Forum     

Go Back   Digit Technology Discussion Forum > Bandwidth Wastage > Fight Club
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Fight Club The Debate Zone. Sensitive and controversial topics will be discussed here — only the thick-skinned should enter


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-12-2008, 11:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
Democracy is a myth
 
rhitwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kaikhali,Kolkata
Posts: 2,158
Lightbulb Measuring a THREAD standard


Guys, for the last few days frequency of locking threads are increasing. That denotes (by general logic) that most of us are creating useless thread.
Now some senior members are opposing this logic driven conclusion and protesting this act. Again MODs are not agreeing with them and this is getting into a clash.

Come on guys, this is our forum everyone here has the same responsibility to behave accordingly and keeping the forum clean. Just because YOU have created some thread it has to be right and appropriate is an INSANE logic. MODs are not against us, sometimes they just have to act tough. They are one of us and may be having a bit more control in their "UserCP".

So, I propose all you members to come forward and put in your own words what should be standard of threads which abides by all the rules of this forum. So that the task of MODs becomes easy and less controversial. Lets concentrate on "ChitChat" section for the time being.


I propose:-
1. make every thread in ChitChat with a Poll (Ho-Hum, Insane and No-Comments). If the vote percentage of "Insane" is more than 70%, MODs CAN (I say can, not must) lock the thread. Exception only for Admins, they can Lock/Delete any thread they wish. (this is a very boring and time consuming matter, but to be in safe-side at least this can be done. Newbies have to be notified of this but, we who are long-timesr can follow this)

2. After locking any thread a reason have to be given. EXPLANATIONs are MUST.


(Aur kuch nahi a raha hai dimag mein, looking for ur views)
__________________
"My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right."

"I'm never wrong. Once I thought I was wrong, but I was wrong"
rhitwick is offline  
Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them.
Advertisement

Old 24-12-2008, 02:10 PM   #2 (permalink)
Overlord v2.0
 
alexanderthegreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ICA Headquarters
Posts: 369
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Nice idea, I disagree! and I'm not even gonna read those 2 rules with ya! Tee hee hee

Reply to Point 1:>You mean democracy? Won't work here! On TDF, people are insane more often than not. So, very few people will vote for what is right. A living example is our own country and the corruption it faces! Just yesterday, for example, rohan went completely berserk and posted that Swaraj... I mean "Spamming is my birthright..." thread. Even you joined in didn't you rhitwick?(No offence intended)

Reply to Point 2:>Another fine point! Its just that mods ALREADY DO THAT HERE!

I've got a better idea: Somehow, anyhow, keep chucking the forum rules page in the face of every member every now and then till they've got it memorized?

And I disagree with your conclusion that mods are tough here! The mods here are the most lenient ones I've ever seen anywhere! It's just that they're not stupid, you know!

A message to the mods if they read this: Keep up the good work, people! You people have got supporters amongst the crowd of fuming people! Attaboy!
__________________
The Only quote worth quoting: "E Loboa!!! What man???
Forum Rules:http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/announcement.php?f=16&a=1

Disclaimer:No offence meant to ANYONE!

Last edited by alexanderthegreat; 24-12-2008 at 02:32 PM.
alexanderthegreat is offline  
Old 24-12-2008, 02:29 PM   #3 (permalink)
Human Spambot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lat 28.38°N , Longt 77.13°E
Posts: 2,431
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Another thread which might be closed soon
ThinkFree is offline  
Old 24-12-2008, 02:37 PM   #4 (permalink)
Democracy is a myth
 
rhitwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kaikhali,Kolkata
Posts: 2,158
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexanderthegreat View Post
Nice idea, I disagree! and I'm not even gonna read those 2 rules with ya! Tee hee hee
Chalo, at least u read what I've wrote. Thats enough for me. And disagreeing of u is welcome, thats d reason its in FightClub.

