my 1800 is a dlt3c...so 2312mhz with just a .05 increase in vcore is easily possible :roll: :roll: ....n i am using it for the last 1-2 weeks without a single bsod...ppl have touched 2.5ghz on 1.6 vcore with this beauty
n i had tested it with 12 hrs of prime95...temps shot upto 51c..
and what i meant about higher fsb not equal to higher overall speed was that when the diff between the fsb is small but the speed diff. is higher,only then does this apply.eg.185x12.5=2312 is definitely faster than 200x11=2200 cause diff between fsbs is just 15mhz, but diff between clock speeds is 112mhz....so in such a situ. 185x12.5 is definitely faster
when its gonna be 200x10=2000 n 166x12=1992 then the 200 fsb will be surely faster...got it??
hoped this clears up ur doubts darklord??
and as for u crusader77, if u have to up ur vcore to 1.8v just to get a oc of 150mhz......dude u better forget ocing...n wtf do u mean by normal voltage=1.65v??my cpu is a dLt3c...if u know anything abt steppings the L in the DLT3C is supposed to indicate a stock vcore of 1.5V, DUT3C indicates 1.6v n DKV3D indicates a vcore of 1.65v n 333mhz fsb...get ur basics clear before u go around making posts:roll: :roll: :roll:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by darklord
Quote:
|
forget the **** about higher fsb=higher overall speed....185x12.5=2312 is definitely faster than 200x11=2200
|
Can you please explain on what basis you can say so? :roll:
Quote:
|
(2312mhz) is with just 1.55 vcore
|
That really is very good but according to me it is highly unlikely since it is an AMD chip. :roll:
Could you please clarify this?
|
8)