Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecstasy
My bad.. i meant Bihar and Assam. Accidently typed UP. typo mistake.  |
Bihar never saw the internet??? <sarcasm>But I am from Bihar! Wow! How come I'm able to reply to your post then? Bet that's a bug, lets go report it! This bug is gonna make me rich!</sarcasm>
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chooza
May I be wrong, but as far as my knowledge goes. VSNL, one of the Gateway in India, is in private hands and Relience is also having one of the major internet carrier backbone in world, in in our country too, they do not use BSNL Network, instead they use their own.
When we are paying more then who care to lower price and higher capacity. Don't just blame govt organizations for the sake.
|
Why does everyone choose to misinterpret me? I wasn't
blaming anyone. In spite of the signature, I appear to be slightly more insensitive than a blunt axe, the way people decipher my posts. Anyway, VSNL's services are not available everywhere, are they? The largest network still belongs to BSNL and local Cable Operators. Consequently, the cheapest broadband is available from BSNL.
As for the go wireless scheme, that still requires infrastructure. Setting up of towers everywhere so that every user gets nice speeds requires lots of money. Who pays? The end-user does! If staying wired gives us high speed and low cost, why not stick to it? If we have started something, we should complete it! (Man, I feel like a dork
)