Quote:
Reply to Point 1:>You mean democracy? Won't work here! On TDF, people are insane more often than not. So, very few people will vote for what is right. A living example is our own country and the corruption it faces! Just yesterday, for example, rohan went completely berserk and posted that Swaraj... I mean "Spamming is my birthright..." thread. Even you joined in didn't you rhitwick?(No offence intended)
Agreed I joined, but read my posts, First-Nothing, 2nd-requested Mods to merge it with Offtopic Thread and 3rd-Bhul Gaya

Quote:
Reply to Point 2:>Another fine point! Its just that mods ALREADY DO THAT HERE!
Not Always, I can still show number of threads being closed without any explanation given.

Quote:
I've got a better idea: Somehow, anyhow, keep chucking the forum rules page in the face of every member every now and then till they've got it memorized?
Is this good idea, how would u like it. Like in every refresh U get a pop-up, 90% people would use a pop-up blocker.

Quote:
And I disagree with your conclusion that mods are tough here! The mods here are the most lenient ones I've ever seen anywhere! It's just that they're not stupid, you know!

A message to the mods if they read this: Keep up the good work, people! You people have got supporters amongst the crowd of fuming people!
Read again, I said "sometimes they have act tough". And I also appreciate MODs efforts thats why I've opened this thread. If not, like general trend I would also started bashing ur superior.
__________________
"My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right."

"I'm never wrong. Once I thought I was wrong, but I was wrong"
rhitwick is offline  
Old 24-12-2008, 02:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
AFK
 
thewisecrab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bombay
Posts: 1,599
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

There is the "Rate the thread" option already available on this forum. (it's overlooked by many )
But I guess that option has become a bit outdated.
__________________
Follow me on http://twitter.com/thewisecrab

"This Jen, is the internet"
thewisecrab is offline  
Old 24-12-2008, 03:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
Wahahaha~!
 
Faun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pune/there
Posts: 7,673
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Do one thing, close the thread older than 1 year. Let them be for viewing only. A simple sql query will do that if there is no option in vBulletin.

But don't close a currently opened thread in Chit Chat unless it becomes stale(after 2-3 days if it doesn't get buried itself) and you thought it was another spam kinda thread made by genuine members.

Chit Chat section is meant for some fun.
__________________
Blog | Flickr | Battlelog
Spoiler:
Asus Z68 V-Pro|i5 2500k|TRUE Black|Ripjaws X|U2311H|N560GTX|D7000|XONAR STX|RE272|RE0|CC51|XE200PRO Walnut| TD II V2| Ultraphile|N5800

Mono
Faun is offline  
Old 24-12-2008, 03:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
King of my own Castle
 
freshseasons's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Humor and wit.
Posts: 1,249
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by T159 View Post

Chit Chat section is meant for some fun.
Try getting that in some of the people's head here and you will suddenly find world against you.
__________________
Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
freshseasons is offline  
Old 24-12-2008, 04:02 PM   #8 (permalink)
Boom Boom Boom
 
cooldudie3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MACHEAVEN
Posts: 741
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

It is true that the chit chat section is for fun. But if it's something inappropriate it should be closed but with reason on the thread.
__________________
I'm back! Gimme a hugggggg... :D
cooldudie3 is offline  
Old 24-12-2008, 04:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
Overlord v2.0
 
alexanderthegreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ICA Headquarters
Posts: 369
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

The Chit Chat section is meant for some fun, but not for spamming or for posting the same things a million times or posting inappropriate, objectionable content or for the use of unparliamentary language or for nonsense topics such as discussions on no. and degree of friendship bonds with "the other kind"(If you get my drift). Some people post entirely idiotic topics such as "What's for Breakfast?" which don't at all require any discussion on this forum! Fun is ok but destruction-causing-indisciplined-mad-maniacal-mayhem is not!

People need to learn the netiquettes by heart!
Speaking of which, I think posts using the modern SMS "lingo" should be deleted too! ax3 may be exempted as that's his identity!!!

