Quote:
Originally Posted by mikael_schiffer
The most amazing thing is how all these game reviewers are praising it. Maybe EA payed them. I cant imagine IGN gave it an 80%. One of the most critical reviewer is GameRevolution.com, who gave it B. I still feel Spore deserves a lot less than "B".
However, Will Wright could have made the game better if he had made the fun parts longer. For example, i really wished the 2nd stage and 3rd stage were longer. C'mon the 3rd stage had only 4 rival tribes,which you could convert/destroy in 5 minute!! Thats like 20 minute of REAL gameplay!!
|
Half of the other reviewers (GameSpot, IGN) are paid and the rest ask for money after reviewing a game and giving it good scores
.
Just look at it, some games which are really good are so under-rated. Stranglehold, Kane and Lynch, etc are awesome games but they get less score bcoz there devs. didnt give money to GameSpot, IGN ,etc.
I only beleive in user reviews. I only read reviews by fellow gamers on GameFaqs.com
If you want to build your 'own world' (as the game advertises itslef), go play a good strategy game like CoH, AoE, etc.
This game sux to the core. I know I praised it before but it was just after playing it for 15mins.
I unistalled this game after playing the secong stage. Spent 1 and a half day d/ling this sh1t. Hope I would have got some other game. Even Sims 2 and its expansion packs are better.
EA sux, Will Wright sux and Spore sux.