View Single Post
Old 12-11-2009, 08:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
Krow
Crowman
 
Krow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 4,050
Default Re: Windows 7 vs XP Performance Shoot-Out

Quote:
Originally Posted by desiibond View Post
^ 7k.

xp slows down a lot after few months and win7 is much better in this regard.

also, when using AD account to login, xp takes lot lot more time than win7
My experience has been completely different. Been on XP for like 4 years now. Never had a guest account on my PC. Even my P4 rig used to boot very fast due to good maintenance. XP slowed down only when infected with a virus. When I boot XP, without antivirus, it has about 20 processes running. The same is about 32 when on Win7. There lies the main speed difference. Lesser processes to run, means faster bootup. Vista was a nuisance though, with about 40 processes on bootup. Never has Win7 x64 booted faster than XP 32bit for me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krazzy Warrior View Post
I am stuck on Vista !! hmm will be trying Windows 7 soon! heard from many sources that it is alot better than vista and xp, and stand as a complete replacement for xp user!
For low end rigs, still XP is king. If you have more than 2GB RAM, then nothing in W7 should worry you. But still, for systems with 2GB RAM, the eyecandy better be turned off in W7.
__________________
Thinkdigit Forum Workspace Showoff Contest

Spoiler:
Abusive, offtopic post? Use the report post button.
Read before messaging any moderator for any query: FAQ + answers for new members
Read all the sticky threads before asking any type of query. Most basic questions are answered in those.

Ignorance of FORUM RULES is no defence.
Krow is offline