@rhitwick: I wasn't implying the use of popups... OK, you caught me, I was!. There are other ways. The admins can include a box that displays the forum rules one at a time like a "Tip of the Day" box. Now that's an idea!
__________________
The Only quote worth quoting: "E Loboa!!! What man???
Forum Rules:http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/announcement.php?f=16&a=1

Disclaimer:No offence meant to ANYONE!

Last edited by alexanderthegreat; 24-12-2008 at 04:34 PM.
alexanderthegreat is offline  
Old 24-12-2008, 04:46 PM   #10 (permalink)
Democracy is a myth
 
rhitwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kaikhali,Kolkata
Posts: 2,158
Thumbs up Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by thewisecrab View Post
There is the "Rate the thread" option already available on this forum. (it's overlooked by many )
But I guess that option has become a bit outdated.
This can be handy...a very much forgotten tool, which can be usefull for this.

And I agree with Alexander that, just because its a "ChitChat" people do anything and everything.
But on the other hand, look how we (they) are dependent on it; we share our happiness (marriage, new born babies, new love , old love etc), sadness (jobless, suicide, heartbreak, lost love etc), personality (which brand shirt, trouser, shoe, innerware, breakfast, lunch, type of chapati, favourite food etc). Mainly everything. People do this with their partners, friends, families; now our forum has been chosen as the one to act.
These guys (me too) actually believe my co-members in all those matters. Ask opinion, share experiences etc.


Now, all these can be useful for some and seem to be crap for some. Thats why I asked one yardstick to measure those threads.
If everybody tells those are not useful, lock them else keep them going.
__________________
"My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right."

"I'm never wrong. Once I thought I was wrong, but I was wrong"
rhitwick is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 12:37 AM   #11 (permalink)
The Thread Killer >:)
 
phreak0ut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,185
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Around 2 weeks back or so, i could see lot of TP and BS threads in the chit-chat section. Yes, chit-chat section is for fun, but like alexander has pointed out, there is no need to create a thread for every silly reason. I've mentioned before and I would like to mention again. Threads in the Random News section needs to be pruned after 3 months atleast. For chit-chat, the really crappy threads need to be deleted and the old ones need to be locked. *ahem*I see one mod being click-happy when it comes to closing threads.*ahem* I hope you guys know who it is
__________________
Want to make this world a better place? Then, start seeding and don't be just a leecher :)
phreak0ut is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 12:42 AM   #12 (permalink)
The Devil's Advocate
 
iMav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Masti Ki Paathshaala
Posts: 7,019
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by T159 View Post
Do one thing, close the thread older than 1 year. Let them be for viewing only. A simple sql query will do that if there is no option in vBulletin.

But don't close a currently opened thread in Chit Chat unless it becomes stale(after 2-3 days if it doesn't get buried itself) and you thought it was another spam kinda thread made by genuine members.

Chit Chat section is meant for some fun.
OMG! Your post has more than 3 words :O And no 'lol' :O

//Sorry for the off-topic post.
__________________
"The problem that shows up with the three red lights on the console is a complex interaction with some very complex parts.” - Robbie Bach

http://beingmanan.com
twitter: manan | Last.FM: manan
iMav is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 12:45 AM   #13 (permalink)
Wise Old Mouse
 
mrintech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bhopal, India
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by iMav View Post
OMG! Your post has more than 3 words :O And no 'lol' :O

//Sorry for the off-topic post.


I was thinking the Same thing.

Quote:
^^lol
__________________
- MrinTech :)
mrintech is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 01:32 AM   #14 (permalink)
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
 
kalpik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,432
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Hmm.. I appreciate that we are discussing this in an "adult" manner, and not by opening a stupid aimless thread just to go "nazi" on the MODs. Since we are discussing this, ill be totally honest with my opinion on this.

