| Forum |
|
|||||||
| CPU / Motherboards News, discussions, queries and problems related to CPUs and motherboards. Section Thread Index |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Right Off the Assembly Line
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 14
|
price performance ratio x2 3800+ is costly n 930d nearly gives a 90% performance n uses a 65nm processor so my q is which one is better even im a amd lover but in this case u answer??? |
|
|
| Advertisements. Register and be a member of the community to get rid of them. | |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,533
|
It depends on your usage. If you're into gaming and don't mind spending a little extra, then go for the X2 3800+. If you just want a fast proccy for general usage then save money and go for Intel.
PS AMD has announced massive price cuts on all their proccys after Conroe releases. If you wait a little you could get that X2 3800+ for a whole lot less. |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Wise Old Owl
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: shhhh!!!!! on a sniper point
Posts: 4,151
|
As AMD procs(single as well as dual core) run at relatively lower clocks than Intel nd ferforms as better(or greater) there is theoritically more room for overclocking as temp in not a big problem as Intel nd so AMD is oc friendly nd may give better results.
So I suggest X2 3800+ nd oc it from 2.0Ghz to 2.5 or 2.6Ghz with stock cooling with good ventillation or even higher clocks with a good copper heatsink fan combo.
__________________
G1: PII X4 B50 4.0 | TRUE 120*2 | TA790GXB A2+ | 4GB DDR2 GSkill 1200 | Audigy 2 | HD4870 | HEC 550 | MX 518. G2: AII 240 | M2N 68AM+ | 3GB| 8800GT | Zebby Plat 500 G3: XPS M1530 | FZ 16. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|