I dont know a lot about Win Xp itself so wont say a lot about longhorn but i just know one thing that except for the visual advancements win Xp is nothing but a super tweaked version of Win 2000. I had masterd Win NT quite a lot and switching to Win 2000 from NT was nothing but sheer fun. I never liked 95/98/ME platform. Dont know why. They just had to be formatted every week or so on my PC. But NT and 2000 used to stay for quite a while. I can say same about Xp but i am just a little dissappointed with Xp in terms of expectations which i was looking from it. I dont want to start a flame or Xp vs 2000 comparision poll or something just the expectation was too much(In terms of feature enhancements). Any user who would have shifted from ME or 98 to Xp would have definately been satisfied. But 2000 to Xp was below that expectation level.
I just hope Longhorn should just not be like that. It should offer something different in terms of performance. I dont want visual enhancements. Yes they do look good no doubt. But they require that much hardware to support it.
Just a thought.
Quote:
|
P.S. Just how many of you really know the feature differences between Office 2000/Xp/2003. Think about it
|