1. Democracy does not work here. I mean look at India itself. Do you really think democracy is doing us any good? I mean you'll get people voting for useless stuff, just to "oppose" some other people, including the MODs. I admit we also make mistakes sometimes, we are also people afterall! But we dont stand back to apologise if we realise its our fault! We just want you to trust us with our decisions!

2. We make sure to give a reason every time we lock a thread. The only cases where reason is not given is when A: Someone else gave the reason already (and its pretty clear, like bumping an old thread) or B: If the reason for closing the thread is very very obvious. Still, if anyone wants any explanation about a locked thread, they are free to PM us. I myself have responded to such requests in the past!

P.S. Thanks to all of you who appreciate what we do. Most people dont understand the time and effort that goes into moderation.
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain

Last edited by kalpik; 25-12-2008 at 01:49 AM.
kalpik is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 02:39 AM   #15 (permalink)
Democracy is a myth
 
rhitwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kaikhali,Kolkata
Posts: 2,158
Thumbs up Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalpik View Post
Hmm.. I appreciate that we are discussing this in an "adult" manner, and not by opening a stupid aimless thread just to go "nazi" on the MODs. Since we are discussing this, ill be totally honest with my opinion on this.
And I appreciate u of replying here, at least one of "U" who we are talking about cared to reply.
Quote:
1. Democracy does not work here. I mean look at India itself. Do you really think democracy is doing us any good? I mean you'll get people voting for useless stuff, just to "oppose" some other people, including the MODs. I admit we also make mistakes sometimes, we are also people afterall! But we dont stand back to apologise if we realize its our fault! We just want you to trust us with our decisions!
Alexander also told same, do u also believe same. Just because its not there, it doesn't mean it can't be. Ok, my idea of adding a poll was stupid, but as thewisecrab told, we can use "rate the thread" utility. Its already there, nothing new. After a certain (1week at max) u just check what is its status and del/lock or leave it.

Quote:
2. We make sure to give a reason every time we lock a thread. The only cases where reason is not given is when A: Someone else gave the reason already (and its pretty clear, like bumping an old thread) or B: If the reason for closing the thread is very very obvious. Still, if anyone wants any explanation about a locked thread, they are free to PM us. I myself have responded to such requests in the past!
Kalpik, sorry mate but I've to tell it. Don't take it personally its to all ur mod community. (Sorry, U only replied here and I'm bashing u)
Why do we have to PM u? Why? If u r locking a thread u r liable to provide reasons. Let all of us know what is the reason behind that.

Quote:
P.S. Thanks to all of you who appreciate what we do. Most people dont understand the time and effort that goes into moderation.
Seriously, again I thank u for ur reply and d responsibility u hold. But, as a lot of people are raising questions I guess u all should do an internal meeting about it.
__________________
"My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right."

"I'm never wrong. Once I thought I was wrong, but I was wrong"

Last edited by kalpik; 25-12-2008 at 09:36 AM.
rhitwick is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 09:05 AM   #16 (permalink)
Overlord v2.0
 
alexanderthegreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ICA Headquarters
Posts: 369
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

kalpik, did you read this:-
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexanderthegreat View Post
@rhitwick: I wasn't implying the use of popups... OK, you caught me, I was!. There are other ways. The admins can include a box that displays the forum rules one at a time like a "Tip of the Day" box. Now that's an idea!
Well? How about inducing some set of rules like a set of subliminal messages? Or using a "Rule of the day" box.

Also, I'm not a mod, but I've got a reply for you rhitwick:-
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhitwick View Post
Kalpik, sorry mate but I've to tell it. Don't take it personally its to all ur mod community. (Sorry, U only replied here and I'm bashing u)
Why do we have to PM u? Why? If u r locking a thread u r liable to provide reasons. Let all of us know what is the reason behind that.
Because they have to conserve bandwidth! Just because TDF has got nice servers doesn't mean they've got unlimited storage capacities! Even a block of formatted text does matter! See? If you don't, go to the SKOAR! forums to find out the value of bandwidth.

