The iPhone is not innovative at all
Reason 1 : If a product has to be innovative, a very large number of internet / tech users should vote for it. Then only it becomes eligible for an 'innovative product'. Now whats this very large number ? OK, atleast 51 users should vote for it !
(no, I didn't mean the IE thread)
Reason 2 : Time magazine has no way related to Apple / iPhone. So how can it announce iPhone as something innovative ? ?
(no, I didn't mean the 'most secure OS' thread)
iPhone really deserve the position. Eventhough I haven't seen the product yet - and I am not an Apple fanboy, I think Time has done the right thing by selecting iPhone.