View Single Post
Old 10-04-2009, 12:48 PM   #27 (permalink)
amitash
Intel OCer
 
amitash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,127
Default Re: GTX295 beaten by 2xHD4890 CFx - -BIG TIME

Quote:
btw Physx and CUDA is almost non-existent. ATI's Havok is going to be used in most up coming games.
Physx and CUDA are new, and they are becoming better and better...Mirrors edge was the first release, you will see more in the future....And where are the 100 games that support havok? Im yet to see even one game that supports it...With amd's current drivers and lower cfx scalability than SLI, i dont see a more powerfull 4890

And FYI no they are NOT the same...They are very similar but NOT the same, their speeds differ...here:

2xgtx275 = 633mhz gpu clock, 1404mhz shader clock, 2322Mhz mem clock
gtx295 = 576mhz gpu clock, 1242mhz shader clock, 2000mhz mem clock

So 2xgtx275 IS going to be faster than gtx295 by some margin and it mostly will beat 2x4890 as a single gtx275 already pwns a single 4890.
__________________
My site: collegeclassroom.org
intel core i7-920||eVGA x58 sli||G-skill 6GB DDR3-1600| ZOTAC GTX480||Tagan BZ700||Antec 900||Logitech G15||Razer Death Adder and Megalodon
amitash is offline