Also, sometimes, stating reasons may result in the damage to the ego or prestige for a certain forum member! Think of it! The mods found someone who had been... suppose... posting rude content... very objectionable content... if the mods think he does not deserve to be given a second chance, they will lock or delete his thread and ban him! Now, they won't want the world to know what a huge prat he's been, so, they don't post a reason and edit out all objectionable content. It just like the police arresting a criminal and covering his face with a piece of cloth and dispersing the croud. Official reasons will be given to the Trial Court. So the mods actually care for our prestige(Or so is my theory, I thought I heard "We do? Oh, I mean, yeah we do!")

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhitwick View Post
Alexander also told same, do u also believe same. Just because its not there, it doesn't mean it can't be. Ok, my idea of adding a poll was stupid, but as thewisecrab told, we can use "rate the thread" utility. Its already there, nothing new. After a certain (1week at max) u just check what is its status and del/lock or leave it.
Allow me to be blunt!. Do you realize that you're asking for the power of moderation? Now before you point out the word "may" (Yes, I read carefully!), I'd like to point out the fact that if a thread had... say, Excellent rating due to some like minded abovesaid (Post #9) kind of people, AND the mods lock it, they will face flame no matter what. Criticism will always be there. Look at kalpiks's signature, it states the same!

Conversely, a nice thread may be voted down and mods may mistakingly lock it!(You were against that Forum game of mine! ). I may seem utterly confused! Feel free to ask me to explain.

P.S.: Please pardon the excessive use of Exclamation marks(!). Oh, and I love the Fight Club section! So many disagreements!
__________________
The Only quote worth quoting: "E Loboa!!! What man???
Forum Rules:http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/announcement.php?f=16&a=1

Disclaimer:No offence meant to ANYONE!

Last edited by alexanderthegreat; 25-12-2008 at 09:24 AM.
alexanderthegreat is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 09:29 AM   #17 (permalink)
Wahahaha~!
 
Faun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pune/there
Posts: 7,673
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by iMav View Post
OMG! Your post has more than 3 words :O And no 'lol' :O

//Sorry for the off-topic post.
this iz serious...lol

I saved time just in case my net connection disrupts

Close the thread if more than two guys report about it. And if everyone is happy replying (mrintech is an exclusion...lol...hand him to maoists) then atleast let the thread run for 2-3 days and sink to the bottom by itself or close it manually by 4th day if mods suspect it to be buried deep.

Same thing I repeated agani. It is not difficult and a viable solution if not fool proof.
__________________
Blog | Flickr | Battlelog
Spoiler:
Asus Z68 V-Pro|i5 2500k|TRUE Black|Ripjaws X|U2311H|N560GTX|D7000|XONAR STX|RE272|RE0|CC51|XE200PRO Walnut| TD II V2| Ultraphile|N5800

Mono

Last edited by Faun; 25-12-2008 at 09:35 AM.
Faun is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 09:37 AM   #18 (permalink)
In Pursuit of "Happyness"
 
kalpik's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 3,432
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhitwick View Post
And I appreciate u of replying here, at least one of "U" who we are talking about cared to reply.
Alexander also told same, do u also believe same. Just because its not there, it doesn't mean it can't be. Ok, my idea of adding a poll was stupid, but as thewisecrab told, we can use "rate the thread" utility. Its already there, nothing new. After a certain (1week at max) u just check what is its status and del/lock or leave it.
You mean to say that we should let all threads run for one week before closing them? That's insane! Plus the point of bogus votes still remains!

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhitwick View Post
Kalpik, sorry mate but I've to tell it. Don't take it personally its to all ur mod community. (Sorry, U only replied here and I'm bashing u)
Why do we have to PM u? Why? If u r locking a thread u r liable to provide reasons. Let all of us know what is the reason behind that.
Well, alexander gave you one reason, the other reason, to be very honest, is that sometimes we just dont have the time! You should understand that there are a LOT of reported posts and sometimes there's no other MOD around! And you have to take quick action!

