Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nemesis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mamba
go in 4 a ACER AF715 . will cost u round 6.5-7k . has a max resolution support 4 2048x1536 max res n a max refresh rate of 100hz at 1024x768 !!! this is the best ne monitor gives inthe 17'' category .
LG would give u max 1280x1024 n 85mhz n would cost u round 1.5-2k more than the acer 1 .
|
r u out of ur mind??? 2048x1536 on a 17" monitor???? and 1024x768 at 100Hz???? look what acer's website had 2 say:
Specifications
Model name Acer AF715
Size 17" natural flat tube
Phosphor pitch 0.25mm diagonal
Scanning frequency H: 30 – 98kHz V: 50 – 160Hz
Display area 300x230mm
Input signals RGB analogue
Maximum resolution 1600x1200 @ 75Hz
Recommended resolution 1024x768; flicker-free at 85Hz
Video bandwidth 200MHz
Power consumption 120W
Dimensions (WxHxD) 410x402x425 mm
Net weight 17kg
http://global.acer.com/products/monitor/af715.htm
even their 19: AF915 has a max resolution of only 1600x1200 just like the AF715...dont give out wrong info dude.....
|
hey dude
u think i gotta acer agency or somethin
i picked up the specs frm CHIP oct issue . dont believe me , check it out urself . n how m i supposed 2 no that , when the auhor there has specified it himself many times bout the specs
u alwayz there 2 correct me , thats gud . as it is m an 'anologue novice'
u think i do it on purpose ??? ne wayz it wasnt my fault , was CHIPs fault . will write 2 them.
n hey , getting 1600x1200 @ 75Hz ( acer ) is much better than a 1280 x 1024 @65Hz ( samsung ) ....... remember flicker-free...... gud 4 ur eyes