Their work is well known to people in the tech circles & any more recognition that you intend to bestow upon them will be like the worthless political ceremonies that happen. The rest is Raaabo's choice as this is not a democratic forum.
__________________
"The problem that shows up with the three red lights on the console is a complex interaction with some very complex parts.” - Robbie Bach
http://beingmanan.com
twitter: manan | Last.FM: manan
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 11:47 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
MMO Addict
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,474
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
So, can I get to be a "preferred member"? >.<
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 11:49 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: delhi
Posts: 1,429
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Here 
I R "Preferred Member"
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 11:53 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Who stole my Alpaca!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kerala
Posts: 2,020
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Quote:
|
So, can I get to be a "preferred member"? >.<
|
DENIED!  .
Seriously this tag thing is kind of old school. People who contribute would contribute anyway with or without the tags. You don't get up int he morning and say "WOOOHOOOOO I got to post on the Forum today since I'm a Preferred Member." Its more like "Hmmmm I think someone on the forum would be interested in this piece of information and then you post it anyway.
Further as someone already said , putting up the preferred Member would probably bring up a trend of people posting spam just to get a tag.
__________________
The Ultimate Chess Strategy : "Hit Hard, Hit Fast and Hit Often"
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 02:41 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Web developer
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Paradise
Posts: 1,010
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Guys like Ani, Choto & Vishal should be given a title like honoured members. That's the least the forum administrators can do to appreciate their contribution to the forum.
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 02:52 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
The Devil's Advocate
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Masti Ki Paathshaala
Posts: 7,019
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by narangz
Guys like Ani, Choto & Vishal should be given a title like honoured members.
|
Usko Uncle ka title diya hai na. Usse bada kya ho sakta hai.
__________________
"The problem that shows up with the three red lights on the console is a complex interaction with some very complex parts.” - Robbie Bach
http://beingmanan.com
twitter: manan | Last.FM: manan
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 03:48 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
BSD init pwns System V
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: atapi.sys as Stuxnet
Posts: 1,229
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
^+1
|
|
|
27-07-2008, 09:47 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Web developer
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Paradise
Posts: 1,010
|
Re: Should there be a title called "Preferred Members"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by iMav
Usko Uncle ka title diya hai na. Usse bada kya ho sakta hai.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|