View Single Post
Old 06-11-2006, 04:18 AM   #30 (permalink)
mediator
String Phreak
 
mediator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In ur Evil Mind!
Posts: 2,457
Default Re: Who could be the Antichrist?

Quote:
Originally Posted by john_the_ultimate
Sorry but maybe I am not able to explain myself.
Ur not the only one. Most people try to debate without making themselves clear!

Quote:
Originally Posted by john_the_ultimate
But I simply wanted to say that I just pointed out that the "TEACHINGS" get filtered, I did not say anything about any books being validated for publishing.
May be, but u said they "added" stuff! Where? Anybody wud percieve that u said it about books!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohn_the_ultimate
Secondly, its not the matter of proof but of choice. And I am not really interested into knowing as to who my forefathers were. But if I could I would like to have some samples........
U want to have choice for u that holy people existed or not? Now thats insane. If u had limited it to proof, that wud have been understood! Its better to be logical than to be insane n asking about choices!

As for the highlighted part, Its a common human nature and I guess the most idiotic nature too that humans shud try to change! U don't want to keep a watch on ur history and u want others to give evidences from holy people's history??????????

U dont know who ur forefathers were! Tommororow ur children will ask who ur grandfather was! Since u dont know beyond ur father, what will u tell em? Ur children will ask for proof, what will u show em? Will u say, ur grandfather was a fictitious character? or perhaps a character from some story?

I hope u got mah point. The same's the case with holy books and holy people. Most People don't usually maintain their family tree and their culture. Then it starts to deplete n later the future generations ask who the man was from that culture! If they had maintained their history, then future generations instead asking "who he was" wud have been praising "the one who was before them".

So asking for concrete evidences like some video footage,blood samples (if u want that) in such a case, is a little far-fetched and a further mockery of the human nature I guess. So start making ur family tree, before ur children begin to ask for proof of even ur grandfather!

As for samples, aren't the ancient paintings, statues etc enough for u that date back to 1000s of yrs? We have Mahatma gandhi's statue. Wud u like if future generations ask absurdly like u even when they know all about Gandhiji and have a statue of him? U know n I know that gandhji existed, but will u like future generations to talk like u??

So instead of showing how insane the human nature can get, its better not to talk further!

Quote:
Originally Posted by john_the_ultimate
Thirdly, people who belive in holy people don't have any evidence to prove their existence and this is the argument as to "why they still believe in them"? And the answer is as I had stated earlier, its a matter of personel choice.
What evidence u really want?? Video footages?? Aren't the existing proofs enough for u? Its like convincing Pakistani leadership that there are terrorist camps operating on its soil! No matter how much evidence u give em, they still won't believe it !

Quote:
Originally Posted by john_the_ultimate
Well this discussion could go on and on. It's better we return to the topic. So in my opinion the real ANTICHRIST are people of today (most of them).......maybe I am also one of them.
Thats better!
__________________
Bad Bad server.....No candy for u!
mediator is offline