View Single Post
Old 18-02-2005, 05:58 PM   #7 (permalink)
enoonmai
Wise Old Owl
 
enoonmai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Parked diagonally in a parallel universe
Posts: 1,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienTech
trusting mcafee over norton..... If I was you I would go with something reliable like Avast or AVP or even FProt.
McAfee isn't reliable? This is the first time I am hearing that said. I've been using McAfee since VirusScan 5 after NAV started putting a load on my system that I couldn't bear. I don't know which version of McAfee AntiVirus you used, but McAfee VirusScan Professional 9 is just as good as NAV2005 when it comes to system protection. It's heuristics engine is just as good as the others and unlike NAV2005, its actually got improvements instead of a revamped codebase. I still dont get how you actually came to the conclusion that McAfee was unreliable. For all the years I've had both, McAfee had to be reinstalled 0 times while I lost track of how many times I've had to reinstall NAV. You should try Symantec's customer support and then try out McAfee's.
But as of late, I switched to Trend Micro PC-Cillin Internet Security Suite 2005. Its what both McAfee and NAV should have been in the first place.
__________________
Face it, kid! Provoking a reaction isn't the same thing as saying something significant - Calvin
A64 3000+@2.4G/Asus A8V-DLX/1G DDR400/BBA X800 XT PE/320G HGST SATA2
Playing FEAR XP/LSW2
enoonmai is offline