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhitwick View Post
Seriously, again I thank u for ur reply and d responsibility u hold. But, as a lot of people are raising questions I guess u all should do an internal meeting about it.
Whenever it is a matter that anyone of us is not clear about, we always open up a thread regarding that in the MOD section, you can be sure of that

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexanderthegreat View Post
kalpik, did you read this:-
Well? How about inducing some set of rules like a set of subliminal messages? Or using a "Rule of the day" box.
Well, to be honest, that would be a lot irritating. And would spoil the experience Anyhow, doing something like that is not in our hands. Only the admins can do that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by T159 View Post
Close the thread if more than two guys report about it. And if everyone is happy replying (mrintech is an exclusion...lol...hand him to maoists) then atleast let the thread run for 2-3 days and sink to the bottom by itself or close it manually by 4th day if mods suspect it to be buried deep.
Yes believe me. We DO wait for a thread to get reported if its a dicey thread. That rohan thread was reported by the way, just in case you are thinking i closed it on my whim. I had to wait for a report as i had not expected an old and helpful member of the community to behave in that manner. In the past also we have taken some bold steps if even an old member behaved that way. You should understand that we have to put our foot down somewhere!
__________________
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain

Last edited by kalpik; 25-12-2008 at 09:43 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
kalpik is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 01:29 PM   #19 (permalink)
Democracy is a myth
 
rhitwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Kaikhali,Kolkata
Posts: 2,158
Cool Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexanderthegreat View Post
Also, I'm not a mod, but I've got a reply for you rhitwick:-

Because they have to conserve bandwidth! Just because TDF has got nice servers doesn't mean they've got unlimited storage capacities! Even a block of formatted text does matter! See? If you don't, go to the SKOAR! forums to find out the value of bandwidth.
I was very much ill-informed about it.

Quote:
Also, sometimes, stating reasons may result in the damage to the ego or prestige for a certain forum member! Think of it! The mods found someone who had been... suppose... posting rude content... very objectionable content... if the mods think he does not deserve to be given a second chance, they will lock or delete his thread and ban him! Now, they won't want the world to know what a huge prat he's been, so, they don't post a reason and edit out all objectionable content. It just like the police arresting a criminal and covering his face with a piece of cloth and dispersing the croud. Official reasons will be given to the Trial Court. So the mods actually care for our prestige(Or so is my theory, I thought I heard "We do? Oh, I mean, yeah we do!")



Allow me to be blunt!. Do you realize that you're asking for the power of moderation?
No, I'm not. Not everything looks good from top. People stat taking u on face-value. I'm very much happy on the ground level.
Quote:
Now before you point out the word "may" (Yes, I read carefully!), I'd like to point out the fact that if a thread had... say, Excellent rating due to some like minded abovesaid (Post #9) kind of people, AND the mods lock it, they will face flame no matter what. Criticism will always be there. Look at kalpiks's signature, it states the same!

Conversely, a nice thread may be voted down and mods may mistakingly lock it!(You were against that Forum game of mine! ). I may seem utterly confused! Feel free to ask me to explain.

P.S.: Please pardon the excessive use of Exclamation marks(!). Oh, and I love the Fight Club section! So many disagreements!
Alexander, reading ur thread it seems that there is no solution. Is it? Is there really no solution? Why can't we talk and agree upon something which all of us will obey. There has to be some way. I still have hope. Something, anything?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kalpik View Post
You mean to say that we should let all threads run for one week before closing them? That's insane! Plus the point of bogus votes still remains!
But u've agreed that u guys actually wait till someone reports the thread. And I believe everyone should be given a chance. Ok Not 1 week may be 2-3 days max.
Quote:
Yes believe me. We DO wait for a thread to get reported if its a dicey thread. That rohan thread was reported by the way, just in case you are thinking i closed it on my whim. I had to wait for a report as i had not expected an old and helpful member of the community to behave in that manner. In the past also we have taken some bold steps if even an old member behaved that way. You should understand that we have to put our foot down somewhere!
Come on guys, kuch to upai hoga, there has to be some way.
__________________
"My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right."

