[praka123]

I dont want to flame.regarding security things,these are been fixed and if older versions of vulnerable software exists are pathched by the distro vendor.for eg;Debian.and searching for KDE/QT in secunia site will display a whopping number[Found: 216 Secunia Security Advisories, displaying 1-25]while GNOME shows smaller number of vulnerabilities[Found: 105 Secunia Security Advisories, displaying 1-25]but GNOME is the product coming from floss volunteers,when KDE started as propreitory.Because of the very existance of GNOME DE,QT announced KDE/QT as GPLed as U quote.As about GNOME's vulnerabilities,it is got fixed really fast..and i donknow why KDE's given an uphand though GNOME exists as a 100% free DE.Trolltech's ambitions with qt/kde are not that good looking for OSS.And i hate KDE's Wingdowish look if U mind it or not.Why should we hold the ghost of Wingdows in GNU/Linux as KDE?.Hope Linux will grow with GNOME and other open window managers.Happy GNU/Linuxing!