Monitor content or face ban: Delhi HC warns Facebook, Google
Related Stories:
The Indian government had come under severe criticism for asking Internet companies such as Facebook and Google to monitor content on their sites. Many labelled the move as an attempt to censor the Internet, triggering a heated debate - what should stay online and what should not. However, the Indian government maintained it did not intend to interfere with social media, nor it had any plans to evolve guidelines to regulate the Internet content. The Delhi High Court in its recent ruling has however taken government's earlier stance on the issue. The court not only asked Facebook and Google to remove 'offensive content' from their sites but also warned they may be blocked if they didn't comply to orders. The court further asked the companies to set up a mechanism to keep a check on such content on web page.
Mukul Rohtagi, counsel for Google India, acknowledged that some of the articles were obscene but the company could not control it. "No human interference is possible and, moreover, it can't be feasible to check such incidents. Billions of people across the globe post their articles on the website. Yes, they may be defamatory, obscene but cannot be checked," Mr Rohatgi was quoted as telling the court. "We cannot control billion minds. Some are conservative, some are liberal and some write all the defamatory and obnoxious articles on web pages."

Siddharth Luthra, appearing for Facebook India, told court that it was impossible to control the content with billions of people accessing the site. "A third party who uploads the content is not touched and we are sought to be liable in the case. Facebook India is not the controller of Facebook.com, it is Facebook.com which removes the content not me," he pointed out.
Many of us will agree that some online content can be termed as offensive. But it is quite next to impossible to monitor each and every individual on the Internet. And even if they are monitored, will it not be tantamount to 'censorship'? China has also similar control on the online content. Do you also back the Delhi HC directives? Let us know in the comments section below:
Also read,
- Google India says it cannot remove controversial but legal content
- India wants Facebook, Google to monitor user content
- Indian govt seeks effective monitoring of Twitter, Facebook
- Google, Twitter lock horns over search engine result changes
- RIM, India reach deal on access to BlackBerry Messenger, e-mail
- McAfee reports 'biggest series of cyber attacks' - 72 organisations hacked since 2006
- India, US join hands to tackle cyber crime, develop data sharing platform
Listed under tags :
Recommended Stories:
Google doodle celebrates 155th birthday of Heinrich...
Google doodle today celebrates 155th birth anniversary of German physicist Heinrich......Microsoft accuses Google of sidestepping privacy...
Microsoft jumped into the Google "Safari tracking" controversy today by accusing......Saavn music app on Facebook driving growth for...
Saavn (South Asian Audio Video Network), the popular music streaming service specializing......Tag Cloud
- social networking
- adobe
- linux
- google search
- flash player
- ir
- chrome
- yahoo
- google docs
- browsers
- adobe flash
- skype
- web development
- digit magazine
- javascript
- android
- browser
- security
- doodle
- iphone
- gmail
- google chrome
- google plus
- flash
- hacking
- firefox
- youtube
- internet explorer
- microsoft
- opera
- browser wars
- mozilla
- internet
- firefox 4
- apple
- ria
- amazon
- google doodle
- open source
- bing
- html5
- development
- internet security
- google+
- mozilla firefox
- hack