"I'm never wrong. Once I thought I was wrong, but I was wrong"
rhitwick is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 01:40 PM   #20 (permalink)
Wise Old Mouse
 
mrintech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bhopal, India
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Upai: Appoint rhitwick as a MOD
__________________
- MrinTech :)
mrintech is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 02:08 PM   #21 (permalink)
Wahahaha~!
 
Faun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pune/there
Posts: 7,673
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

^^not again mrintech !!!
__________________
Blog | Flickr | Battlelog
Spoiler:
Asus Z68 V-Pro|i5 2500k|TRUE Black|Ripjaws X|U2311H|N560GTX|D7000|XONAR STX|RE272|RE0|CC51|XE200PRO Walnut| TD II V2| Ultraphile|N5800

Mono
Faun is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 02:25 PM   #22 (permalink)
Wise Old Mouse
 
mrintech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bhopal, India
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Kidding is against forum rules?
__________________
- MrinTech :)
mrintech is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 02:30 PM   #23 (permalink)
Broken In
 
afonofa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 179
Lightbulb Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by thewisecrab View Post
There is the "Rate the thread" option already available on this forum. (it's overlooked by many )
But I guess that option has become a bit outdated.
Move it to the top of the page where it is easily visible and update that option to have negative ratings as well.

-1 to 0 to +5 with zero being the default rating of every thread.

After 1 page of replies:

1. If the ratings go negative, thread gets deleted.

2. If the ratings stay at zero with votes, thread gets locked.

3. If the ratings stay at zero without votes, thread continues.

4. If the thread does not finish 1 page of replies after 3 days, thread continues unless it comes under rule 1 or 2.

5. Any positive ratings(1 to 5) let it be the criteria for the thread starter to judge how his/her thread is received by other members, with the thread being allowed to continue.
afonofa is offline  
Old 25-12-2008, 07:30 PM   #24 (permalink)
Overlord v2.0
 
alexanderthegreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ICA Headquarters
Posts: 369
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

^^Its useless to expand the scale. One star already denotes "Terrible". Also, that democratic procedure has been suggested already by rhitwick and T.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhitwick View Post
Alexander, reading ur thread it seems that there is no solution. Is it? Is there really no solution? Why can't we talk and agree upon something which all of us will obey. There has to be some way. I still have hope. Something, anything?
!!! Hey, I wanted to ask something:
You said you want a "solution". Well, solution to what?
If you're talking about the problem that some of the TDF members just go haywire and start posting rubbish(or intentionally do so), the best option is moderation. But remember, mods sometime wait for reporting of the post... so its up to us to report 'em. I used to ignore all those kinds of post, but I'll do my duty from now on! You should too, as should all ye old faithful TDF members!

If you're talking of people disagreeing with mods, well, there will always be disagreements! Another problem with that democracy system you're(and many others are) suggesting is that if lots of people support the one who posted the locked thread, they might... no WILL start a new thread to discuss that topic, start rebellions, flame wars with the mods, mod bashing etc. Come to think of it, they already have! Remember Jhaat-Maharaaj? or chintu(the banana guy, he's still around)? There are numerous examples. I don't want to start another war, warriors please move over to the next paragraph, but I see unban praka123 signatures a lot nowadays!(I don't know him well! He might have been a heavenly soul!(No sarcasm)). It does cause mental tension for the mods you know! Make the life of TDF mods easier, who knows, you might even be rewarded with a gif or jpg signature!

P.S.: Oh my God! I really use a lot of exclamation marks. Kindly ignore.
__________________
The Only quote worth quoting: "E Loboa!!! What man???
Forum Rules:http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/announcement.php?f=16&a=1

Disclaimer:No offence meant to ANYONE!

Last edited by alexanderthegreat; 25-12-2008 at 07:45 PM.
alexanderthegreat is offline  
Old 26-12-2008, 06:27 AM   #25 (permalink)
Boom Boom Boom
 
cooldudie3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MACHEAVEN
Posts: 741
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

I can accept SMS Lingo but it's affecting the learning of kids around 10-13 years old. They use it constantly and they might even use on essays, writings, poetry and more.
__________________
I'm back! Gimme a hugggggg... :D
cooldudie3 is offline  
Old 26-12-2008, 09:18 AM   #26 (permalink)
Wise Old Mouse
 
mrintech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bhopal, India
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Quote:
Originally Posted by cooldudie3 View Post
I can accept SMS Lingo but it's affecting the learning of kids around 10-13 years old. They use it constantly and they might even use on essays, writings, poetry and more.
__________________
- MrinTech :)
mrintech is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 03:42 PM   #27 (permalink)
Overlord v2.0
 
alexanderthegreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ICA Headquarters
Posts: 369
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Okay, time to dig up the past (this thread). This is not a bump, I'm posting something meaningful here.
@rhitwick:Here's a potential solution you were looking for, dude!

After reading the incessant spamming, I agree now! A new rating in the thread rating system should be added. It should be named "Spam". AND, in case a thread gets too many Spam ratings, it should be... wait for it... AUTOMATICALLY deleted. I can already see some wise guys pointing out how that would help the spammers to delete posts too. Well, I would like to suggest that new members should not be permitted to rate the thread as a "Spam".

I might have been blunt earlier and told dear OP that he is actually asking for the power of moderation. But I'll now be blunter and admit that the only solution to stop the so called "Next spam meet at solar eclipse"(http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/showthread.php?t=107990) is to democratize the power of moderation. Of course, the mods may retain most of the power by making the spam-rated threads to move automatically to some hidden section or in the moderation section (think recycle bin here people) for any future restoration possibilities.

Come on mods and admins, We gotta prevent any potential OrangeJuice5s or ImAClown5s from posting on the "day of the solar eclipse".
__________________
The Only quote worth quoting: "E Loboa!!! What man???
Forum Rules:http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/announcement.php?f=16&a=1

Disclaimer:No offence meant to ANYONE!
alexanderthegreat is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 03:46 PM   #28 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 58
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Threads can be measured by their Length in cm, or circumference in nm!!!

We can also measure tension taking capabilities of the thread!!
Milkshake is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 03:48 PM   #29 (permalink)
Overlord v2.0
 
alexanderthegreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ICA Headquarters
Posts: 369
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

^^Are you one of those? Now please dont spam this one too.
__________________
The Only quote worth quoting: "E Loboa!!! What man???
Forum Rules:http://www.thinkdigit.com/forum/announcement.php?f=16&a=1

Disclaimer:No offence meant to ANYONE!
alexanderthegreat is offline  
Old 04-02-2009, 03:52 PM   #30 (permalink)
Answers everything
 
mmharshaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 47
Default Re: Measuring a THREAD standard

Great idea rhitwick....Spammers are increasing day by day on this forum...This will definitely put a stop to their foolish activities. I recommend the moderators implement this for the future threads to be posted in TD and provide a spam free environment....
__________________
The ultimate solution for all your pc problems: My answer
mmharshaa is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OOXML Almost An ISO Standard! CadCrazy Technology News 41 16-04-2008 03:05 PM
Loudness-measuring software trublu Software Q&A 3 12-03-2008 08:59 PM
32 bit or 64 bit is standard? varunbhide QnA (read only) 1 09-08-2006 01:08 PM
Internet Hours Measuring Gaurav Internet & WWW 3 23-05-2005 10:54 PM
any soft for measuring the temp. of mobo and cpu krishnathelord CPU / Motherboards 18 31-03-2005 12:05 AM

 
Latest Threads
- by icebags
- by bhaskar
- by Soumik

Advertisement




All times are GMT +5.5. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.2